• Vincenzo Mario Bruno Giorgino
  • Zack Walsh


We are entering an era characterized by new social and economic forms beyond our understanding. In this introduction to Co-Designing Economies in Transition, we introduce the transdisciplinary vision intended to understand such changes, and we summarize each of the chapters that help map the Great Transition that is already underway. In particular, we explain why it is important to create dialogue between radical knowledge-practices and contemplative social sciences to meet the great challenges of the twenty-first century. As a new emerging paradigm, contemplative social sciences are based on systematic efforts to integrate the wisdom traditions with the social sciences. They are intended to help us develop a more open-minded approach to understanding social interactions within a participatory, but not pre-classificatory, scheme. As such, we contend that the transdisciplinary vision and methodologies offered by this book suggest avenues for new ways of thinking about and co-designing a socially just and sustainable future.


  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quakntum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, O. (2007). Climate change and forced migration: Observations, projections and implications. Occasional Paper, Human Development Report Office, UNDP, Geneva.Google Scholar
  3. D’Agnese, V. (2016). Undergoing, mystery, and half-knowledge: John Dewey’s disquieting side. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hutchins, E. (2010, October 1). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pinto-Dobernig, I. (2008). Migration and climate change. Geneva: International Organization for Migration (IOM).Google Scholar
  6. Polanyi, M. (2015). Personal knowledge towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original publishing 1958).Google Scholar
  7. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Whitehead, A. N. (1968). Modes of thought. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  9. Zelizer, V. (2012). How I became a relational economic sociologist and what does that mean? Politics & Society, 40, 145–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincenzo Mario Bruno Giorgino
    • 1
  • Zack Walsh
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Economic and Social Sciences, Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Institute for the Postmodern Development of ChinaClaremontUSA
  3. 3.Toward Ecological Civilization (EcoCiv)ClaremontUSA
  4. 4.Institute for Advanced Sustainability StudiesPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations