Advertisement

A Critical Approach to Teaching Financial Economics

  • Luigi Ventimiglia
Chapter

Abstract

Finance is usually perceived as a set of quantitative techniques aimed at maximising profit and minimising risk. In this respect then, the quality of teaching financial economics is considered to be proportional to the number of techniques students are able to master. This chapter argues that finance can be taught by using a new approach, namely, the Teaching with Historical Perspectives. By using a historical perspective, this approach encourages a deeper understanding of financial theory. The chapter will provide some specific examples to illustrate the above points. The chapter concludes by reflecting on the teaching practice of mainstream finance and suggests that this can provide an opportunity to develop a critical perspective towards financial theory.

References

  1. Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, P. L. (1992). Capital ideas: The improbable origins of modern wall street. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Black, F., Jensen, M. C., & Scholes, M. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests. In M. C. Jensen (Ed.), Studies in the theory of capital markets. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, B. S. (1994). Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  5. Breeden, D. (1979). An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 265–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, N., Roll, R., & Ross, S. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. Journal of Business, 59(3), 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chopra, N., Lakonishok, J., & Ritter, J. R. (1992). Measuring abnormal performance: Do stocks overreact? Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conrad, J., & Kaul, G. (1988). Time-variation in expected returns. Journal of Business, 61(4), 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cootner, P. H. (1964). The random character of stock market prices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cowles, A. (1933). Can stock market forecasters forecast? Econometrica, 1(3), 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowles, A. (1960). A revision of previous conclusions regarding stock price behavior. Econometrica, 28(4), 909–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crotty, J. (2013). The realism of assumptions does matter: Why Keynes–Minsky theory must replace efficient market theory as the guide to financial regulation policy. In G. Epstein & M. Wolfson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of the political economy of financial crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Douglas, G. W. (1969). Risk in the equity markets: An empirical appraisal of market efficiency. Yale Economic Essays, 9(1), 3–48.Google Scholar
  14. Dowd, K., Cotter, J., Humphrey, C., & Woods, M. (2008). How unlucky is 25-sigma? arXiv preprint: 1103.5672. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1103/1103.5672.pdf
  15. Epstein, G. A. (Ed.). (2005). Financialization and the world economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. Fama, E. F. (1970a). Multiperiod consumption-investment decisions. The American Economic Review, 60, 163–174.Google Scholar
  17. Fama, E. F. (1970b). Efficient capital market: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the return on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. (1973). Risk, return and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Financial Times. (2007, August 14). Goldman pays the price of being big.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, M. C. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Groenewegen, J. (2007). Teaching pluralism in economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Hakansson, N. (1974). Convergence in multiperiod portfolio choice. Journal of Financial Economics, 1, 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heaton, J., & Lucas, D. (2000). Portfolio choice and asset prices: The importance of entrepreneurial risk. Journal of Finance, 55(3), 1163–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jagannathan, R., & Wang, Z. (1996). The conditional CAPM and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stick market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jovanovic, F. (2008). The construction of the canonical history of financial economics. History of Political Economy, 40(2), 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kendall, M. G. (1953). The analysis of economic time-series—Part 1: Prices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 116, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keynes, J. M. (1930). Treatise of money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Keynes, J. M. (1973). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Kilborn, P. T. (1988). “Fresh water” economists gain. New York Times, 23 July. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/23/business/fresh-water-economists-gain.html?pagewanted¼all&src¼pm
  33. Krugman, P. (2009). How did economists get it so wrong? New York Times, 6 September. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?pagewanted¼all
  34. Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1995). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. Journal of Finance, 50(5), 541–578.Google Scholar
  35. Lavoie, M. (1999). The credit-led supply of deposits and the demand for money: Kaldor’s reflux mechanism as previously endorsed by Joan Robinson. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(1), 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lintner, J. (1965). Security prices, risk and maximal gains from diversification. Journal of Finance, 20(4), 587–615.Google Scholar
  37. Lippert, J. (2008). John Lippert on the Chicago School. Bloomberg, 23 December. Retrieved from http://delong.typepad.com/egregious_moderation/2008/12/john-lippert-on-the-chicago-school.html
  38. Lo, A. W., & Mackinlay, A. G. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walk: Evidence from a simple specification test. Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lucas, R. (1978). Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica, 46(6), 1429–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malkiel, B. G. (1995). Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971 to 1991. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
  42. Mayers, D. (1972). Nonmarketable assets and capital market equilibrium under uncertainty. In M. C. Jensen (Ed.), Studies in the theory of capital markets. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  43. McLeay, M., Radia, A., & Thoms, R. (2014). Money creation in the modern economy. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin. First quarter, 15–16.Google Scholar
  44. Merton, R. C. (1992). Continuous-time finance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Miller, M. H., & Scholes, M. (1972). Rates of return in relation to risk: A re-examination of some recent findings. In M. C. Jensen (Ed.), Studies in the theory of capital markets. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  46. Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roll, R. (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests part I: On past and potential testability of the theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ross, S. A. (1976). Return, risk and arbitrage. In I. Friend & J. Bicksler (Eds.), Risk and return in finance. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  49. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.Google Scholar
  50. Sharpe, W. F. (1967). A simplified model of portfolio analysis. Management Science, 13, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sheikh, A. Z., & Qiao, H. (2009). Non-normality of market returns: A framework for asset-allocation decision-making. New York: J.P. Morgan Asset Management.Google Scholar
  52. Soros, G. (2009). The crash of 2008 and what it means: The new paradigm for financial markets. New York: Perseus.Google Scholar
  53. Stambaugh, R. F. (1982). On the exclusion of assets from tests of the two-parameter model: A sensitivity analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 10(3), 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tavasci, D., & Ventimiglia, L. (2018). Teaching the history of economic thought: Integrating historical perspectives into modern economics. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  55. Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity preference as behavior toward risk. Review of Economic Studies, 25, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Working, H. (1956). New ideas and methods for price research. Journal of Farm Economics, 38, 1427–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigi Ventimiglia
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economics and FinanceQueen Mary UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations