Advertisement

Being Inside: Masculine Imaginaries, Prison Interiors

  • Rod Earle
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology book series (PSIPP)

Abstract

Drawing on personal experience of imprisonment and from ethnographic research in men’s prisons, I explore some of the existential predicaments of imprisonment that may be peculiar to men. The situation of the prisoner is unique in throwing men together into an involuntary, highly regulated and confined community. The proximities and intimacies involved represent a paradoxical challenge to conventional notions of insular and autonomous masculinity. The formal institutionalisation of homosociality in prison life (i.e. life lived almost exclusively among other men) generates ironic tensions with the informal way men’s public lives often exclude women. This experience can take men in prison inside their own lives in unexpected ways. Differing experiences of gender, race, class and ethnicity shape this journey, and how men think about prison and their own relationship to wider society on the outside. In this chapter, I reflect on ongoing work within Convict Criminology (Earle 2016) that encourages academic reflexivity among those who combine experience of imprisonment and careers in criminology.

Keywords

Masculinities Prison Autoethnography Convict criminology Gender Post-colonial 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the editors for helpful feedback on an earlier draft of this paper and acknowledge their contribution to improving its final form.

References

  1. Adams, T., Holman Jones, S., & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, C. (2000). The Asian gang: Ethnicity, identity, masculinity. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  3. Alper, B. (1968). Borstal briefly revisited – Recollections and some related reflections. British Journal of Criminology, 6(12), 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayete-Nyampong, L. (2015). Changing hats – Transiting between practitioner and researcher roles. In R. Earle, D. Drake, & J. Sloan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  5. Behan, B. (1958). Borstal boy. London: Hutchison.Google Scholar
  6. Beier, A. L. (1985). Masterless men: The vagrancy problem in England 1560–1640. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  7. Benhabib, S. (1987). The generalised and concrete other: The Kohlberg/Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique: On the politics of gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bochner, A. (2007). Notes toward an ethics of memory in autoethnographic inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge (pp. 197–208). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bordo, S. (2003). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, D. (2007). A commissioner calls: Alexander Paterson and colonial Burma’s prisons. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 38(2), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler, J., & Gambetti, Z. (2016). Vulnerability in resistance. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlen, P. (1983). Women’s imprisonment. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Carlen, P., & TchaiKovsky, C. (1996). Women’s imprisonment in England at the end of the twentieth century. In R. Matthews & P. Francis (Eds.), Prisons 2000. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Castoriadis, C. (1997). The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chapman, R., & Rutherford, J. (1989). Male order: Unwrapping masculinity. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  16. Comfort, M. (2008). The best seven years I could’a done’: The reconstruction of imprisonment as rehabilitation. In P. Carlen (Ed.), Imaginary penalties (pp. 252–274). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Condry, R., Kotova, A., & Minson, S. (2016). Social injustice and collateral damage: The families and children of prisoners. In B. Crewe & Y. Jewkes (Eds.), The handbook of prisons. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, R. W. (1983). Which way is up – Essays on sex, class and culture. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  19. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. Crewe, B. (2011). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment and Society, 13(5), 509–529. for special issue on ‘Revisiting the pains of imprisonment’, In B. Crewe, Y. Jewkes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Du Bois, W. E. B. (1994/1903). The souls of Black folk. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Earle, R. (2011). Boys’ zone stories: Perspectives from a young men’s prison. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Earle, R. (2014). Inside white – Racism, social relations and ethnicity in an English prison. In C. Phillips & C. Webster (Eds.), New directions in race, ethnicity and crime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Earle, R. (2015). Of prison ethnography – Introduction to part III. In R. Earle, D. Drake, & J. Sloan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  26. Earle, R. (2016). Convict criminology – Inside and out. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ehrenreich, B. (1983). The hearts of men: American dreams and the flight from commitment. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  28. Ehrenreich, B. (2011). Blood rites: The origins and history of the passions of war. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  29. Fox, L. (1952). The English prison and Borstal systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Gay, P. (1993). The cultivation of hatred: The bourgeois experience- Victoria to Freud. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  31. Gill, R., Henwood, K., & McLean, C. (2005). Body projects and the regulation of normative masculinity. Body & Society, 11(1), 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gilson, E. (2014). The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Hage, G. (2003). Paranoid nationalism: Searching for hope in a shrinking society. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
  34. Hall, S. (2012). Theorising crime and deviance – A new perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Hallsworth, S., & Silverstone, D. (2009). ‘That’s life innit’: A British perspective on guns, crime and social order. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 9(3), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. James, E. (2003). A life inside: A prisoner’s notebook. London: Guardian Books.Google Scholar
  37. James, E. (2005). The home stretch: From prison to parole. London: Guardian Books.Google Scholar
  38. James, E. (2013). Foreword. In G. Creer, H. Priest, & T. Spargo (Eds.), Free to write: Prison voices past and present. Wirral: Headland Publications.Google Scholar
  39. James, E. (2016). Redeemable: A memoir of darkness and hope. London: Bloomsbury Circus.Google Scholar
  40. Jefferson, T. (1995). Theorising masculine subjectivity’ prison. In T. Newburn & E. Stanko (Eds.), Just boys doing business. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Karras, R. (2003). From boys to men: Formations of masculinity in late medieval Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  42. Marx, K. (1969). Theses on Feuerbach (thesis 11). Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848/2014). The communist manifesto. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  44. Massey, D. (1991, June). A global sense of place. Marxism Today, 38, 24–29.Google Scholar
  45. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  46. Morrison, W. (1996). Modernity, imprisonment and social solidarity. In R. Matthews & P. Francis (Eds.), Prisons 2000. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Negri, A. (2015). Pipeline – Letters from prison. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pfeil, F. (1995). White guys – Studies in postmodern domination and difference. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  49. Pitts, J. (2008). Reluctant gangsters: The changing face of youth crime: The changing shape of youth crime. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  50. Retort. (2004, May–June). Afflicted powers: The state, the spectacle and September 11. New Left Review, 27, 5–21.Google Scholar
  51. Roper, M., & Tosh, J. (1991). Manful assertions. Masculinities in Britain since 1800. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Rose, G. (1993). Medieval masculinities discussion archive. http://www8.georgetown.edu/departments/medieval/labyrinth/e-center/interscripta/archive2.htmlwww.masculintites. Accessed 24 Oct 2008.
  53. Said, E. (1990). Narrative and geography. New Left Review, 180, 81–100.Google Scholar
  54. Sim, J. (1994). Tougher than the rest: Men in prison. In T. Newburn & E. Stanko (Eds.), Just boys doing business. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time: The fault of Epimetheus no. 1. New York: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Stiegler, B. (2008). Acting out. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Theweleit, K. (1987). Male fantasies volume 1: Women, floods, bodies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  59. Toch, H. (1998). Hypermasculinity and prison violence. Masculinities and violence. In L. Bowker (Ed.), Masculinities and violence. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Tosh, J. (1999). A man’s place: Masculinity and the middle-class home in Victorian England. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tosh, J. (2005). Masculinities in an industrialising society, 1800–1914. Journal of British Studies, 44, 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wacquant, L. (2007). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  63. Wacquant, L. (2009a). Punishing the poor. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wacquant, L. (2009b). Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  65. Zizek, S. (2015). Trouble in paradise: From the end of history to the end of capitalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rod Earle
    • 1
  1. 1.The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations