Advertisement

Green Criminology as Decolonial Tool: A Stereoscope of Environmental Harm

  • David Rodríguez Goyes
Chapter

Abstract

While green criminology has grown in its scope and orientation, the field is still limited, being primarily practiced by Northern, and with publications written almost exclusively in English. In this chapter, I argue that because of its ability to study instances of environmental degradation, green criminology could be used as decolonial tool by identifying, exposing and confronting cases of colonial environmental discrimination, marginalization and exploitation. Using the example of Colombia, I argue that one way green criminology could aid the decolonial project of Southern criminology is by being a ‘stereoscopic tool’. This approach, while allowing for the recognition of colonial dynamics, also facilitates combining Western and Southern knowledge, ideally resulting in deeper analyses of both environmentally harmful practices and the potential and actual responses to them.

Keywords

Colonialism Decolonial project Green criminology Southern criminology Western science 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Mari Kvam, Hernando Rodríguez Palacino, Sveinung Sandverg, Ragnhild Sollund, John Todd, Tanya Wyatt and in general my colleagues in the Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law at the University of Oslo.

References

  1. Aas, K. F. (2007). Globalization & Crime. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Aas, K. F. (2012). The earth is one but the world is not: Criminological theory and its geopolitical divisions. Theoretical Criminology, 16(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480611433433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agozino, B. (2003). Counter-Colonial Criminology: A Critique of Imperialist Reason. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Agozino, B. (2004). Imperialism, crime and criminology: Towards the decolonisation of criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(4), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000025766.99876.4c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allende, I. (2002). City of the Beasts. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  6. Andreas, P., & Nadelmann, E. (2006). Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Aniyar de Castro, L. (1987). Criminología de la liberación. Maracaibo: Editorial de la Universidad de Zulia.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, M. (2013). Translation as an alternative space for political action. Social Movement Studies, 12(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.685624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck, U. (2006). La sociedad del riesgo, hacia una nueva modernidad (J. Navarro, D. Jiménez, & R. Borrás, Trans.). Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
  10. Benavides Vanegas, F. S. (2008). A global zero tolerance? Colombian prisons from a world historical perspective. Pensamiento Jurídico, 23, 173–202.Google Scholar
  11. Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry, T. (1999). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  13. Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2003). The Craft of Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bossi, J. (2011). De identidades y luchas: Entrevista con Ana María Spadafora. Mundo Amazónico, 2, 387–391.Google Scholar
  15. Brisman, A., & South, N. (2013). Introduction: Horizons, issues and relationships in green criminology. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology (pp. 1–24). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christie, N. (2016). Apartheid in modernity. Justice, Power and Resistance: The Journal of the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control, 1(1), 235–255.Google Scholar
  18. Davies, P., Francis, P., & Jupp, V. (Eds.). (1999). Invisible Crimes: Their Victims and Their Regulation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  19. Davies, P., Francis, P., & Wyatt, T. (Eds.). (2014). Invisible Crimes and Social Harms. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Deleuze, G. (1990). ¿Qué es un dispositivo? In G. Canguilhem (Ed.), Michel Foucault, Filósofo (pp. 155–163). Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  21. Demeulenaere, E. (2014). A political ontology of seeds: The transformative frictions of a farmers’ movement in Europe. Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 69, 45–61.Google Scholar
  22. de Sousa Santos, B. (2009). Para além do pensamento abissal: Das Linhas Globais a uma Ecologia de Saberes. In B. de Sousa Santos & M. P. Meneses (Eds.), Epistemologias do Sul (pp. 23–71). Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
  23. de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Escobar, A. (2003). Mundos y Conocimientos de otro Modo. El programa de investigación de modernidad/colonialidad latinoamericano. Tabula Rasa, 1, 51–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and knowledges otherwise: The Latin American modernity/coloniality research program. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Escobar, A. (2016). Thinking-feeling with the earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the South. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fals Borda, O. (1984). Resistencia en el San Jorge. Bogotá: Carlos Valencia Editores.Google Scholar
  28. Galtung, J. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2), 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garland, D. (2002). Of crimes and criminals: The development of criminology in great Britain. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (pp. 17–68). Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gomarasca, M. A. (2009). Basics of Geomatics. London and Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goyes, D. R. (2016). Green activist criminology and the epistemologies of the South. Critical Criminology, 24(4), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-016-9330-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goyes, D. R. (2017). Biopiracy from a green criminological perspective. Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law. Oslo, University of Oslo. PhD: 199.Google Scholar
  33. Goyes, D. R. (Forthcoming 2018). ‘Tactics rebounding’ in the Colombian defence of free seeds. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 7(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goyes, D. R., & Sollund, R. (2016). Contesting and contextualising CITES: Wildlife trafficking in Colombia and Brazil. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(4), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i4.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goyes, D. R., & South, N. (2016). Land-grabs, biopiracy and the inversion of justice in Colombia. The British Journal of Criminology, 56(3), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goyes, D. R. and N. South (2017). “‘Green Criminology before Green Criminology’: Amnesia and Absences.” Critical Criminology 25(2): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (2004). Introduction. In P. Hilliard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond Criminology, Taking Harm Seriously (pp. 1–9). London: Pluto Press & Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Holzner, B., Campbell, D. T., & Shahidullah, M. (1985). Introduction: The comparative study of science and the sociology of scientific validity. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 6(4), 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoyos Vásquez, G. (2006). Ciencia y Ética Desde una Perspectiva Discursiva. Convergencia, 13(42), 117–131.Google Scholar
  41. Jakobi, A. P. (2013). Common Goods and Evils? The Formation of Global Crime Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kemmerer, L. A., & Adams, C. J. (2011). Sister Species: Women, Animals and Social Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kloppenburg, J. (2010). Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: Biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00275.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krugly-Smolska, E. (1994). An examination of some difficulties in integrating Western science into societies with an indigenous scientific tradition. Interchange, 25(4), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kuhn, T. (2010). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas (Tercera, Ed., C. Solís, Trans.). México Distrito Federal: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  46. Lewis, A. G. (2012). Ethics, activism and the anti-colonial: Social movements research as resistance. Social Movement Studies, 11(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.664903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lugones, M. (2014). Rumo a um feminismo descolonial. Estudios Feministas, Florianópolis, 22(3), 935–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lynch, M. J. (2006). The greening of criminology: A perspective on the 1990s. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Green Criminology (pp. 165–170). Hampshire: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  49. Lynch, M. J., Long, M. A., Barret, K. L., & Stretesky, P. B. (2013). Is it a crime to produce ecological disorganization? British Journal of Criminology, 53(6), 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azt051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martínez-Torres, M. E., & Rosset, P. M. (2010). La Vía Campesina: The birth and evolution of a transnational social movement. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903498804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mol, H. (2013). ‘A gift from the tropics to the world’: Power, harm and palm oil. In R. Walters, D. Westerhuis, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Emerging Issues in Green Criminology: Exploring Power, Justice and Harm (pp. 242–206). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mol, H. (2015). To Miss the Forest for the Trees? A Green Criminological Perspective on the Politics of Palm Oil Harm. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
  53. Mol, H. (2016). ‘De respetar las etnias para que sean productivas’: Agroindustria, Daño Social y Ambiental, y Multiculturalismo Neoliberal. Revista Crítica Penal y Poder, 10, 53–82.Google Scholar
  54. Morrison, W. (2006). Criminology, Civilisation and the New World Order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Navarrete Cruz, Á. P. (2011). Una ciudadanía desgarrada: Configuración y ejercicio de una ciudadanía campesina en el corregimiento de San Joaquín. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  56. NESH. (2016). Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology. Oslo: The Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees.Google Scholar
  57. Park, C., & Allaby, M. (2013). A Dictionary of Environment and Conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pearce, F. (1976). Crimes of the Powerful. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  59. Potter, G. (in press). Green criminology as ecocriminology: Developing an ecologically-informed social science of crime. In H. Mol, D. R. Goyes, A. Brisman, & N. South (Eds.), Introducción a la Criminología Verde: Conceptos para la comprensión de los problemas socio-ambientales. Bogotá: Universidad Antonio Nariño.Google Scholar
  60. Potter, G. R. (2010). What is green criminology. Sociology Review, 20(2), 8–12.Google Scholar
