Advertisement

Youth as Architects of Peace? Street Mediation at the Norwegian Red Cross and Other National Red Cross Unions

  • Espen Marius Foss
  • Ida Hydle
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we present and analyze the case of Red Cross Street Mediation as an innovative example of peer-to-peer youth work on capacity building, conflict transformation and self-formation. Street Mediation has developed and spread throughout Norway since 1998 and is furthered by youth delegates from other Red Cross national societies in various contexts such as Colombia, Belize, Mexico, Guatemala, Zimbabwe, Lebanon, Romania, and Denmark. Central questions that we would like to investigate in this chapter are: What are the core elements of the methodology, structure, and knowledge that this program fosters; what sort of enabling environments are needed for Street Mediation (and the like) to be a resource for youth innovation and social change? How do young people appropriate these skills and apply them to their own lives and networks in different sociocultural contexts? Which unintentional effects might arise, and are there any dangers in terms of training youth as conflict mediators and social change agents with relation to societal structures of conflict and violence?

Keywords

Restorative practices Anthropology Non-violent communication Participatory methodology Dialogue circles Red Cross 

References

  1. Aertsen, I., Daems, T., & Robert, L. (2006). Institutionalizing restorative justice. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  2. Bitel, M. (2002). Mainstreaming diversity: Building bridges to young people in conflict (report on the interim evaluation of prosjekt gatemegling). London: Partners in Evaluation.Google Scholar
  3. Boal, A. (1979). Theater of the oppressed. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boyes-Watson, C. (2008). Peacemaking circles & urban youth: Bringing justice home. St. Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.Google Scholar
  5. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice & responsive regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Christie, N. (1976). Conflicts as property. Oslo: Universitet i Oslo, Institut for kriminologi og strafferett.Google Scholar
  7. Christie, N. (2004). A suitable amount of crime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Dale, G. (2002). Konflikt i gatelys: Aktiviteter, resultater og utfordringer i Gatemeglingsprosjektet [Conflicts in street light – Activities, results and challenges in the street mediation project]. Oslo: Norwegian Mediation Service.Google Scholar
  9. Dale, G. (2006). Fra konflikt til samarbeid: grunnbok i konfliktarbeid med ungdom [From conflict to co-operation: Introduction to conflict work with youth]. Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forlag.Google Scholar
  10. Dandurand, Y., & Griffiths, C. T. (2006). United Nations handbook on restorative justice programmes. New York: UN, Criminal Justice Handbook Series. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/06-56290_Ebook.pdf
  11. De Bono, E. (1995). Parallel thinking: From Socratic thinking to de bono thinking. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. De Bono, E. (2000). Six thinking hats. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Diamond, D. (2007). Theatre for living: The art and science of community-based dialogue. Oxford: Trafford Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Eide, A. K., & Gjertsen, H. (2009). Med! Eller? Virkninger av, og utfordringer ved gjenopprettende rett som alternativ eller supplement til straff [With? Or? Effects of, and challenges with restorative justice as alternative or supplement to criminal justice]. Bodø: Nordlandsforskning.Google Scholar
  15. Farstad, C., & Odden, K. (2015). Konfliktarbeid i skolen: Med gjenopprettende tilnærming [Conflict work in school: With restorative approaches]. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.Google Scholar
  16. Follestad, B., & Wroldsen, N. (2017). Sirkel – en metode for relasjonsarbeid og godt læringsmiljø [Circle – A method for working on relations and learning environment]. Bergen: Fagbokforl.Google Scholar
  17. Foss, E. M. (2008). Road trip to Copenhagen: Young street mediators on study trip (Ethnographic, participatory film). Kristiansand: Universitetet i Agder.Google Scholar
  18. Foss, E. M. (2009a). Unge flyktninger og fredelige samuraier. Konfliktverksted på asylmottak (film) [Young refugees and peaceful samurai’s: Conflict workshop at refugee centres]. Oslo: UDI.Google Scholar
  19. Foss, E. M. (2009b). Xxx utenbys. Film om ungdom på konfliktverksted [Xxx out of town: A film about youth in a conflict workshop]. Agder: Universitetet i Agder.Google Scholar
  20. Foss, E. M. (2016). Dialogens paradoks: Fremveksten av gjenopprettende prosesser i Norge [The dialogical paradox of the emergence of restorative justice in Norway]. Doctoral dissertation, monograph, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (2001[1978]). Governmentality. In P. Rabinow & J. D. Faubion (Eds.), The essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984 (Vol. 3, pp. 201–222). London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  22. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. Freuchen, A. (2013). The lost years: Suicide among children and young adolescents: A psychological autopsy study of suicide victims 15 years and younger 1993–2004 in Norway. Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar
  24. Galtung, J., Jacobsen, C. G., Brand-Jacobsen, K. F., & Tschudi, F. (2000). Searching for peace: The road to TRANSCEND. London: Pluto Press in association with TRANSCEND.Google Scholar
  25. Gilbert, E. R. (2015a). Internal review of international street mediation initiatives. Oslo: Norwegian Red Cross.Google Scholar
  26. Gilbert, E. R. (2015b). Red Cross street mediation: Handbook for instructors. Internal review. Oslo: Norwegian Red Cross.Google Scholar
  27. Hasund, I. K., & Hydle, I. (2007). Ansikt til ansikt: konfliktrådsmegling mellom gjerningsperson og offer i voldssaker [Face to face: Conflict mediation between offender and victim in cases of violence]. Oslo: Cappelen.Google Scholar
  28. Heyes, S. B., & Chii Fen, H. (2017). The adolescent brain: Vulnerability and opportunity. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicef-irc.org/article/1149/11
  29. Hoëm, I. (2015). Languages of governance in conflict. Negotiating democracy in Tokelau. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  30. Hopkins, B. (2004). Just schools: A whole school approach to restorative justice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Hopkins, B. (2012). Restorative justice as social justice. Nottingham Law Journal, 21, 121–132.Google Scholar
  32. Hydle, I. (2006). An anthropological contribution to peace and conflict resolution studies. Contemporary Justice Review, 9(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580600827876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hydle, I. (2007). Gatemeglingsprosjektet i Oslo røde kors: En evaluering [Evaluation of the street mediation project at Oslo red cross]. Oslo: Oslo Red Cross.Google Scholar
  34. Hydle, I., & Seeberg, M. L. (2013). Tett på nr. 3: Tett på unge [Close at youth: Report on red cross youth activities]. Oslo: NOVA, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
  35. Kapferer, B. (2005). Ritual dynamics and virtual practice. Beyond representation and meaning. In D. Handelman & G. Lindquist (Eds.), Ritual in its own right: Exploring the dynamics of transformation (pp. 35–54). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  36. Kjøbli, J., & Ogden, T. (2014). A randomized effectiveness trial of individual child social skills training: Six-month follow-up. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 8(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-014-0031-6
  37. Kwon, S. A. (2013). Uncivil youth: Race, activism, and affirmative governmentality. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822399094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lien, M., Lidén, H., & Vike, H. (2001). Likhetens paradokser: Antropologiske undersøkelser i det moderne Norge [The paradox of equality: Anthropological investigations in modern Norway]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  39. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Moore, D., & McDonald, J. (2000). Guiding principles of the conferencing process. In G. Burford & J. Hudson (Eds.), Family group conferencing: New directions in community-centered child and family practice (pp. 49–57). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  41. Nambisan, S. (2009). Platforms for collaboration. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Stanford: Leland Stanford Jr. University.Google Scholar
  42. Olweus, D. (2007). Olweus bullying prevention program: Teacher guide. Center City, MN: Hazelden.Google Scholar
  43. Pavlich, G. (1996). Justice fragmented: Mediating community disputes under postmodern conditions. London: Routlegde.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pavlich, G. (2005). Governing paradoxes of restorative justice. London: GlassHouse Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428368 Google Scholar
  45. Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Standford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.Google Scholar
  46. Pranis, K., Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1998). Guide for implementing the balanced and restorative justice model. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U. S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  47. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Nonviolent communication: A language of life. Encinitas, CA: PuddleDancer Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rydningen, E. N. (2009). Kryssende lojaliteter, konkurrerende autoriteter: stat, stamme, religion og nasjon blant kurdere i syriske Jazeera [Conflicting loyalty, competing authority: State, tribe, religion and nation among Kurds in Syrian Jazeera]. Bergen: E.N. Rydningen.Google Scholar
  50. Strang, H., & Sherman, L. W. (2007). Restorative justice: The evidence. London: The Smith Institute.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Thorsborne, M., & Blood, P. (2013). Implementing restorative practices in schools: A practical guide to transforming school communities, implementing restorative practices in schools. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  53. Wachtel, T. (2003). Restorative justice in everyday life: Beyond the formal ritual. Reclaiming Children and Youth: The Journal of Strength-based Interventions, 12(2), 2083–2087.Google Scholar
  54. Wachtel, T. (2016). Defining restorative. Bethlehem: International Institute for Restorative Practices. Retrieved from http://www.iirp.edu/what-we-do/what-is-restorative-practices/defining-restorative
  55. Woolford, A., & Ratner, R. S. (2010). Disrupting the informal-formal justice complex: On the transformative potential of civil mediation, restorative justice and reparations politics. Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice, 13(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580903549094 Google Scholar
  56. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.Google Scholar
  57. Zehr, H. (2005). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press.Google Scholar
  58. Zehr, H., & Toews, B. (2004). Critical issues in restorative justice. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  59. Zigon, J. (2009). Within a range of possibilities: Morality and ethics in social life. Journal of Anthropology, 74(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840902940492 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Espen Marius Foss
    • 1
  • Ida Hydle
    • 2
  1. 1.Østfold University CollegeHaldenNorway
  2. 2.Oslo and Akershus University CollegeOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations