Advertisement

Decentralisation, Democratisation and Delivery: English Sub-municipal Devolution

  • Colin Copus
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

Local government in England has a long tradition of experimentation with decentralisation and devolution within its own territorial boundaries. Those experiments have partly been driven by political values that favour passing functions and responsibilities from the town hall to local communities and partly by the need to compensate for the large scale of English local government. The creation of sub-municipal units takes a range of forms and purposes most of which are controlled, shaped and organised by the council which formed them and which can abolition them if it chooses. Parish and own councils stand unique among the sub-municipal units in English local government as they are statutory bodies with their own set of roles, powers and functions which are not the property of another municipality. The chapter explores the diverse nature of the types of sub-municipal units that exist in English local government and examines the contribution they make to service delivery, decision-making and local democracy.

References

  1. Aulich, C., Gibbs, M., Gooding, A., McKinlay, P., Pillora, S., & Sansom, G. (2011). Consolidation in Local Government: A Fresh Look. Ultimo: Open Publications of UTS Scholars.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, N. (2003). Local Strategic Partnerships in England: The Continuing Search for Collaborative Advantage, Leadership and Strategy in Urban Governance. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(4), 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A., & Sullivan, H. (2003). Constituting ‘The Public’ in Public Participation. Public Administration, 81(2), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belsky, J., Melhuish, E., & Barnes, J. (Eds.). (2007). The National Evaluation of Sure Start: Does Area-based Early Intervention Work? Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blackman, T. (1995). Urban Policy in Practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boaden, N., Goldsmith, M., Hampton, W., & Stringer, P. (1982). Public Participation in Local Services. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, D., Hambleton, R., & Hoggett, P. (1994). The Politics of Decentralisation. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chisholm, M., & Leach, S. (2008). Botched Business: The Damaging Process of Re-Organising Local Government, 2006–2008. Coleford: Douglas McLean.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, M., & Stewart, J. (1999). Community Governance, Community Leadership and the New Local Government. York: York Publishing Services.Google Scholar
  10. Copus, C. (2011). English Local Government: Reflecting a Nation’s Past or Merely an Administrative Convenience? In A. Aughey & C. Berberich (Eds.), These Englands (pp. 193–213). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Chap. 9.Google Scholar
  11. Copus, C. (2016). In Defence of Councillors. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damgaard, B., & Lewis, J. (2014). Involving Citizens in Accountability: Why and How. In Bovens, Goodin, & Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (pp. 258–272). Oxford: OUP. Chap. 16.Google Scholar
  13. De Groot, L. (1992). City Challenge: Competing in the Urban Regeneration Game. Local Economy, 7(3), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., & Rose, L. (2014). Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) and Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE). (2010). Guidance on Community Governance Reviews. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  16. Egner, B., Sweeting, D., & Klok, P.-J. (Eds.). (2013). Local Councillors in Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Galster, G. (2001). On the Nature of Neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2111–2124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, G., & Stewart, J. (2009). New Development: Accountability in Public Partnerships—The case of Local Strategic Partnerships. Public Money and Management, 29(1), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kersting, N., Caulfield, J., Nickson, A., Olowu, D., & Wollmann, H. (2009). Local Governance Reform in Global Perspective. Urban and Regional Research International. Wiesbaden: VS–Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kooiman, J. (2005). Governing as Governance. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How Low Can You Go? Rationales and Challenges for Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration, 86(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michael, X., Carpini, D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morlan, R. (1982). Sub-Municipal Governance in Practice: The Rotterdam Experience. The Western Political Quarterly, 35(3), 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morphet, J. (1987). Local Authority Decentralisation—Tower Hamlets goes all the way. Policy and Politics, 15(2), 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ormerod, P. (2005). The Impact of Sure Start. The Political Quarterly, 76, 565–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palmer, A. (1994). Providing Complex Local Authority Services in Competitive Markets—the Role of Arms-Length Organisations. Local Government Studies, 20(1), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Papadopoulos, Y. (2014). What is Multi-level Governance. In R. E. Goodin, M. Bovens, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Public Accountability (pp. 273–288). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chap. 17.Google Scholar
  28. Piotrowski, S., & Van Ryzin, G. (2007). Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pounds, N. (2000). A History of the English Parish: The Culture of Religion from Augustine to Victoria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Purdue, D. (2001). Neighbourhood Governance: Leadership, Trust and Social Capital. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2211–2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandford, M. (2015). Parish and Town Councils: Recent Issues, Standard. Note 04827. House of Commons, London.Google Scholar
  32. Simmons, R., & Birchall, J. (2007). Tenant Participation and Social Housing in the UK: Applying a Theoretical Model. Housing Studies, 22(4), 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, I., Lepine, E., & Taylor, M. (Eds.). (2007). Disadvantaged by Where You Live?: Neighbourhood Governance in Contemporary Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Somervile, P. (2011). Multiscalarity and Neighbourhood Governance. Public Policy and Administration, 6(1), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, M. (2003). Neighbourhood Governance: Holy Grail or Poisoned Chalice? Local Economy, 18(3), 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Travers, T. (2015). London’s Boroughs at 50. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Uitermark, J., & Duyvendak, J. (2008). Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighbourhood Governance in The Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 114–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wagenaar, H. (2007). Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation: How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighbourhood Decline. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 17–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker, R. (2000). The Changing Management of Social Housing: The Impact of Externalisation and Managerialisation. Housing Studies, 15(2), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walker, R. (2006). Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson, D., & Game, C. (2011). Local Government in the United Kingdom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood, B. (1976). The Process of Local Government Reform 1966–74. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Copus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Politics and Public PolicyDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations