Advertisement

Alternatives to the Checklist

  • Stephan A. Munich
  • Michael Chen
Chapter

Abstract

Checklists have become increasingly advocated to improve patient safety in health care. While they may provide an unambiguous means of monitoring one’s completion of various tasks, excess preoccupation with a checklist may take focus away from recognizing the complexities of the patient, the unique and sometimes complicated disease process, and the health-care team dynamics. In this chapter, we discuss alternatives to the checklist by highlighting concepts and strategies that often incorporate checklists, but ultimately aim to provide a more comprehensive strategy to improving patient safety. We discuss the advanced safety culture, the crew resource management, the Lean philosophy, and the “pit-crew model.” Implementation of these processes in neuroendovascular surgery may provide a more engaged, sustainable, and continuously adaptable patient safety solution above and beyond what checklists provide.

References

  1. 1.
    Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomassen O, Storesund A, Softeland E, et al. The effects of safety checklists in medicine: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(1):5–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen M. A checklist for cerebral aneurysm embolization complications. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(1):20–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fargen KM, Velat GJ, Lawson MF, et al. Enhanced staff communication and reduced near-miss errors with a neurointerventional procedural checklist. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5(5):497–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anthes E. Hospital checklists are meant to save lives—so why do they often fail? Nature. 2015;523(7562):516–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hudson P. Applying the lessons of high risk industries to health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl 1):i7–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Health care at the crossroads. Strategies for improving the medical liability system and preventing patient injury. The Joint Commission. 2005. (White paper). http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Medical_Liability.pdf.
  8. 8.
    Truijens SE, Banga FR, Fransen AF, et al. The effect of multiprofessional simulation-based obstetric team training on patient-reported quality of care: a pilot study. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(4):210–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fargen KM, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, et al. Simulator based angiography education in neurosurgery: results of a pilot educational program. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4(6):438–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spiotta AM, Kellogg RT, Vargas J, et al. Diagnostic angiography skill acquisition with a secondary curve catheter: phase 2 of a curriculum-based endovascular simulation program. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(10):777–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wendell LC, et al. Abstract TP298: code stroke simulation training benefits junior neurology residents. Stroke. 2016;47(Suppl 1):ATP298.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miguel K, et al. Team training: a safer future for neurointerventional practice. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;3(3):285–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boet S, Bould MD, Fung L, et al. Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61(6):571–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gomez MA II, Hirsch JA, Stingley P, et al. Applying the lean management philosophy to neurointerventional radiology. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2(1):83–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rai AT, Smith MS, Boo S, et al. The ‘pit-crew’ model for improving door-to-needle times in endovascular stroke therapy: a Six-Sigma project. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(5):447–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Neurological Surgery, Neurology and RadiologyRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations