Advertisement

Artivism and the Spirit of Avant-Garde Art

  • Dagmar Danko
Chapter
Part of the Sociology of the Arts book series (SOA)

Abstract

Artivism is ambiguous: Positioned between art, politics, and protest movements, it is an artistic-political practice giving voice to the opposition to capitalism and consumerism. Some believe Artivism to be the first new art form of the twenty-first century. However, Artivism also has a tradition: Artists have combined art and activism long before artivists became part of (or triggered) the Occupy Movement, or before Pussy Riot became the world-wide face of protest. In the contribution, the author reflects upon Artivism as an artistic practice and as a political practice. In line with the main theme of this book, the author also analyzes its link to the impacts of the global capitalist economy and the so-called market-based turn in society.

Keywords

Artivism Art Activism Politics Protest Sociology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This contribution is a systematization of a series of paper presentations given at the conferences of the European Sociological Association (ESA) Research Network “Sociology of the Arts,” including: “Interaction Art? How ‘acting together’ may have become an art form” (Geneva 2011), “Art interventions between artistic and political practice” (Vienna 2012), “The sociological implications of ‘Art as catalyst’” (Turin 2013), as well as “Artivism – Subversion oder Bestätigung der ‘Kunstautonomie’?” held at the conference of the German Research Network “Soziologie der Künste” in Leipzig in 2013. I am deeply grateful for all the helpful comments I received during these meetings.

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Orig. Ästhetische Theorie (1970). Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ardenne, Paul. 2004. Un art contextuel. Création artistique en milieu urbain, en situation, d’intervention, de participation. Paris: Flammarion. (Orig. pub. 2002).Google Scholar
  3. Baden, Sebastian. 2014. ‘Occupy-Wall Street’, ‘Ocularpation: Wall Street’ und ‘Emergency Room’ – Protest und Guerillakommunikation in der Kunst bei Zefrey Throwell und Thierry Geoffroy. In Kunst und Öffentlichkeit, ed. Dagmar Danko, Olivier Moeschler, and Florian Schumacher, 113–141. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Howard S. 1997. Outsiders. Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press. (Orig. pub. 1963).Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Orig. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme (1999). Trans. Gregory Elliott. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Orig. Esthétique relationnelle (1998). Trans. Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. Dijon: Les presses du réel.Google Scholar
  8. Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Danko, Dagmar. 2011. Zwischen Überhöhung und Kritik. Wie Kulturtheoretiker zeitgenössische Kunst interpretieren. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  10. Debord, Guy. 1994. The Society of the Spectacle. Orig. La société de spectacle (1967). Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  11. Felshin, Nina, ed. 2006. But Is It Art? The Spirit of Art as Activism. Seattle: Bay Press. (Orig. pub. 1995).Google Scholar
  12. Fowkes, Maja, and Reuben Fowkes. 2012. #Occupy Art. Art Monthly, 359, September. http://www.artmonthly.co.uk/magazine/site/article/occupy-art-by-maja-and-reuben-fowkes-september-2012. Accessed 7 Oct 2015.
  13. Groys, Boris. 2014. On Art Activism. e-flux Journal 56: 1–14. http://www.e-flux.com/journal/on-art-activism. Accessed 7 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Orig. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (1981). Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heinich, Nathalie. 2005. L’élite artiste. Excellence et singularité en régime démocratique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  16. Holmes, Brian. 2009. Escape the Overcode. Activist Art in the Control Society. Eindoven. Van Abbemuseum in collaboration with WHW, Zagreb. http://brianholmes.wordpress.com/2009/01/19/book-materials. Accessed 26 June 2014.
  17. ———. 2012. Eventwork. The Fourfold Matrix of Contemporary Social Movements. http://brianholmes.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/eventwork. Accessed 26 June 2014.
  18. Janhsen, Angeli. 2007. Art-Suspect – Kunstverdacht. In Nodes – Knotenpunkte 2007. An Experimental Exhibition with Seven Artists at Seven Venues in NRW, ed. Matthias Weiß, 12–31. Bönen: Kettler.Google Scholar
  19. Lasn, Kalle. 2000. Culture Jam. New York: Harper Collins. (Orig. pub. 1999).Google Scholar
  20. Lemoine, Stéphanie, and Samira Ouardi. 2010. Artivisme. Art, Action Politique et Résistance Culturelle. Paris: Éditions Alternatives.Google Scholar
  21. Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Art as a Social System. Orig. Die Kunst der Gesellschaft (1995). Trans. Eva M. Knodt. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1988. The Differend. Phrases in Dispute. Orig. Le différend (1983). Trans. Georges Van Den Abbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. The Return of the Political. London/New York: Verso. (Orig. pub. 1993).Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2007. Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces. Art & Research 1 (2): 1–5. http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/pdfs/mouffe.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2014.Google Scholar
  25. Prozorov, Sergei. 2014. Pussy Riot and the Politics of Profanation: Parody, Performativity, Veridiction. Political Studies 62 (4): 766–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rancière, Jacques. 2008. Le spectateur émancipé. Paris: La fabrique éditions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richter, Angela. 2014. Die Avantgarde der Nerds. monopol. Magazin für Kunst und Leben 2: 70–73.Google Scholar
  28. Rohr-Bongard, Linde. 2012. Das Comeback der Polit-Kunst. manager magazin, 5 May. http://www.managermagazin.de/magazin/artikel/0,2828,834437,00.html. Accessed 26 June 2014.
  29. Schmitz, Lilo (ed.). 2015. Artivismus. Kunst und Aktion im Alltag der Stadt. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, Nato., ed. 2012. Living as Form. Socially Engaged Art from 1991–2011. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tolokonnikova, Nadezhda, and Slavoj Žižek. 2013. Nadezhda Tolokonnikova of Pussy Riot’s prison letters to Slavoj Žižek. The Guardian. (Orig. pub. Philosophie Magazin, 1, 16–24, December/January 2013/14). http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/nov/15/pussy-riot-nadezhda-tolokonnikova-slavoj-zizek. Accessed 26 June 2014.
  32. Vander Gucht, Daniel. 2004. Art et politique. Pour une redéfinition de l’art engagé. Bruxelles: Éditions Labor.Google Scholar
  33. Voigt, Kirsten Claudia. 2015. Artivismus, Pragmatismus und Narrativierung. Signaturen einer Kunst als sozialer Praktik. Kunstforum International, 231, 56ff, February–March.Google Scholar
  34. Weibel, Peter. 2013. global aCtIVISm. 14.12.2013–30.03.2014. Exhibition at the ZKM Karlsruhe. http://www.global-activism.de/exhibition-ausstellung. Accessed 26 June 2014.
  35. Żmijewski, Artur interviewed by Susanne Boecker. 2012. Kunst ist eine perfekte Camouflage. Kunstforum International, 216, 163–169, July–August.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dagmar Danko
    • 1
  1. 1.European Sociological AssociationParisFrance

Personalised recommendations