Contradictory Fiscal Governance in the European Union: Towards a Consolidation Empire?

  • Olli Herranen
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)


The European Union (EU) is an unprecedented coalition. On the one hand, it consists of sovereign countries with individual histories, cultures, legislation, institutions and languages, with little in common with one another; but on the other hand, it might also become, as the editors of this book suggest, the first economic empire in the history of humankind. After all, historically it has been built on an economic foundation, and the idea of the union is founded on a single internal market with the free movement of people, capital, goods and services. Furthermore, the launch of the Euro was ‘the first time in history that a currency common to more than 300 million people living in seventeen different countries was created from scratch, without a unified state behind it’ (Kouvelakis 2012: xvi).


  1. Abdelal, R., and M. Blyth. 2015. Just Who Put You in Charge? We Did: CRAs and the Politics of Rating. In Ranking the World. Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, ed. Alexander Cooley and Jack Snyder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, T.M. 2012. Fiscal Sustainability and Fiscal Policy Targets. Economic Working Papers 2012–15, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  3. Balassone, F., D. Franco, and S. Zotteri. 2006. EMU Fiscal Indicators: A Misleading Compass? Empirica 33 (2–3): 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro, R.J. 1974. Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1095–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 1989. The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (2): 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertocco, G. 2013. Money as an Institution of Capitalism: Some Notes on a Monetary Theory of Uncertainty. Economic Notes 42 (1): 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blyth, M. 2015. Austerity. The History of a Dangerous Idea. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J.M. 1976. Barro on the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 82 (2): 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buti, M., and G. Giudice. 2002. Maastricht’s Fiscal Rules at Ten: An Assessment. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (5): 823–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies, W. 2016. The New Neoliberalism. New Left Review 101: 121–134.Google Scholar
  11. De Grauwe, P. 2009. Economics of Monetary Union. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2011. European Monetary Union. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Online Edition. Accessed 24 Jan 2017.
  13. Delors, J. 1989. Regional Implications of Economic and Monetary Integration. In Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community. Collection of Papers Submitted to the Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union, European Committee: Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union, 81–90.Google Scholar
  14. Dillard, D. 1988. The Barter Illusion in Classical and Neoclassical Economics. Eastern Economic Journal 14 (4): 299–318.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. 1989. Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community, European Commission: Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2006. The Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances in the European Union, European Commission: European Economy, No 4/2006.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2013a. Vade Mecum on the Stability and Growth Pact, European Commission: European Economy, Occasional Papers 151, May. Brussels.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2013b. Building a Strengthened Fiscal Framework in the European Union: A Guide to the Stability and Growth Pact, European Commissions: European Economy, Occasional Papers 150, May. Brussels.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2015. On Broad Guidelines for the Economic Policies of the Member States and of the Union, European Commissions: Annex to the Recommendation for a Council Recommendation, COM (2015) 99 Final. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
  20. ———. 2017. Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission Website. Accessed 24 Mar 2017.
  21. Fine, B., and O. Dimakou. 2016. Macroeconomics. A Critical Companion. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, M. 1977. Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment. Journal of Political Economy 85 (3): 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graeber, D. 2011. Debt. The First 5000 Years. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, P.A. 2012. The Economics and Politics of the Euro Crisis. German Politics 21 (4): 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hallerberg, M., R. Strauch, and J. von Hagen. 2007. The Design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries. European Journal of Political Economy 23 (2): 338–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haug, W.F. 2011. Empire or Imperialism. Boundary 2 38 (2): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  28. Kouvelakis, S. 2012. Introduction. In Crisis in the Eurozone, ed. C. Lapavitsas et al. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Lapavitsas, C., et al. 2012. Crisis in the Eurozone. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Lazzarato, M. 2011. The Making of the Indebted Man. An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition. Trans. Joshua David Jordan, Semiotext(e)/Intervention Series 13. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Marglin, S.A., and P. Spiegler. 2013. Unpacking the Multiplier: Making Sense of Recent Assessment of Fiscal Stimulus Policy. Social Research 80 (3): 819–855.Google Scholar
  32. McKinnon, R.I. 1997. EMU as a Device for Collective Fiscal Retrenchment. The American Economic Review 87 (2): 227–229.Google Scholar
  33. McLeay, M. A. Radia, and R. Thomas. 2014. Money Creation in the Modern Economy, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2014 Q1. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
  34. McMenamin, I., M. Breen, and J. Munoz-Portillo. 2015. Austerity and Credibility in the Eurozone. European Union Politics 16 (1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell, W. 2015. Eurozone Dystopia. Groupthink and Denial on a Grand Scale. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mügge, D. 2016. Studying Macroeconomic Indicators as Powerful Ideas. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 410–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nello, S.S. 2005. The European Union: Economics, Policies and History. Glasgow: The McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  38. Oates, W.E. 2001. Fiscal Competition and European Union: Contrasting Perspectives. Regional Science and Urban Economics 31 (1): 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2005. Toward a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance 12 (1): 349–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schelkle, W. 2005. The Political Economy of Fiscal Policy Co-ordination in EMU: From Disciplinarian Device to Insurance Arrangement. Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (2): 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2006. EU Fiscal Governance: Hard Law in the Shadow of Soft Law. Columbia Journal of European Law 13 (3): 705–731.Google Scholar
  42. Semmler, W. 2013. The Macroeconomics of Austerity in the European Union. Social Research 80 (3): 883–915.Google Scholar
  43. Shaikh, A. 2016. Capitalism. Competition, Conflict, Crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stanley, T.D. 1998. New Wine in Old Bottles: A Meta-Analysis of Ricardian Equivalence. Southern Economic Journal 64 (3): 713–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Streeck, W. 2014. Buying Time. The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism (epub). Trans. Patrick Camiller. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2016. How Will Capitalism End? London: Verso.Google Scholar
  47. Streeck, W., and L. Elsässer. 2016. Monetary Disunion: The Domestic Politics of Euroland. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tuori, K., and K. Tuori. 2014. The Eurozone Crisis. A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. VM. 2013. Kooma-Model File. The Finnish Ministry of Finance. Accessed 24 Mar 2017.
  50. ———. 2015. Talouspolitiikan lähtökohdat, Valtiovarainministeriön virkamiespuheenvuoro [Premises for the Economic Policy. An Official Address of the Treasury], The Finnish Ministry of Finance, 13/2015.Google Scholar
  51. von Hagen, J., and G.B. Wolff. 2006. What Do Deficits Tell Us About Debt? Empirical Evidence on Creative Accounting with Fiscal Rules in the EU. Journal of Banking & Finance 30 (12): 3259–3279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wray, L.R. 2012. Modern Monetary Theory. A Primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Wyplosz, C. 2006. European Monetary Union: The Dark Sides of a Major Success. Economic Policy 21 (46): 208–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olli Herranen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations