Advertisement

Diversity, Equality and Rights

  • Pere Ayling
Chapter

Abstract

Despite the numerous national (Equality Act 2010) and international (UNCRPD) laws that have been created over the decades to protect the rights of children and adults with impairments, studies have shown that disabled people do not yet enjoy full citizenship rights and are still perceived as not having equal worth as their non-disabled counterparts. This suggests that despite the paradigmatic shift in our understanding of disability as a social construct, individuals with impairments are still perceived as the “inferior other” and thus have often lived at the “margins of personhood” (Kittay 2005, p. 67 in Mojdeh Bayat 2015). The rhetoric of equality of rights in the UK and elsewhere does not appear to have translated into the acceptance and celebration of differences neither has it changed peoples’ perceptions of disabled persons. Rather, the characterisation of disabled people as scroungers in the media and within welfare policies demonstrated through the incessant assessing of disabled people for disability benefits seems to have to increase the negative views and treatment of children and adults with impairment.

References

  1. Allan, J. (2009). Teaching children to live with diversity: A response to ‘Tocqueville on democracy and inclusive education: A more ardent and enduring love of equality than of liberty’. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(3), 245–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayling, P. (2016). Diversity, equality and rights in early years. In L. Trodd (Ed.), The early years practitioner’s handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. (2013). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bayat, M. (2015). The stories of ‘snake children’: Killing and abuse of children with developmental disabilities in West Africa. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berga, D. H., & Schneider, C. (2012). Equality dichotomies in inclusive education: Comparing Canada and France. European Journal of Disability Research, 6, 124–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn, C., Spencer, N., & Read, J. (2010). Prevalence of childhood disability and the characteristics and circumstances of disabled children in the UK: Secondary analysis of the family resources survey. BMC Pediatrics [Online], 10(21), 1–12. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from file: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/3202/1/WRAP_Blackburn_Prevalence__childhhood_disability.pdf
  7. Browne, M., & Millar, M. (2016). A rights-based conceptual framework for the social inclusion of children and young persons with an intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 31(8), 1064–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassidy, W., & Jackson, M. (2005). The need for equality in education: An intersectionality examination of labelling and zero tolerance practices. McGill Journal of Education, 40(3), 435–455.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, M. (2014). The sublime objects of education policy: Quality, equity and ideology. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(4), 584–598.Google Scholar
  10. Clery, E., Tsang, T., & Vizard, P. (2014). The children’s measurement framework: A new indicator-based tool for monitoring children’s equality and human rights. Child Indicators Research, 7(2), 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Degener, T. (2014). A human rights model of disability. ResearchGate [Online]. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from file: https://www.academia.edu/18181994/A_human_rights_model_of_disability
  12. Equality Act 2010. (2014). Departmental advice for school leaders, school staff, governing bodies and local authorities [Online]. Retrieved May 2, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/315587/Equality_Act_Advice_Final.pdf
  13. Espinoza, O. (2007). Solving the equity–equality conceptual dilemma: A new model for analysis of the educational process. Educational Research, 49(4), 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Education Needs, 29(3), 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, M. (2000). The future of children’s rights. Children & Society, 14, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, E. (2005). The entangled geographies of social exclusion/inclusion for people with learning disabilities. Health and Place, 11(2), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Paralympic Committee. (2012). The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved February 25, 2017, from https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/document/120818093927291_2012_08%2BThe%2BUN%2BConvention%2Bon%2BRights%2Bof%2BPersons%2Bwith%2BDisabilities_ENG.pdf
  18. Johnston, J. (2010). Inclusive education: A model of equality. Education Law Journal, 20(2), 107–127.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, J. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Vietze, D. L. (2014). The psychology of diversity: Beyond prejudice and racism. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Kitching, K. (2011). Taking education risks with and without guaranteed identities: Freire’s ‘problem-posing’ and Judith Butler’s ‘troubling’. In A. O’Shea & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Pedagogy, oppression and transformation in a ‘post-critical’ climate: The return to freirean thinking (pp. 102–119). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. Kukathas, C. (2002). Equality and diversity. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 1(2), 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lang, R., Kett, M., Groce, N., & Trani, J. (2011). Implementing the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Principles, implications, practice and limitations. European Journal of Disability Research, 5, 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liasidou, A. (2016). Disabling discourses and human rights law: A case study based on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 149–162.Google Scholar
  24. Megret, F. (2008). The disabilities Convention: Towards a holistic concept of rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 30(2), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oyaro, L. O. (2015). Africa at crossroads: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. American University International Law Review, 30(2), 347–377.Google Scholar
  26. Papatheodorou, T. (2007). Difference, culture and diversity: Challenges, responsibilities and opportunities. In J. Moyles (Ed.), Early years foundations: Meeting the challenge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Parker, C. (2009). Valuing people now: A human rights perspective. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 14(2), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Penketh, C. (2014). Invention and repair: Disability and education after the UK Coalition Government. Disability & Society, 29(9), 1486–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Porter, J. (2016). Time for justice: Safeguarding the rights of disabled children. Disability & Society, 31(8), 997–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quinn, G. (2009). Bringing the UN Convention on rights for persons with disabilities to life in Ireland. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quinn, G., & Degener, T. (2002). The moral authority for change: Human rights values and the worldwide process of disability reform. In G. Quinn & T. Degener (Eds.), Human rights and disability (pp. 13–28). New York: United Nation.Google Scholar
  32. Riddell, S. (2009). Social justice, equality and inclusion in Scottish education. Discourse, 30(3), 283–297.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, A., Townsend, S., Morris, J., Rushbrooke, E., Greenhill, B., Whitehead, R., Mathews, T., & Golding, L. (2013). Treat me right, treat me equal: Using national policy and legislation to create positive changes in local health services for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 26(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sherry, M. (2016). A sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 31(6), 729–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Slee, R. (2008). Beyond special and regular schooling? An inclusive education reform agenda. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 18(2), 99116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slee, R., & Cook, S. (1999). The cultural politics of disability, education and the law. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20(2), 267–277.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, W. J., & Lusthaus, C. (1995). The nexus of equality and quality in education: A framework for debate. Canadian Journal of Education, 20(3), 378–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Squires, J. (2004). Equality and diversity: A new equality framework for Britain? ResearchGate [Online]. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from file: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242440318_Equality_and_Diversity_A_New_Equality_Framework_for_Britain
  39. Squires, J. (2007). Negotiating equality and diversity in Britain: Towards a differentiated citizenship? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 10(4), 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UNICEF. (2013). Legal frameworks, policies, programmes and practices for children and adolescents with disabilities in Latin American and Caribbean: Strengthening capacities to mainstream disabilities in UNICEF programming [Online]. Retrieved February 21, 2017, from https://www.unicef.org/lac/UNICEFLAC_Adolescents_with_Disabilities_Summary.pdf
  41. United Nations. (1993). Standard rules on the equalisation of opportunities for persons with disabilities [Online]. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/standard-rules-on-the-equalization-of-opportunities-for-persons-with-disabilities.html
  42. United Nation Convention for the Rights of People with Disability (UNCRPD). (2015). [Online]. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/ConventionRightsPersonsWithDisabilities.aspx
  43. Wildeman, S. (2013). Protecting rights and building capacities: Challenges to global mental health policy in light of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41(1), 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pere Ayling
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SuffolkIpswichUK

Personalised recommendations