After Brexit pp 271-321 | Cite as

New Forms of Social Security for Persons Moving Between the EU and the UK?

  • Yves Jorens
  • Grega Strban


In this chapter, a short history of the UK’s integration in the EU with respect to social security is presented. Moreover, the so-called Brexit agreement is analysed, with the emphasis on family benefits arrangement and possible consequences on their coordination within the EU even after this agreement did not become applicable. Most importantly, some options for a potential relation between the EU and the UK are discussed, where special attention is paid to some actual examples of relations with other countries. The impact and consequences of such examples are looked at.


Social security Free movement of persons Brexit History of UK in EU Models for a new partnership agreement 


  1. Ambuhl, M., and S. Zurcher. 2015. Immigration and Swiss-EU Free Movement of Persons: Questions of a Safeguard Clause. Swiss Political Science Review 21 (1): 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, C. 2016. Could Free Movement of Persons be Confined to Free Movement of Workers in Any Brexit Deal? December 2016.
  3. Bercusson, B. 1990. The European Community’s Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers. Modern Law Review 53 (5): 624–642. New Perspectives on European Law.Google Scholar
  4. Breitenmoser, S. 2003. Sectoral Agreement Between the EC and Switzerland: Contents and Context. Common Market Law Review 40 (5): 1137–1186.Google Scholar
  5. Brexit, Employment law consequences of Brexit. Addleshaw Goddard. 2016. BREXIT—Employment Law Consequences of Brexit.
  6. Bundeszentralamt für Steuern: Dienstanweisung zur Durchführung des Familienleistungsausgleichs nach dem X. Abschnitt des Einkommensteuergesetzes (DA-FamEStG) Stand 2011.
  7. Burke, C., O. Isberg Hannesson, and K. Bangsund. 2016. Life on the Edge: EFTA and the EEA as a Future for the UK and Europe. European Public Law 22 (1): 69–96.Google Scholar
  8. Carrera, S., E. Guild, and K. Eisele. 2015. No Move Without Free Movement: The EU-Swiss Controversy Over Quotas for Free Movement of Persons, CEPS Policy Brief No. 331. April 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Chetail, V. 2014. The Swiss Vote Against Mass Immigration and International Law: A Preliminary Assessment. Migration Policy Practice 4: 12–16.
  10. Church, C. 2007. Switzerland and the European Union, 263 p. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Cornelissen, R. 2009. 50 Years of European Social Security Coordination. European Journal of Social Security (EJSS) 11 (1–2): 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Denton, R.L. 2016. UK to Start Preliminary Trade Talks with India.
  13. Dhingra, S., and T. Sampson. 2016. Life After Brexit: What Are the UK’s Options Outside the European Union? Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, 10.
  14. European Commission. 2017. Fairness at the Heart of Commission’s Proposal to Update EU Rules on Social Security Coordination, Brussels, 13 December 2016. Last accessed January 2017.
  15. Felder, D., and C. Kaddous. 2001. Accords bilatéraux Suisse – UE (Commentaires), 260. Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar
  16. Friel, R.J. 2004. Providing a Constitutional Framework for Withdrawal from the EU: Article 59 of the Draft European Constitution. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53411.Google Scholar
  17. Gad, U. P. 2016. Could a ‘Reverse Greenland’ Arrangement Keep Scotland and Northern Ireland in the EU?
  18. Gstohl, S. 1996. Switzerland, Norway and the EU: The Odd Ones Out? Genève, l’institut européen de l’Université de Genève, 27 p.Google Scholar
  19. Guild, E. 2016. Brexit and Social Security in the EU, CEPS Commentary: Thinking Ahead for Europe, 17 Nov. 2016.
  20. Harhoff, F. 1983. Greenland’s Withdrawal from the European Communities. Common Market Law Review 20: 13–33.
  21. Helgesen, V. 2015. Brexit, a Norwegian View.
  22. HM Government. 2014. Review of the Balance of Competences Between the United Kingdom and the European Union: Social and Employment Policy (Summer 2014), 78 p. Available at: Last accessed January 2017.
  23. Jenni, S. 2016. Is the Swiss Model a Brexit Solution?
  24. Jorens, Y., Spiegel, B (ed.)., Fillon, J-C., Strban, G. Key challenges for the social security coordination Regulations in the perspective of 2020, trESS Think Tank report 2013, European Commission, 2013, 64 p.Google Scholar
  25. Keating, M. 2016. How Could Scotland Remain in the EU?
  26. Lang, E., I. Hunter, J. Froud, P. Walsh, and J. Goldsworthy. 2017. Brexit: Employment and Immigration Law Implications.
  27. Lhernould, J-P. (ed.), E. Eichenhofer, N. Rennuy, F. Van Overmeiren, and F. Wollenschläger. Assessment of the Impact of Amendments to the EU Social Security Coordination Rules to Clarify Its Relationship With Directive 2004/38/EC as Regards Economically Inactive Persons, Analytical Report 2015, FreSsco, European Commission, June 2015, 71 p.Google Scholar
  28. Marescau, M. 2006. Bilateral Agreements Concluded by the European Community, 413. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Mcgovern, P. 2016. Five Problems with UK Immigration Control Post-Brexit.
  30. Minderhoud, P. 2016. Sufficient Resources and Residence Rights Under Directive 2004/38. In Residence, Employment and Social Rights of Mobile Persons. On How EU Law Defines Where They Belong, ed. H. Verschueren, 47–74. Antwerpen: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  31. Mullock, J. 2016. Brexit—A Data Protection Perspective. Privacy & Data Protection 16 (6): 14–17.Google Scholar
  32. Munchau, W. 2016. Brexit: The Norway Option Is the Best Available for the UK.
  33. Nicolaides, P. 2014. Is Withdrawal From the European Union a Manageable Option? A Review of Economic and Legal Complexities. Bruges: College of Europe.
  34. Nordling, H. 2016. The EEA Agreement and the ‘Norway Option’: Integration Without Co-Determination, Eutopia Law.
  35. O’brien, C. 2017a. Brexit, Free Movement and Welfare: We Must Bring Evidence Back Into Fashion. Last accessed January 2017.
  36. ———. 2017b. The ECJ Sacrifices EU Citizenship in Vain: Commission v. United Kingdom. Common Market Law Review 54 (1): 209–244.Google Scholar
  37. O’leary, B. 2016. Detoxifying the UK’s Exit From the EU: A Multi-National Compromise Is Possible.
  38. Pedersen, T. 1994. European Union and the EFTA Countries, 121. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Peers, S. 2017. What Next After the UK Vote to Leave the EU?
  40. Pfeil, W.J. 2016. Social Benefits for Migrating Unemployed Persons. Rivista del Diritto della Sicurezza Sociale (RDSS) 2: 271–288.Google Scholar
  41. Portes, J. The “EEA Minus” Option: Amending Not Ending Free Movement.
  42. Sarmiento, D. 2017. Brexit or the Art of ‘Doing a Greenland’.
  43. Schmidt, V. 2016. Brexit and the EU: A New Deal for the EU or No Deal at All?
  44. Schulz, M. 2016. The EU Must Not Treat the UK as a Deserter – We Can Negotiate Without Rancour.
  45. Schwok, R., and N. Levrat. 2001. Switzerland’s Relations with the EU After the Adoption of the Seven Bilateral Agreements. European Foreign Affairs Review 6 (3): 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shaw, J. 2016. Where Does the UK belong? In Residence, Employment and Social Rights of Mobile Persons. On How EU Law Defines Where They Belong, ed. H. Verschueren, 301–322. Antwerpen: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  47. Spiegel, B. (ed.), K. Daxkobler, G. Strban, A P. VAN DER MEI. Analytical Report 2014: The Relationship Between Social Security Coordination and Taxation Law, FreSsco, European Commission, April 2015, 61 p.Google Scholar
  48. Spiegel, B. (ed.), D. Carrascosa Bermejo, A. Henberg, and G. Strban. 2015. Assessment of the Impact of Amendments to the EU Social Security Coordination Rules on Export of Family Benefits, Analytical Report, FreSsco, European Commission, June 2015, 81 p.Google Scholar
  49. Strban, G. 2016. Family Benefits in the EU – Is It Still Possible to Coordinate Them? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 23 (5): 775–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ———. 2017. Brexit and Social Security of Mobile Persons. ERA Forum 2/2017, 18 (2): 165–185.Google Scholar
  51. Vahl, M., and N. Grolimund. 2006. Integration Without Membership: Switzerland’s Bilateral Agreements with the European Union, 79. Brussel: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  52. Verschueren, H. 2009. Special Non-Contributory Benefits in Regulation 1408/71, Regulation 883/2004 and the Case Law of the ECJ. European Journal of Social Security (EJSS) 11 (1–2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ———. 2014. Free Movement or Benefit Tourism: The Unreasonable Burden of Brey. European Journal of Migration and Law 16 (2): 147–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zahn, R. 2016. After the Referendum and Before Brexit… Where Now for Workers’ Rights in the EU?


  1. Hard Evidence: How areas with low immigration voted mainly for Brexit,
  2. Theresa May appeals to centre ground but cabinet tilts to the right,
  3. The European Economic Area (EEA), Switzerland and the North,
  4. Commentary: What would UK immigration policy look like after Brexit? (The migration observatory at the university of Oxford),
  5. Could EU citizens living in the UK claim ‘acquired rights’ if there is a full Brexit?, Interview met Tim Eicke, Lexis PSL 2016,
  6. Independent, 14 March 2017, “EU nationals express ‘utter desperation’ following MPs rejection of Lords amendment”, author May Bulman:

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yves Jorens
    • 1
  • Grega Strban
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of LawGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of LawUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations