Urban Policies for Urban Sustainability and Quality of Life of the City

  • Rosalba D’Onofrio
  • Massimo Sargolini
  • Michele Talia
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Despite the prolonged, unbridled process of urbanization that has concentrated 53% of the world’s population and more than 73% of the European population in cities, the confirmation of an Urban Agenda on the international level is still struggling to take off. As has been highlighted many times, this disappointing result stands in open contrast to the many initiatives assumed in recent decades by the United Nations and the European Commission, so that national governments have almost worked alone and in a convergent way over this period to maintain control of their respective urban policies (Boni 2016).

References

  1. Bacchini F, Baldazzi B, Morrone A, Savioli M, Sorvillo M P and Tinto A (2016) Un framework integrato per la misurazione del benessere e la sostenibilità in Italia. In: Working Papers. Rivista on line di Urban@it, 2016, 2Google Scholar
  2. Boni AL (2016) L’Agenda Urbana per l’UE: un nuovoi inizio per le città? In: Working Papers. Rivista on line di Urban@it, 2016, 2Google Scholar
  3. Commission of the European Communities (2006) Communication from the commission to the council and parliament. Cohesion policy and cities: the urban contribution to growth and jobs in the regions. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/urban/com_2006_0385_en.pdf. Accessed 8 Dec 2016
  4. European Commission (2016) Flash eurobarometer 419 – quality of life in european cities 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/urban/survey2015_en.pdf. Accessed 8 Dec 2016
  5. European Union (2011) Cities of tomorrow. Challenges, visions, ways forward. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/citiesoftomorrow/citiesoftomorrow_final.pdf
  6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2002) Pressure-state-response framework and environmental indicators. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/lead/toolbox/refer/envindi.htm. Accessed 15 Oct 2014
  7. Gavrilidis AA, Ciocănea CM, Niţă MR, Onose DA, Năstase II (2016) Urban landscape quality index- planning tool for evaluating urban landscapes and improving the quality of life. Procedia Environ Sci 32(2016):155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hiremath RB, Balachandra P, Kumar B, Bansode SS, Murali J (2013) Indicator-based urban sustainability—a review. Energy Sustain Dev 17(6):555–563. Accessed 23 May 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pissourios IA (2013) An interdisciplinary study on indicators: a comparative review of quality-of-life, macroeconomic, environmental, welfare and sustainability indicators. Ecol Indic 34:420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi J (2009) Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalba D’Onofrio
    • 1
  • Massimo Sargolini
    • 1
  • Michele Talia
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Architecture and DesignUniversity of CamerinoAscoli PicenoItaly

Personalised recommendations