  61. Pulido Londoño, H. A. (2011). Construcción y Representación de los Sujetos Afrocolombianos en el Discurso Antropológico 1980–2005. Bogotá: Magíster en Historia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  62. Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Raper, H. S. (1951). Stereoscopy. The Lancet, 258, 1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roggeband, C. (2007). Translators and transformers: International inspirations and exchange in social movements. Social Movement Studies, 6(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830701666947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sandberg, S. (2006). Fighting neo-liberalism with neo-liberal discourse: ATTAC Norway, Foucault and collective action framing. Social Movement Studies, 5(3), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830600991529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schwendinger, H., & Schwendinger, J. (1970). Defenders of order or guardians of human rights? Issues in Criminology, 5(2), 123–157.Google Scholar
  67. Sheptycki, J. (2016). Is green criminology paradigm-breaking? Some reflections on hydrocarbon and resource extraction, crime and criminological thinking. In T. Spappens, R. White, & W. Huisman (Eds.), Environmental Crime in Transnational Context; Global Issues in Green Enforcement and Criminology (pp. 67–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  69. Skloot, R. (2010). The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar
  70. Sollund, R. (2012a). Speciesism as doxic practice versus valuing difference and plurality. In R. Ellefsen, R. Sollund, & G. Larsen (Eds.), Global Crimes, Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges (pp. 91–113). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  71. Sollund, R. (2012b). The victimization of women, children and non-human species through trafficking and trade: Crimes understood under an ecofeminist perspective. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology (pp. 787–822). Londres: Routledge International Handbooks.Google Scholar
  72. Sollund, R. (2013a). Crimes against animal life. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 759–769). Tasmania: Springer.Google Scholar
  73. Sollund, R. (2013b). Animal trafficking and trade: Abuse and species injustice. In R. Walters, D. Westerhuis, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Emerging Issues in Green Criminology (pp. 72–92). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. South, N. (2007). The ‘corporate colonisation of nature’: Bio-prospecting, bio-piracy and the development of green criminology. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in Green Criminology: Confronting Harms Against Environments, Humanity and Other Animals (pp. 230–247). Devon: Willian.Google Scholar
  75. South, N. (2014). Green criminology: Reflections, connections, horizons. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(2), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v3i2.172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stretesky, P. B., Long, M. A., & Lynch, M. J. (2014). The Treadmill of Crime: Political Economy and Green Criminology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Tombs, S., & Hillyard, P. (2004). Towards a political economy of harm: States, corporations and the production of inequality. In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond Criminology, Taking Harm Seriously (pp. 30–54). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  78. Toro Pérez, C. (2012). Geopolítica energética: minería, territorio y resistencias sociales. In S. Coronado, L. T. Roa Avendaño, J. Ferro Morales, & C. Toro Pérez (Eds.), Minería, Territorio y Conflicto en Colombia (pp. 17–58). Bogotá: Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  79. Walters, R. (2004). Criminology and genetically modified food. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walters, R. (2011). Eco Crime and Genetically Modified Food. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Weber, M. (1997). Economía y sociedad: esbozo de sociología comprensiva (2nd ed., J. Winckelmann, Ed., J. Roura Parella, Trans.). Bogotá: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  82. White, R. (2008). Crimes Against Nature: Environmental Criminology and Ecological Justice. Oregon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. White, R. (2012). The foundations of eco-global criminology. In R. Ellefsen, R. Sollund, & G. Larsen (Eds.), Eco-Global Crimes, Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges (pp. 15–31). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  84. Wierzbicki, A. P. (2016). Systemic synthesis and metaphysics: Eastern versus Western thinking. In Y. Nakamori (Ed.), Knowledge Synthesis: Western and Eastern Cultural Perspectives (pp. 1–14). Tokyo, Japan: Springer.Google Scholar
  85. Wyatt, T. (2013). Wildlife Trafficking, A Deconstruction of the Crime, the Victims and the Offenders. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  86. Wyatt, T. (2014). Invisible pillaging: The hidden harm of corporate biopiracy. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Invisible Crimes and Social Harms (pp. 161–177). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  87. Ystehede, J. (2012). Constructing a meta-history of eco-global criminology: On brute criminologists, mortified bunnies, nature and its discontent. In R. Ellefsen, R. Sollund, & G. Larsen (Eds.), Eco-Global Crimes, Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges (pp. 57–67). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Rodríguez Goyes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Sociology of LawUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations