Advertisement

Conclusion: Archipelagos and Estuaries: Mobility, Local Authorities and the Governance of Multiple Elsewheres

  • Loren B Landau
Chapter
Part of the Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship book series (MDC)

Abstract

Rapid movements of people into, within and out of cities worldwide are rescaling and respatialising process of economic and social exchange and forms of political representation and membership. Drawing on empirical research in South Africa and Botswana, this chapter considers the politics and governance of estuarial zones and archipelagos generated by rapid population growth, ongoing human mobility and socio-economic translocality. It argues that local authorities are rarely equipped to respond to the fundamental challenges these formations present let alone capitalise on the opportunities such fluid urbanism offers. The obstacles are conceptual, institutional and political. For one, there is insufficient awareness and acceptance that movement and multilocality have local implications, and are local responsibilities. Yet for municipal authorities to develop proactive, progressive responses, institutional and political incentives––including budgeting and accountability––must also be recognised and addressed. This will require reconsidering administrative demarcation and understandings of political community. The chapter ends with suggestions for developing new modes of analysis and engagement reconsidered for an era of mobility and multilocality.

References

  1. Bocquier, P. (2005). World urbanization prospects: An alternative to the UN model of projection compatible with the mobility transition theory. Demographic Research, 12, 197–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, E. (2014). Migration and city governance in Botswana: The case of Gaborone. Unpublished research report. Johannesburg: African Centre for Migration & Society.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, E., & Crush, J. (2012). Unfriendly neighbours: Contemporary migration from Zimbabwe to Botswana, Migration policy series (Vol. 61). Cape Town: Southern African Migration Project.Google Scholar
  4. Central Statistics Office, Botswana. (2005). 2001 population census atlas: Botswana. Gaborone: Centrals Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  5. Crush, J., Williams, V., & Peberdy, S. (2005). Migration in Southern Africa. Geneva: Global Commission on International Migration.Google Scholar
  6. Duchêne-Lacroix, C. (2014). Archipel oder die Territorialität in der Multilokalität der Lebenswelt. In P. Weichhart & P. Rumpolt (Eds.), Mobil und doppelt sesshaft Studien zur residenziellen Multilokalität, Abhandlungen zur Geographie und Regionalforschung (Vol. 17, pp. 218–239). Wien: Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung.Google Scholar
  7. Faku, D. (2013). Eskom plan brings boom to Lephalale. Business Report (14 October 2013). http://www.iol.co.za/business/companies/eskom-plant-brings-boom-to-lephalale-1.1591263#.U6luzrHlazg
  8. Faustmann, A. (2013). Migration policy, integration policy and integration performance: Methodological challenges of policy evaluation. Paper prepared for ICCP 13. Available at http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_18_s2_faustmann.pdf
  9. Götz, G. (2003). The role of local government towards forced migrants. In L. B. Landau (Ed.), Forced migrants in the new Johannesburg: Towards a local government response (pp. 24–36). Johannesburg: Forced Migration Studies Programme.Google Scholar
  10. Joppke, C. (2007). Beyond national models: Civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics, 30(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Juzwiak, T., McGregor, E., & Siegel, S. (2014). Migrant and refugee integration in global cities. The Hague: The Hague Process on Refugees and Migration.Google Scholar
  12. Kihato, C. W., & Muyeba, S. (2015). The challenges and prospects of African urbanization: Forging Africa’s economic growth through sustainable urban policies. Unpublished report for the cities Alliance.Google Scholar
  13. Kymlicka, W. (2010). Multiculturalism: Success, failure, and the future. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Landau, L. B. (Ed.). (2011). Exorcising the Demons within: Xenophobia, violence and statecraft in contemporary South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press; Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Landau, L. B., & Duponchel, M. (2011). Laws, policies, or social position? Capabilities and the determinants of effective protection in four African cities. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landau, L. B., Segatti, A., & Misago, J. P. (2011). Governing migration & urbanisation in South African municipalities: Developing approaches to counter poverty and social fragmentation. Pretoria: South African Local Government Association.Google Scholar
  17. Maytree Foundation. (2012). Do not judge a book by its cover: Good ideas from successful cities: Municipal leadership on immigrant integration. Toronto: Maytree Foundation. http://citiesofmigration.ca/good-ideas-in-integration/municipal/
  18. Mbembe, J.-A., & Nuttall, S. (2004). Writing the world from an African metropolis. Public Culture, 16(3), 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Penninx, R., & Martiniello, M. (2004). Integration policies and processes: State of the art and lessons. In R. Penninx, K. Kraal, M. Martiniello, & S. Vertovec (Eds.), Citizenship in European cities. Immigrants, local politics and integration policies (pp. 139–163). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Polzer, T. (2008). Invisible integration: How bureaucratic, academic and social categories obscure integrated refugees. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(4), 476–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Potts, D. (2009). The slowing of sub-Saharan Africa’s urbanization: Evidence and implications for urban livelihood. Environment and Urbanization, 2(1), 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Potts, D. (2011). Making a livelihood in (and beyond) the African city: The experience of Zimbabwe. Africa, 81(4), 588–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts, B., & Hohmann, R. (2014). The systems of secondary cities: The neglected drivers of urbanizing economies. In: CIVIS #7. Brussels: Cities Alliance. http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/CIVIS%20SECONDARY%20CITIES_Final.pdf
  24. UNDESA. (2002). World urbanization prospects: The 2001 revision, data tables and highlights. New York: UNDESA.Google Scholar
  25. UNDESA. (2010). World urbanization prospects, the 2009 revision: Highlights. New York: UNDESA.Google Scholar
  26. UNDESA. (2011). World urbanization prospects, the 2011 revision. New York: UNDESA.Google Scholar
  27. UN-HABITAT. (2010). State of the world’s cities 2010/2011: Bridging the urban divide. Nairobi: UN-HABITAT.Google Scholar
  28. United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Human development report: Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  29. White, M. J., & Lindstrom, D. P. (2005). Internal migration. In D. L. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population (pp. 311–346). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. White, M. J., Mberu, M. U., & Collinson, M. (2008). African urbanization: Recent trends and implications. In G. Martine, G. McGranahan, M. Montgomery, & R. Fernandez-Castilla (Eds.), The new global frontier: Cities, poverty and environment in the 21st century (pp. 301–316). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loren B Landau
    • 1
  1. 1.African Centre for Migration & SocietyUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations