Advertisement

Surgical Protocol for the Placement of the Zygomatic Implant: A Graftless Approach for Treatment of the Edentulous Maxilla

  • Edmond BedrossianEmail author
  • Per-Ingvar Brånemark
Chapter
Part of the BDJ Clinician’s Guides book series (BDJCG)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this chapter is to review the surgical protocol for the use of the zygoma implant to establish posterior support for the edentulous maxillae.

Method: Review of the literature for the reconstruction of the edentulous maxillae using both the grafting and the graftless approach.

Results: The use of the zygoma implant with and without immediate loading protocols has shown to be a predictable treatment concept.

Conclusion: The result of this contemporary review of the various techniques for the reconstruction of the edentulous maxilla suggests that placement of the two zygoma implants (ad modum Branemark) in conjunction with 2–4 premaxillary implants, rigidly connected and stabilized with a fixed prosthesis, allows for the favourable force distribution during function with long-term success of the implants and prosthesis.

Keywords

Zygoma Zygomatic Surgical protocol zygoma implant Biomechanics ad modum Branemark Extra-sinus Implant Maxillary reconstruction 

References

  1. 1.
    Adell R, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breine U, Branemark PI. Reconstruction of alveolar jaw bone. An experimental and clinical study of immediate and performed autologous bone grafts in combination with osseointegrated implants. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;14:23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Issaksson S, et al. Early results from reconstruction of severely atrophic (class VI) maxillas by immediate endosseous implants in conjunction with bone grafting and Lefort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;22:144–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adell R, et al. Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:233–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Isaksson S, Alberius P. Maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation with onlay bone grafts and immediate endosseous implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992;20:2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jensen OT, et al. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(suppl 1):11–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tolman DE. Reconstructive procedures with endosseous implants in grafted bone: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:275–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keller E, Tolman DE, Eckert SE. Maxillary antral-nasal inlay autogenous bone graft reconstruction of compromised maxillae: a 12-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:707–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rasmusson L, et al. The influence of simultaneous versus delayed placement on stability of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts. A histologic and biomechanic study in rabbit. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;28:224–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fortin Y, Sullivan RM, Rangert BR. The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4:69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krekmanov L, et al. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:405–14.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and Periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3(1):39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stevenson ARL, Austin BW. Zygomatic fixtures—the Sydney experience. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2000;15:337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Higuchi KW. The zygomatic fixture: an alternative approach for implant anchorage in the posterior maxilla. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2000;15:28–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bedrossian E, Stumpel LJ. The zygomatic implant: preliminary data on treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:861–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malevez C, et al. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: a 6-48 month follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;115:18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Branemark PI, et al. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38:70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aparicio C, et al. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8:114–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bedrossian E. Rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with the zygoma concept: a 7-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:1213–12215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aparicio Aparicio C, et al. The long-term use of zygomatic implants: a 10-year clinical and radiographic report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:447–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bedrossian E, concept R. Rescue implant concept: the expanded use of the zygoma implant in the graftless solutions. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2011;23:257–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chrcanovic BR, et al. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;17:81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goiato MC. Implants in the zygomatic bone for maxillary prosthetic rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:748–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bedrossian E, et al. Fixed prosthetic implant restoration of the edentulous maxilla: a systematic pretreatment evaluation method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nkenke E, et al. Anatomic site evaluation of the zygomatic bone for dental implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:72–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aparicio C. A proposed classification for zygomatic implant patients based on the zygoma anatomy guided approach (ZAGA): a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4(3):269–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ujigawa K. Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:620–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Freedman M, Ring M, Stassen LFA. Effect of alveolar bone support on zygomatic implants: a finite element analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42:671–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Freedman M, Ring M, Stassen LFA. Effect of alveolar bone support on zygomatic implants in an extra-sinus position—a finite element analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:785–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bedrossian E, Stumpel L. Immediate stabilization at phase II of zygomaticus fixtures: a simplified technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(1):10–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chow J, et al. Zygomatic implants-protocol for immediate loading: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:804–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brånemark P-I, Hansson B, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, et al. Oseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Stockholm: Alqvist & Wiksell International; 1977.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brånemark P-I, Zarb G, Albrektsson T (eds). Prosthodontic procedures. In: Tissue-integrated prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bedrossian E, Branemark PI, Oral & maxillofacial surgery, Vol 1, Chapter 29, Fonseca, 2nd ed. Saunders: Elsevier; P. 491-500.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moraes E. Closure of oralantral communication with buccal fat pad flap in zygomatic implant surgery: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:143–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moraes E. The buccal fat pad flap: an option to prevent and treat complications regarding complex zygomatic implant surgery. Preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:905–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bedrossian E, et al. Immediate function with the zygomatic implant-a graftless solution for the patient with mild to advanced atrophy of the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;21:1–6.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhao Y, Skalak R, Branemark PI. Analysis of a dental prosthesis supported by zygomatic fixtures. Gothenberg: The Institute for Applied Biotechnology.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Balshi TJ. The Biotes conversion prosthesis: a provisional fixed prosthesis supported by osseointegrated titanium fixtures for restoration of the edentulous jaws. Quintessence Int. 1985;16:667–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Swerdlow H. Vertical dimension literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1965;15:241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Frush J, Fisher R. Introduction to dentogenic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1955;11:586–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rothman R. Phonetic considerations in denture prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;11:214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gapski R, et al. Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:515–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van Steenberghe D, et al. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:663–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American Board of Oral & Maxillofacial SurgeryChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Oral & Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of DentistrySan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Implant Surgical TrainingUniversity of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of DentistrySan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.American College of ProsthodonticsSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.The Brånemark Osseointegration Center (BOC)GothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations