Advertisement

Sustainability Stress Testing the Financial System: Challenges and Approaches

  • Dieter Gramlich
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth book series (PSSBAFE)

Abstract

In addition to risks originating from the economic system, the stability of financial markets and institutions is exposed to adverse conditions in the surrounding social and ecological system. The exposure from unfavorable socio-ecological conditions (sustainability risks) affects the financial markets from multiple perspectives. A way to assess the financial system’s exposure to these risks and also to explore risk mitigation strategies is to incorporate sustainability risks into the framework of stress testing the financial system.

This contribution emphasizes directions for the design of sustainability stress test (SST) models for the financial system. The major challenges for conceptualizing an SST framework are related to modeling the sustainability stress factors, their propagation within the financial system and the system’s response. It is argued specifically that the structural pattern of the financial system and its behavioral dynamics have to be considered in a forward-looking way in order to adequately model the SST framework.

References

  1. Anand, K., Bédard-Pagé, G., & Traclet, V. (2014, June). Stress testing the Canadian banking system: A system-wide approach. Bank of Canada Financial System Review, 61–68.Google Scholar
  2. Batten, S., Sowerbutts, R., & Tanaka, M. (2016). Let’s talk about the weather: The impact of climate change on central banks. Bank of England Staff Working Paper, No. 603, London.Google Scholar
  3. Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schuetze, F., & Visentin, G. (2016). A climate stress-test of the EU financial system. University of Zurich Working Paper, Zurich.Google Scholar
  4. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2016). Dodd-Frank Act stress test 2016: Supervisory stress test methodology and results. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
  5. Bowman, G., Caccioli, F., Coburn, A. W., Hartley, R., Kelly, S., Ralph, D., Ruffle, S. J., & Wallace, J. (2014). Stress test scenario: Millennial uprising social unrest scenario. University of Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies – Cambridge Risk Framework series, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  6. CISL – Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership. (Ed.). (2015). Unhedgeable risk: How climate change sentiment impacts investment. University of Cambridge CISL Working Paper, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  7. CISL – Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership. (Ed.). (2016). Environmental risk analysis by financial institutions – A review of global practice. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  8. CISL & UNEP FI – Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, & United Nations Environment Programme – Finance Initiative. (Ed.). (2014). Stability and sustainability in banking reform: Are environmental risks missing in Basel III? Cambridge, UK/Geneva.Google Scholar
  9. Demekas, D. G. (2015). Designing effective macroprudential stress tests: Progress so far and the way forward. IMF – International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No. 15/146, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. EIU – The Economist Intelligence Unit. (Ed.). (2015). The cost of inaction: Recognising the value at risk from climate change. London.Google Scholar
  11. ESRB – European Systemic Risk Board. (2016a). Adverse macro-financial scenario for the EBA 2016 EU-wide bank stress testing exercise. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  12. ESRB – European Systemic Risk Board. (2016b). Too late, too sudden: Transition to a low-carbon economy and systemic risk. Reports of the Advisory Scientific Committee, No. 6, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  13. Gillingham, K., Nordhaus, W., Anthoff, D., Blanford, G., Bosetti, V., Christensen, P., McJeon, H., Reilly, J., & Sztorc, P. (2015). Modeling uncertainty in climate change: A multi-model comparison. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, No. 2022, New Haven.Google Scholar
  14. Gramlich, D. (2014). Sustainability, financial markets and systemic risk. In J. Hawley, A. Hoepner, K. Johnson, J. Sandberg, & E. Waitzer (Eds.), Handbook of institutional investment and fiduciary duty (pp. 222–238). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gramlich, D., & Finster, N. (2013). Corporate sustainability and risk. JBE – Journal of Business Economics, 83(6), 631–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gramlich, D., & Oet, M. V. (2017, forthcoming). Systemic financial feedbacks – Conceptual framework and modelling implications. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, wileyonlinelibrary.com.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2419
  17. Haben, P., & Friedrich, B. (2015). Stress testing European banks: Lessons for risk managers. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 8(3), 264–276.Google Scholar
  18. Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011, January). Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helbing, D. (2010). Systemic risks in society and economics. IRGC – International Risk Governance Council Paper, Geneva.Google Scholar
  20. IFC – International Finance Corporation. (2010). Climate risk and financial institutions – Challenges and opportunities. Washington, DC: IFC Publication.Google Scholar
  21. IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Fifth assessment report, Geneva.Google Scholar
  22. King, D., Schrag, D., Dadi, Z., Ye, Q., & Ghosh, A. (2015). Climate change: A risk assessment. CSaP – Centre for Science and Policy report, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Klomp, J. (2014, August). Financial fragility and natural disasters: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Stability, 13, 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krishnamurthy, A. (2010). Amplification mechanisms in liquidity crises. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), 1–30.Google Scholar
  25. Lietaer, B., Arnsperger, C., Goerner, S., & Brunnhuber, S. (2012). Money and sustainability – The missing link. A report from The Club of Rome – EU Chapter. Axminster: Triarchy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lydenberg, S. (2016). Integrating systemic risk into modern portfolio theory and practice. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 56–61.Google Scholar
  27. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  28. Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. L. (2004). Limits to growth. The 30-year update. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  29. Mercer (Mercer LLC). (2011). Climate change scenarios – Implications for strategic asset allocation. New York: Mercer LLC.Google Scholar
  30. Mercer (Mercer LLC). (2015). Investing in a time of climate change. New York: Mercer LLC.Google Scholar
  31. Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – PNAS, 107(26), 11721–11726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nordhaus, W. D. (2014). Estimates of the social cost of carbon: Concepts and results from the DICE-2013R model and alternative approaches. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1(1/2), 273–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Onischka, M., Liedtke, C., & Jordan, N. D. (2012). How to sensitize the financial industry to resource efficiency considerations and climate change related risks. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 14(3), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schoenmaker, D., & Van Tilburg, R. (2016a). Financial risks and opportunities in the time of climate change. Bruegel Policy Brief, iss. 2, Brussels.Google Scholar
  35. Schoenmaker, D., & Van Tilburg, R. (2016b). What role for financial supervisors in addressing environmental risks? Comparative Economic Studies, 58(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stern, N. (2006). Stern review on the economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
  37. Stern, N. (2009). Deciding our future in Copenhagen: Will the world rise to the challenge of climate change? Policy Brief, London.Google Scholar
  38. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris.Google Scholar
  39. UNEP FI – United Nations Environment Programme – Finance Initiative. (2016). Guide to banking and sustainability (2nd ed.). Geneva.Google Scholar
  40. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York.Google Scholar
  41. Vivid Economics. (2013). The macroeconomics of climate change. Report prepared for Defra, London.Google Scholar
  42. WEF – World Economic Forum. (2017). The global risks report 2017. Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dieter Gramlich
    • 1
  1. 1.DHBW–Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State UniversityHeidenheimGermany

Personalised recommendations