Advertisement

Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate

  • Arnauld Villers
  • Jochen Walz
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter on prostate surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy describes anatomic points and practical surgical options of fascial dissection. Clear understanding of the periprostatic fascia helps in identifying the correct planes of surgical dissection and in communication between surgeons. Results are related to the identification of the multilayered prostatic fascia (PF), which permits definition of dissection planes for complete oncologic excision of the prostate and preservation of both the external urinary sphincter responsible for urinary continence and the autonomic nerves responsible for erectile function and urinary control.

Keywords

Prostate Prostate cancer Anatomy Neurovascular bundle Sphincter Radical prostatectomy Erectile dysfunction Urinary incontinence Urethra 

References

  1. 1.
    Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):179–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Kaouk J, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol. 2016;70(2):301–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rassweiler J, Laguna P, Chlosta P, Pansadoro V, Gaboardi F, Stolzenburg JU, et al. ESUT expert group on laparoscopy proposes uniform terminology during radical prostatectomy: we need to speak the same language. Eur Urol. 2013;64(1):97–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int. 2004;94(7):1071–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takenaka A, Hara R, Soga H, Murakami G, Fujisawa M. A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy, based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers. BJU Int. 2005;95(6):766–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walsh PC, Partin AW. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Peters CA, Novick AC, Partin AW, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology, vol. 3. 9th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. p. 2956–78.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Myers RP, Villers A. Anatomic considerations in radical prostatectomy. In: Kirby RS, Partin AW, Feneley M, Kellogg Parsons J, editors. Prostate cancer; principles and practice, vol. 1. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis; 2006. p. 701–13.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):629–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M, Sarle R, Vallancien G, Delmas V, et al. An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2003;43(5):444–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Graefen M, Walz J, Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2006;49(1):38–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Budaus L, Isbarn H, Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Haese A, Steuber T, et al. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2009;56(2):317–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol. 2005;174(6):2291–6. discussion 6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Secin FP, Karanikolas N, Gopalan A, Bianco FJ, Shayegan B, Touijer K, et al. The anterior layer of Denonvilliers’ fascia: a common misconception in the laparoscopic prostatectomy literature. J Urol. 2007;177(2):521–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nielsen ME, Schaeffer EM, Marschke P, Walsh PC. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2557–64. discussion 64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ganzer R, Stolzenburg JU, Neuhaus J, Weber F, Burger M, Brundl J. Is the striated urethral sphincter at risk by standard suture ligation of the dorsal vascular complex in radical prostatectomy? An anatomic study. Urology. 2014;84(6):1453–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Villers A, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Boccon-Gibod L, Stamey TA. Invasion of Denonvilliers’ fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 1993;149(4):793–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muraoka K, Hinata N, Morizane S, Honda M, Sejima T, Murakami G, et al. Site-dependent and interindividual variations in Denonvilliers’ fascia: a histological study using donated elderly male cadavers. BMC Urol. 2015;15:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Ophoven A, Roth S. The anatomy and embryological origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers: a medico-historical debate. J Urol. 1997;157(1):3–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kourambas J, Angus DG, Hosking P, Chou ST. A histological study of Denonvilliers’ fascia and its relationship to the neurovascular bundle. Br J Urol. 1998;82(3):408–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Villers A, Stamey TA, Yemoto C, Rischmann P, McNeal JE. Modified extrafascial radical retropubic prostatectomy technique decreases frequency of positive surgical margins in T2 cancers <2 cm (3). Eur Urol. 2000;38(1):64–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McNeal JE, Villers AA, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Capsular penetration in prostate cancer. Significance for natural history and treatment. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990;14(3):240–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, Robinson BD, Shevchuk MM, Durand M, et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int. 2011;108(6 Pt 2):984–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Myers RP. Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy--anatomic and surgical commentary. Urology. 2002;59(4):472–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yucel S, Baskin LS. Neuroanatomy of the male urethra and perineum. BJU Int. 2003;92(6):624–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McNeal JE. The prostate and prostatic urethra: a morphologic synthesis. J Urol. 1972;107(6):1008–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyCHU Lille, Univ Lille Nord de FranceLilleFrance
  2. 2.Department of UrologyInstitut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer CentreMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations