Advertisement

Template Analysis in Business and Management Research

  • Nigel King
  • Joanna Brooks
  • Saloomeh Tabari
Chapter

Abstract

Thematic methods of data analysis are widely used in qualitative organizational research. In this chapter, we will introduce you to Template Analysis (King and Brooks, Template Analysis for Business and Management Students. London: Sage, 2017), a particular style of thematic analysis that has been widely used in organizational and management research as well as in many other disciplines. We will begin by explaining how thematic approaches to data analysis are commonly used in qualitative organizational research, before moving on to present Template Analysis as an approach with particular utility in this field. We will then present a case study example to illustrate how Template Analysis is used by qualitative organizational researchers. In our conclusion, we will consider the overall strengths and weaknesses of the method and reflect on further developments which may extend the use of Template Analysis as a flexible form of thematic analysis with wide utility in qualitative organizational research.

Keywords

Template analysis Thematic analysis Coding Clustering 

References

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks, J., & King, N. (2014). Doing Template Analysis: Evaluating and End-of-Life Care Service. SAGE Research Methods Cases, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, J., & King, N. (Eds.). (2017). Applied Qualitative Research in Psychology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching Thematic Analysis: Overcoming Challenges and Developing Strategies for Effective Learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123.Google Scholar
  6. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frambach, J., Driessen, E., Beh, P., & Van der Vleuten, C. (2014). Quiet or Questioning? Students’ Discussion Behaviors In Student-Centred Education Across Cultures. Studies in Higher Education, 39(6), 1001–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, P. (2004). Analytic Induction. Using Data Matrices. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (pp. 165–179). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, P., Buehring, A., Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2006). Evaluating Qualitative Management Research: Towards a Contingent Criteriology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(3), 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. King, N., & Brooks, J. M. (2017). Template Analysis for Business and Management Students. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Maguire, J. S. (2008). Leisure and the Obligation of Self-Work: An Examination of the Fitness Field. Leisure Studies, 27(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nadin, S., & Cassell, C. (2004). Using Data Matrices. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (pp. 271–287). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pantelidis, I., & Wrobel, S. (2008). London’s Hospitality Workforce: Cultural Diversity a Choice or Necessity? London Journal of Tourism, Sport, and the Creative Industries, 1, 13–21.Google Scholar
  16. Radcliffe, L. S. (2013). Qualitative Diaries: Uncovering the Complexities of Work-Life Decision-Making. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 8(2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing Qualitative Data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, J. (2015). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The Psychologist, 28(8), 644–645.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method, Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Strauss, B., & Mang, P. (1999). Culture Shocks, Inter-Cultural Service Encounters. Journal of Service Marketing, 13, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Symon, G., & Cassell, C. (2012). Assessing Qualitative Research. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges (pp. 205–223). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Tabari, S., Wilson, J., & Ingram, H. (2016). Conceptualising the Impact of Culture and Language Upon Hospitality Service Management. Journal of Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 8(1), 18–28.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang, J., Beatty, S. E., & Walsh, G. (2005). Cross-Cultural Services Research: A Review of the Literature and Future Research Directions. In Proceedings of the 10th Cross-Cultural Research Conference, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nigel King
    • 1
  • Joanna Brooks
    • 2
  • Saloomeh Tabari
    • 3
  1. 1.University of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK
  2. 2.University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations