Advertisement

Robot Programming Through Whole-Body Interaction

  • Marta FerrazEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10423)

Abstract

Programmable and non-programmable educational robots are, in most cases, associated with sedentary behavior in children. Children interact with educational robots mostly in indoor environments. Whole-body interaction and natural environments seem to potentiate children’s physical and mental health. In order to potentiate children’s physical and mental health we have developed a new set of robotic devices - Biosymtic Robotic devices. We describe the main computational models of Biosymtic Robotic devices: a computational model demonstrating how to increase children’s physical activity levels and contact with natural environments through automatic feedback control mechanisms; a theoretical cognitive model on how to program robotic devices through whole-body interaction in natural environments.

Keywords

Child-robot interaction Whole-body interaction Physical and mental health Robot programming 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Bar-Cohen, Y., Breazeal, C.: Biologically inspired intelligent robotics. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures Conference, San Diego, CA, pp. 1–7 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barsalou, L.W.: Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22(4), 577–660 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boreham, C., Riddoch, C.: The physical activity, fitness and health of children. J. Sports Sci. 19(12), 915–929 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calinon, S., Billard, A.: What is the teacher’s role in robot programming by demonstration? Toward benchmarks for improved learning. Interact. Stud. 8(3), 441–464 (2007). Special Issue on Psychological Benchmarks in Human-Robot InteractionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaddock, L., Erickson, K.I., Prakash, R.S., Kim, J.S., Voss, M.W., Vanpatter, M., Kramer, A.F.: A neuroimaging investigation of the association between aerobic fitness, hippocampal volume and memory performance in preadolescent children. Brain Res. 1358, 172–183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Espinoza, R.R., Nalin, M., Wood, R., Baxter, P., Looije, R., Demiris, Y.: Child-robot interaction in the wild: advice to the aspiring experimenter. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI 2011, pp. 335–342. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Removed for blind review 2016Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Removed for blind review 2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grigore, E.C., Scassellati, B.: Maintaining engagement in shared goals with a personal robot companion through motivational state modeling. In: 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Portland, OR (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jensen, E.: Learning with the Body in the Mind: The Scientific Basis for Energizers, Movement, Play, Games, and Physical Education. The Brain Store, Inc., Chicago (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirstein, F., Risager, R.V.: Social robots in educational institutions. They came to stay: introducing, evaluating, and securing social robots in daily education. In: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2016, pp. 453–454. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meyer, J.-A., Guillot, A.: Biologically inspired robots. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1395–1422. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minsky, M.L.: Robotics. Omni Press Book, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    von Neumann, J.: Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. Burks, A.W. (ed.) University of Illinois Press, Urbana and London (1966)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Papert, S.: Mindstorms, Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, 2nd edn. Basic Books, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Piek, J.P., Dawson, L., Smith, L.M., Gasson, N.: The role of early fine and gross motor development on later motor and cognitive ability. Hum. Mov. Sci. 27(5), 668–681 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    World Health Organization 2013. Physical Activity and Young People. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_young_people/en/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biosymtic RoboticsAlmadaPortugal

Personalised recommendations