Advertisement

Queer Acknowledgments

  • Branden Buehler
  • Roxanne Samer
Chapter
Part of the Queer Studies and Education book series (QSTED)

Abstract

Branden Buehler and Roxanne Samer examine a model of academic kinship that supplants the traditional model rooted in the idea of genealogy, thereby suggesting that to be or think queer in academic spaces requires that we rethink the way that scholars and ideas are related in the academy. Academia, including the system of advisors, dissertation committees, peer groups, and the departments to which we belong, is often conceptualized as a family tree. However, the classic tree metaphor—borrowed from heteronormative forms of kinship structures—might not be the best model for a system that is often more circular than linear, more communal than hierarchical. Buehler and Samer explore how scholars become oriented toward the ideas of others and directed by certain lines of thought. Building on Sara Ahmed’s work on queer phenomenology and Gérard Genette’s theories of paratexts, Buehler and Samer take up acknowledgments sections as archives chronicling their authors’ intellectual influences and look at the kinship structures traceable within, between, and across them. Their theorizing of queer academic genealogies is further informed by their deployment of social network analysis software, which they use to map the web of queer studies’ thank-yous, anecdotes, and in-jokes that can be found within its acknowledgments sections. In doing so, they identify academic relationships and social bonds that normally go unseen. While they focus their study in terms of sample and critical investment, their approach could be extended to demonstrate in a broader fashion the ways in which all intellectual concerns, disciplines, and methodologies take shape over time. Buehler and Samer’s analysis thus offers up a way of mapping structures and systems of knowledge, informed not by trite metaphors, but by the flexibility and dialectics of queer theory.

Works Cited

  1. About The Academic Family Tree. 2017. Academictree. Web. 2 Oct 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press Books. Print.Google Scholar
  3. Burdick, Anne, et al. 2012. Digital_Humanities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Print.Google Scholar
  4. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Print.Google Scholar
  5. Easley, David, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Print.Google Scholar
  6. Freeman, Elizabeth. 2007. Queer Belongings: Kinship Theory and Queer Theory. In A Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies, ed. George E. Haggerty and Molly McGarry, 295–314. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell. Print.Google Scholar
  7. Galloway, Alexander R. 2006. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Print.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2012. The Interface Effect. Cambridge/Malden: Polity. Print.Google Scholar
  9. Genette, Gérard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Trans. Jane E. Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Print.Google Scholar
  10. Hansen, Derek, Ben Shneiderman, and Marc A. Smith. 2010. Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann. Print.Google Scholar
  11. Khabsa, Madian, Sharon Koppman, and C. Lee Giles. 2012. Towards Building and Analyzing a Social Network of Acknowledgments in Scientific and Academic Documents. In Social Computing, Behavioral – Cultural Modeling and Prediction, ed. Shanchieh Jay Yang, Ariel M. Greenberg, and Mica Endsley, 357–364. College Park: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. link.springer.com. Web. 2 Oct 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7227.Google Scholar
  12. Love, Heather. 2009. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Print.Google Scholar
  13. Overview. Eigenfactor.org. Web. 2 Oct 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Branden Buehler
    • 1
  • Roxanne Samer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Communication and MediaSUNY OneontaOneontaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Visual and Media ArtsGrand Valley State UniversityAllendaleUSA

Personalised recommendations