Crowdfunding as a Font of Entrepreneurship: Outcomes of Reward-Based Crowdfunding

  • Ethan Mollick


Crowdfunding has attracted considerable interest as a new way of financing a variety of ventures, from creative works to for-profit companies. For example, as of 2017, Kickstarter, the largest reward-based crowdfunding site, has facilitated the raising of over USD 2.9 billion from over 12 million people, funding over 100,000 projects. In this chapter, I will use data from two large-scale surveys of Kickstarter funders to shed light on the impacts of reward-based funding. I will first examine whether crowdfunded projects actually provide their promised rewards. Then I will delve into the wider impact of reward crowdfunding projects.


  1. Ahlers, Gerrit K.C., Douglas Cumming, Christina Günther, and Denis Schweizer. 2015. Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39: 955–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergmann, Michael. 2011. IPFWEIGHT: Stata Module to Create Adjustment Weights for Surveys. Statistical Software Components. Boston College Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  3. Cosh, Andy, Douglas Cumming, and Alan Hughes. 2009. Outside Enterpreneurial Capital. The Economic Journal 119: 1494–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cumming, Douglas J., Lars Hornuf, Moein Karami, and Denis Schweizer. 2016. Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding. Social Science Research Network. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  5. Greenberg, J., and E. Mollick. 2016. Activist Choice Homophily and the Crowdfunding of Female Founders. Administrative Science Quarterly 62 (2): 341–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hornuf, Lars, and Matthias Schmitt. 2016. Success and Failure in Equity Crowdfunding. DICE Report 14: 16–22.Google Scholar
  7. Kriauciunas, Aldas, Anne Parmigiani, and Miguel Rivera-Santos. 2011. Leaving Our Comfort Zone: Integrating Established Practices with Unique Adaptations to Conduct Survey-based Strategy Research in Nontraditional Contexts. Strategic Management Journal 32: 994–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mollick, E. 2014. The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: Determinants of Success and Failure. Journal of Business Venturing 29: 1–16. Scholar
  9. Mollick, E., and R. Nanda. 2016. Wisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in Funding the Arts. Management Science 62: 1533–1553. Scholar
  10. Nickerson, David W. 2007. Does Email Boost Turnout. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2: 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sorenson, Olav, Valentina Assenova, Guan-Cheng Li, Jason Boada, and Fleming Lee. 2016. Expand Innovation Finance via Crowdfunding. Science 354: 1526–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ethan Mollick
    • 1
  1. 1.The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations