Advertisement

The Evolution of Government–MNC Relations in China: The Case of the Automotive Sector

  • Gregory T. Chin
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

This chapter examines the evolution of government–multinational corporation (MNC) relations in China’s automotive industry from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s, and the ensuing changes in government–MNC relations that emerged henceforth in the automotive sector. The central argument is that, in China, the automotive industry witnessed dramatic changes in the governance pattern of government–MNCs relations that enabled more full use of the capital, technology and know-how of the leading foreign MNCs for the modernization of this sector. In turn, leading foreign automotive MNCs responded to these regulatory changes, and the rapid growth of China’s domestic auto market by making some of the largest ever investments in China. From a comparative perspective, the capital invested, and transfers of technology and know-how by the MNCs to China enabled Chinese domestic automotive corporations to absorb leading-edge global practices and technology more rapidly than in other large developing countries such as India.

Keywords

Government–MNC relations Technology transfer Automobile industry FDI regulation Industrial governance Green finance 

References

  1. Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, M. (2000). Post-Fordism and global restructuring. In R. Stubbs & G. Underhill (Eds.), Political economy and the changing global order (pp. 152–162). Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, H.-J. (1996). The political economy of industrial policy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Chin, G. T. (2010). China’s automotive modernization: The party-state and multinational corporations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faison, S. (1998). GM opens Buick plant in Shanghai. The New York Times, 18, 1.Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher, K. S. (2006). China shifts gears: Oil, pollution and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. He, G. (1993). Mingque mubiao wanshan zhanlue tuijin jixie qiche chanye de zhenxing [Clarify goals, improve strategy, and invigorate the mechanical and automobile industry]. Gongcheng jianshe yu sheji [Project construction and design], 3, 2–5.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Perkowski, J. (2008). Managing the dragon. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  11. Ray, S., & Miglani, S. (2016). Innovation (and Upgrading) in the Automobile Industry: The Case of India. ICRIER Working Paper No.320, May.Google Scholar
  12. Thun, E. (2006). Changing lanes in China: Foreign direct investment, local governments, and auto sector development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in east Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory T. Chin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations