Advertisement

Schatzki and Techno-Organizational Practice

  • Anna Morgan-Thomas
Chapter
Part of the Technology, Work and Globalization book series (TWG)

Abstract

This chapter explores a possibility of an activity-based view of sociomateriality. It argues that the treatment of sociomaterial practices and the corresponding debates have tended to prioritize epistemology over ontology and scarce emphasis has been paid to metaphysical assumptions; and that sociomaterial studies have tended not to recognize the differences in metaphysical assumptions between the practice theories of actions and theories of arrangements. In extending Schatzki’s practice theory to the study of techno-organizational phenomena, the specific objectives here are to examine the ontological status of practice in sociomateriality research and to offer an activity-based conceptualization of sociomaterial practice. The key argument advanced is that a theory of actions may address sociomaterial ‘doing’ and account more fully for the role of technology in organizing.

Keywords

Action theories Activity-based theory Arrangement theories Metatheory Practice theory Substantivism 

References

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum Physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132–161). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2016). From substantialist to process metaphysics—Exploring shifts in IS research. In L. Introna, D. Kavanagh, S. Kelly, W. Orlikowski, & S. Scott (Eds.), Beyond interpretivism? New encounters with technology and organization. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R. D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S., & Vidgen, R. (2014). The sociomateriality of information systems: Current status, future directions. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 809–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2009). On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 442–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2012). On sociomateriality. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 49–66). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fayard, A.-L., & Weeks, J. (2014). Affordances for practice. Information and Organization, 24(4), 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldman, M., & Orlikowski, W. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, M. (2014). A matter of life and death: Exploring conceptualizations of sociomateriality in the context of critical care. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 895–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung, Y., & Lyytinen, K. (2013). Towards an ecological account of media choice: A case study on pluralistic reasoning while choosing email. Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kautz, K., & Jensen, T. B. (2012). Sociomateriality: New vocabulary or reformulation of existing theories? In Proceedings of the 2nd organizations, artifacts and practices (OAP) workshop materiality and space in management and organization studies, Paris, France, May 10–12, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. Kautz, K., & Jensen, T. B. (2013). Sociomateriality at the royal court of IS: A Jester’s monologue. Information and Organization, 23(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(4), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mazmanian, M., Cohn, M., & Dourish, P. (2014). Dynamic reconfiguration in planetary exploration: A sociomaterial ethnography. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 831–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mutch, A. (2013). Sociomateriality—Taking the wrong turning. Information and Organization, 23, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orlikowski, W. J. (2009). The sociomateriality of organizational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 10, 1–17.Google Scholar
  30. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2014). What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organization Science, 25(3), 868–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring material-discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Østerlie, T., Almklov, P. G., & Hepsø, V. (2012). Dual materiality and knowing in petroleum production. Information and Organization, 22, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History, 16(2), 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schatzki, T. R. (2010). Materiality and social life. Nature and Culture, 5(2), 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schatzki, T. R. (2013). The edge of change: On the emergence, persistence, and dissolution of practices. In E. Shove & N. Spurling (Eds.), Sustainable practice: Social theory and climate change (pp. 31–46). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). Sociomateriality—Taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch. Information and Organization, 23(2), 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2014). Entanglements in practice: Performing anonymity through social media. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 863–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Venters, W., Oborn, E., & Barrett, M. (2014). A trichordal temporal approach to digital coordination: The sociomaterial mangling of the CERN grid. MIS Quarterly, 38, 927–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Morgan-Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Adam Smith Business SchoolUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations