One Bright Byte: Dōgen and the Re-embodiment of Digital Technologies

  • David Casacuberta


In this chapter, I argue that key functions of digital apps are based on a disembodied nature of our selves which is not compatible with our human nature. The solution is not just to redesign those digital apps—a proposal that blindly accepts the premises of technological determinism—but to reconsider the whole concept of what it means to be human. I give a brief sketch of the practical philosophy and metaphysics of the thirteenth-century Japanese philosopher Eihei Dōgen to present another view of what it means to be human, in order to conceptualize a re-embodied self in the World Wide Web.


  1. Aubé, T. (2015). No UI is the new UI. Retrieved from (Last visit 15-06-2017).
  2. Barlow, J. P. (1996). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Retrieved from (Last visit 15-06-2017).
  3. Boellstorff, T. (2015). Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borst, E. M. (2009). Cyborg art: An explorative and critical inquiry into corporeal human-technology convergence. Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from (Last visit 15-06-2017).
  5. Butnor, A. (2014). Dōgen, feminism, and the embodied practice of care. In J. McWeeny & A. Butnor (Eds.), Asian and feminist philosophies in dialogue: Liberating traditions. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bynum, C. W. (1995). The resurrection of the body in Western Christianity, 200–1336. Lectures on the history of religions No. 15. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carolan, M. S. (2011). Embodied food politics. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  9. Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, J. W. (2000). Body, soul, and life everlasting: Biblical anthropology and the monism-dualism debate. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Curtin, D. (1994). Dōgen, deep ecology, and the ecological self. Environmental Ethics, 16(2), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dennett, D. C. (2014). Chapter VIII: Tools for thinking about free will. In Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  13. Dery, M. (1996). Escape velocity: Cyberculture at the end of the century. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  14. Descartes, R., & Sutcliffe, F. (Trans.). (1968). Discourse on method and the meditations. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Dogen, E., & Tanahashi, K. (Trans.). (2011). Treasury of the true dharma eye: Zen Master Dogen’s Shobo Genzo. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, D. A. (1971). Zen and ethics: Dōgen’s synthesis. Philosophy East and West, 21(1), 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Gibson, J. J. (1982). A preliminary description and classification of affordances. In E. S. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism (Chap. 4.9, Part II, pp. 403–406). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.Google Scholar
  20. Haraway, D. (1987). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(4), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  22. Heine, S. (1985). Existential and ontological dimensions of time in Heidegger and Dogen. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hurley, K. (2008). Food in the future: Does futures studies have a role to play? Futures, 40(7), 698–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keen, A. (2015). Internet is not the answer. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, H. J., & Leighton, T. D. (2004). Eihei Dogen: Mystical realist. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  26. Krishnamurthy, S. (2002). E-commerce management: Text and cases. South-Western Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  27. Leiner, B. M., Cerf, V. G., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D. C., et al. (2009). A brief history of the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(5), 22–31.Google Scholar
  28. Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lykke, N., & Braidotti, R. (1996). Between monsters, goddesses, and cyborgs feminist confrontations with science, medicine, and cyberspace. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  30. Mele, A. R. (2008). Psychology and free will: A commentary. In J. Baer, J. C. Kaufman, & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 325–346). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merleau-Ponty, M., & Smith, C. (Trans.). (1996). Phenomenology of perception. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  32. Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  33. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Palacios, M. (2011). Building accountable media cultures: Some peculiarities of media accountability in digital environments. In Communication and citizenship: Rethinking crisis and change. Braga: University of Minho.Google Scholar
  36. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Pierce, D. (2015). We are on the brink of a revolution in crazy-smart digital assitants. Wired. Retrieved from (Last visit 15-06-2017).
  38. Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porush, D. (1994). Hacking the brainstem: Postmodern metaphysics and Stephenson’s SnowCrash. Configurations, 2(3), 537–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raud, R. (2012). The existential moment: Rereading Dōgen’s theory of time. Philosophy East and West, 62(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, M. (2005). Stelarc: The monograph. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1994). Does technology drive history?: The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Stallabrass, J. (1997). Money, disembodied art, and the turing test for aesthetics. In S. Buck-Morris & J. Stallabrass (Eds.), Ground control: Technology and utopia (pp. 62–111). London: Black Dog.Google Scholar
  46. Stephenson, N. (1992). Snow Crash. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  47. Swan, M. (2013). The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data, 1(2), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Toyama, K. (2015). Geek Heresy. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  50. Trapani, G. (2008). Upgrade your life: The lifehacker guide to working smarter, faster, better. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  51. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  52. Vanderkam, L. (2012). 168 hours: You have more time than you think. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar
  53. Warburton, S. (2009). Second life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 414–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (Trans.). (1953). Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Wyatt, S. (2007). Technological determinism is dead; long live technological determinism. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamksa, J. Wajcman, & M. Lynch (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 165–180). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Zaleski, J. P. (2002). The soul of cyberspace. HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Zylinska, J. (Ed.). (2002). The cyborg experiments: The extensions of the body in the media age. A&C Black.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Casacuberta
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations