Advertisement

Physical and Epistemic Objects in Museum Conservation Risk Management

  • Erica Coslor
Chapter
Part of the Technology, Work and Globalization book series (TWG)

Abstract

Conservation risk management in museums is introduced as a type of managerial technique, highlighting the utility of object-focused approaches. This chapter interweaves techniques of material culture studies, sociology of knowledge and science and technology studies to think about two distinct types of objects in museums: the cultural and historical objects of the collections, as well as the epistemic knowledge objects that contribute to management practice. This theoretical approach provides a foundation for ethnographic research focusing on actual practice. With the example of objects in museum conservation risk management, I highlight the transformations of objects in their trajectory into systems. The chapter also provides a methodological review of research steps for ethnographic research using a ‘follow the object’ approach for ethnographic research in museums and more broadly.

Keywords

Risk management Museums Artefacts Cultural and historical objects Epistemic knowledge objects Ethnographic methods Follow the object 

References

  1. Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., et al. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti, S. J. M. M. (2005). Objects and the museum. Isis, 96(4), 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, V. (1996). Pictures at an exhibition: Conflicting pressures in museums and the display of art. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4), 797–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Association of Museum Directors. (2011). Professional practices in art museums. New York: AAMD. Retrieved from https://aamd.org/sites/default/files/document/2011ProfessionalPracitiesinArtMuseums.pdf
  5. Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Axiell. (n.d.). EMu. Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://alm.axiell.com/solutions/technology/emu
  7. Bechky, B. A. (2003). Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 720–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  9. Brivot, M., Himick, D., & Martinez, D. (2016). Constructing, contesting, and overloading: A study of risk management framing. European Accounting Review, 2, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005). Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlile, P. R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2013). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coslor, E. (2016). Transparency in an Opaque market: Evaluative frictions between “thick” valuation and “thin” price Data in the art market. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coslor, E., & Spaenjers, C. (2016). Organizational and epistemic change: The growth of the art investment field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 55, 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11(6), 773–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing: And other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  16. Czarniawska, B. (2008). Organizing: How to study it and how to write about it. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(1), 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Czarniawska, B. (2012). Operational risk, translation, and globalization. Contemporary Economics, 6(2), 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Czarniawska, B., & Mouritsen, J. (2009). What is the object of management? How management technologies help to create manageable objects. In C. S. Chapman, D. J. Cooper, & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting, organizations, and institutions: Essays in honour of Anthony Hopwood (pp. 157–174). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Vaujany, F.-X., Haefliger, S., Fomin, V., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). Regulation of information technology-based practices: The case of a trading floor incident in an Investment Bank. In F.-X. de Vaujany, N. Mitev, G. F. Lanzara, & A. Mukherjee (Eds.), Materiality, rules and regulation: New trends in management and organization studies (pp. 250–266). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267–292). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dominguez Rubio, F., & Silva, E. B. (2013). Materials in the field: Object-trajectories and object-positions in the field of contemporary art. Cultural Sociology, 7(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1978). The world of goods. London: Allen Lane—The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Feldstein, M. (Ed.). (1992). The economics of art museums. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fischer, M. D., & Ferlie, E. (2013). Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(1), 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franklin, S., & Roberts, C. (2006). Born and made: An ethnography of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilgartner, S. (1992). The social construction of risk objects: Or, how to pry open networks of risks. In J. F. Short & L. B. Clarke (Eds.), Organizations, uncertainties, and risk (pp. 39–53). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hillman, J. (2008). The box takes off on global journey. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7600180.stm
  28. Jordan, S., & Messner, M. (2012). Enabling control and the problem of incomplete performance indicators. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(8), 544–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knorr Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Knorr Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knorr Cetina, K., & Bruegger, U. (2002). Traders’ engagement with markets: A postsocial relationship. Theory Culture & Society, 19(5–6), 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knorr Cetina, K., & Reichmann, W. (2015). Professional epistemic cultures. In M. Fischer, I. Langemeyer, & M. Pfadenhauer (Eds.), Epistemic and learning cultures: Wohin sich Universitäten entwickeln (pp. 18–33). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
  36. Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as a process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lai, C.-L. (2004). Art exhibitions travel the world. In M. Sheller & J. Urry (Eds.), Tourism mobilities: Places to play, places in play (pp. 90–102). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Lai, C.-L. (2006). The risk of historical artefacts in travel: The construction of risk in the international travelling exhibition. Journal of Historical Sociology, 19(3), 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986 [1979]). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lepinay, V.-A., & Callon, M. (2009). Sketch of derivations in Wall Street and Atlantic Africa. In C. S. Chapman, D. J. Cooper, & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting, organizations, and institutions: Essays in honour of Anthony Hopwood (pp. 276–306). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Levinson, M. (2008). The Box: How the shipping container made the world smaller and the world economy bigger. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lindberg, K., & Walter, L. (2013). Objects-in-use and organizing in action nets: A case of an infusion pump. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(2), 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. MacKenzie, D. (2003). An equation and its worlds: Bricolage, exemplars, disunity and performativity in financial economics. Social Studies of Science, 33(6), 831–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. MacKenzie, D. (2009). Making things the same: Gasses, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacKenzie, D. (2011). The credit crisis as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1778–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2013). Organizing processes and the construction of risk: A discursive approach. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mailhot, C., & Langley, A. (2017). Commercializing academic knowledge in a business school: Orders of worth and value assemblages. In C. Cloutier, J.-P. Gond, & B. Leca (Eds.), Justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations (pp. 241–269). Bingley, UK: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. In G. Marcus (Ed.), Ethnography through thick and thin (pp. 79–104). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Miller, D. (1985). Artefacts as categories: A study of ceramic variability in central India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Millo, Y., & MacKenzie, D. (2009). The usefulness of inaccurate models: Towards an understanding of the emergence of financial risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(5), 638–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muething, G., Waller, R. R., & Graham, F. (2005). Risk assessment of collections in exhibitions at the Canadian museum of nature. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 44(3), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., & Callon, M. (2007). An introduction to market devices. The Sociological Review, 55(S2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Museum Victoria. (n.d.). Bioinformatics. Retrieved December 8, 2016, from https://museumvictoria.com.au/bioinformatics/.
  59. Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Epistemic practices and object relations in professional work. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Poon, M. (2007). Scorecards as devices for consumer credit: The case of fair, Isaacs & company incorporated. Sociological Review, 55(s2), 284–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Power, M. (2015). How accounting begins: Object formation and the accretion of infrastructure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roginski, A. (2015). The hanged man and the body thief: Finding lives in a museum mystery. Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Townley, B. (2004). Managerial technologies, ethics and managing. Journal of Management Studies, 41(3), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Usner, D. (2012). ASE address 2011: An ethnohistory of things: Or, how to treat California’s canastromania. Ethnohistory, 3, 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vollmer, H. (2007). How to do more with numbers: Elementary stakes, framing, keying, and the three-dimensional character of numerical signs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(6), 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Waller, R. R. (1995). Risk management applied to preventive conservation. In C. L. Rose, C. A. Hawks, & H. J. Genoways (Eds.), Storage of natural history collections: A preventive conservation approach (Vol. 1, pp. 21–27). Iowa City, IA: Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections.Google Scholar
  71. Waller, R. R. (2003). Cultural property risk analysis model: Development and application to preventive conservation at the Canadian museum of nature (Vol. 13). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica Coslor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management & MarketingUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations