• Helen T. Allan
  • Anne Arber


This book is about researchers’ experiences of doing emotional reflexivity in health and social care settings. While reflexivity has become an integral part of research practice and supervision (Seale, 1999) and a defining feature of qualitative research (Finlay, 2002), questions remain about how to go about doing reflexivity. Researchers in health and social care like other researchers are part of the social worlds they study. They may have multiple identities such as practitioner, counsellor as well as researcher, and they may be motivated to research in certain areas because they have experienced illness themselves. Researchers’ experiences, interactions, emotional involvement and reflections on what they observe form parts of the research process, data analysis and the written account, and are the means by which knowledge is developed (Hammersley, 1992).


  1. Allan, H. T. (2011). Using psycho-dynamic small group work in nurse education: Closing the theory-practice gap? Nurse Education Today, 31(5), 521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, D. (2004). Ethnomethodological insights into insider-outsider relationships. Nursing Inquiry, 11(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kindera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 304–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D. (1993). Introduction 1, the context. In D. Bell, P. Caplan, & J. W. Karim (Eds.), Gendered fields, women, men and ethnography (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bloor, M., Fincham, B., & Sampson, H. (2007). Commissioned inquiry into the risk to well-being of researchers in qualitative research. Cardiff: Qaultiti (NCRM).Google Scholar
  6. Boden, Z. V. R., Gibson, S., Owen, G. J., & Benson, O. (2016). Feelings and intersubjectivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1078–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cain, C. (2012). Emotions and the research interview: What hospice workers can teach us. Health Sociology Review, 21(4), 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Down, S., Garrety, K., & Badham, R. (2006). Fear and loathing in the field: Emotional dissonance and identity work in ethnographic research. Management, 9(3), 87–107.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, A., Periera, D., & Parker, J. (2012). Categorising the nurse-researcher during fieldwork: ‘One of us’ or ‘one of them’? Journal of Research in Nursing, 18(8), 707–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finken, S. (2000). Bringing ethnography home, reflections upon a style of enquiry. Retrieved March 1, 2016, from
  11. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gobo, G., & Marciniak, L. T. (2016). What is ethnography? In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 103–120). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Hammersley, M. (1992). On feminist methodology. Sociology, 26(2), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialisation of human feeling. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Holland, J. (2007). Emotions and research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(3), 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holland, J. (2008). Emotions and research: Some general and personal thoughts. In S. Weller & C. Caballero (Eds.), Up close and personal: Relationships and emotions within and through research (pp. 11–12). Families & Social Capital Research Group Working Paper No. 25, South Bank University, London. Retrieved from
  18. Hubbard, G., Backett-Milburn, K., & Kemmer, D. (2010). Working with emotions: Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hughes, N., & Arber, A. (2008). The lived experience of patients with pleural mesothelioma. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 14, 66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobs, M. (1999). Psychodynamic counselling in action (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Jaggar, A. (1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In S. Bordo & A. Jaggar (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. New Brunswick; London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Neuman, C. B., & Neumann, I. B. (2015). Uses of the self: Two ways of thinking about scholarly situatedness and method. Millennium, Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 798–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis or sure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramsay, K. (1996). Emotional labour and qualitative research: How I learned not to laugh or cry in the field. In E. S. Lyon & J. Busfield (Eds.), Methodological imaginations (pp. 131–1460). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robertson, M., & Boyle, J. (1984). Ethnography: Contributions to nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 9(1), 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenberg, M. (1990). Reflexivity and emotions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Savage, J. (2003). Participative observation. In J. Latimer (Ed.), Advanced qualitative research for nursing (pp. 53–76). Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Seale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vinten, G. (1994). Participant observation: A model for organisational investigation? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 9(2), 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  31. Williams, A. (1990). Reflections on the making of an ethnographic text. Studies in Sexual Politics, No. 29. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen T. Allan
    • 1
  • Anne Arber
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Adult, Child, MidwiferyMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.University of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations