Get One or Create One: the Impact of Graded Involvement in a Selection Procedure for a Virtual Agent on Satisfaction and Suitability Ratings
N = 86 participants were either confronted with a predefined virtual agent, or could select a virtual agent from predefined sets of six or 30 graphical models, or had the opportunity to self-customize the agent’s appearance more freely. We investigated the effect of graded user involvement in the selection procedure on their ratings of satisfaction with the agent and perceived task suitability. In a second step, we explored the psychological mechanism underlying this effect. Statistical analyses revealed that satisfaction with the chosen virtual agent increased with the degree of participants’ involvement in terms of more choice, but not in terms of self-customization. Furthermore, we show that this effect was driven by the perceived likeability, attractiveness, and competence of the agent. We discuss implications of our results for the development of a virtual agent serving as a virtual assistant in a smart home environment.
KeywordsTechnology acceptance Virtual agents Customization Smart home
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Reich, N., Eyssel, F.: Attitudes towards service robots in domestic environments: The role of personality characteristics, individual interests, and demographic variables. Journal of Behavioral Robotics 4, 123–130 (2013)Google Scholar
- 4.Schiffhauer, B., Bernotat, J., Eyssel, F., Bröhl, R., Adriaans, J.: Let the user decide! user preferences regarding functions, apps, and control modalities of a smart apartment and a service robot. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2016), pp. 971–982. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human computer interaction. Pearson, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Hurst, A., Tobias, J.: Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In: 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS), pp. 11–18. ACM, Dundee (2011)Google Scholar
- 11.Festinger, L.: A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1957)Google Scholar
- 15.Bergmann, K., Eyssel, F., Kopp, S.: A second chance to make a first impression? how appearance and nonverbal behavior affect perceived warmth and competence of virtual agents over time. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7502, pp. 126–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Li, L., Forlizzi, J., Dey, A., Kiesler, S.: My agent as myself or another: effects on credibility and listening to advice. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI 2007), pp. 194–208. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
- 17.Fiske, S.T., Neuberg, S.L.: A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 23, 1–74 (1990)Google Scholar
- 21.Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S.: Using multivariate statistics. Pearson, Harlow (2014)Google Scholar
- 22.Hayes, A.F.: Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar