Advertisement

Hosting a Successful Metamodern Party: Mixed Methods Management Research on the Web 2.0+

  • Anna K. Zarkada
  • George G. Panigyrakis
  • Eugenia Tzoumaka
Chapter

Abstract

There is an academic consensus that mixed methods designs can help overcome the inherent limitations of single method protocols because they simultaneously provide data depth and breadth whilst safeguarding generalisability and transferability of results. Still, their use in academic research remains limited due to the high costs involved. In this chapter it is argued that a large part of the resource restrictions can be reduced by using the internet for sampling and data collection.

A study of the consumer-based brand equity of celebrity footballers is presented as an example of an exploratory sequential mixed methods design combining on line sampling, focus group participant recruitment, and quantitative data collection with traditional focus groups.

The chapter provides checklists and practical tips for selecting and designing data collection platforms, managing research ethics and applying research promotion strategies. It demonstrates that online research increases rather than sacrifices data quality and argues for the necessity of combined on and offline mixed methods management research enriched with state-of-the-art technology developed by businesses. Moreover, it offers industry an academically sound testing of their digital marketing practices. Finally, the effect of aligning academic research with the realities of the Web2.0+ lived experience on the academics’ role identity is explored.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research project used as an example here was funded by FIFA under João Havelange Research Scholarship by CIES Research and sponsored by the digital publishing group 24MEDIA. The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical advice provided by Ms Katerina Fotiadi and the helpful comments of Dr Ilias Kapareliotis.

References

  1. Abeza, G., O’Reilly, N., Dottori, M., Séguin, B., & Nzindukiyimana, O. (2015). Mixed Methods Research in Sport Marketing. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 9(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/18340806.2015.1076758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexa. (2016, December 23). Top Sites in Greece November 2016. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/GR
  3. Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Athanasopoulou, P., Zafeiropoulou, G., Siomkos, G. J., Assiouras, I., & Douvis, J. (2011). Consumer Behaviour in the Arena: A Classification of Football Fans. Paper presented at the 4th Annual EuroMed Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business.Google Scholar
  5. Baudrillard, J. (1988). The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures (Société de Consommation: Ses Mythes, Ses Structures) (C. Turner, Trans.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bauer, H. H., Sauer, N. E., & Schmitt, P. (2005). Customer-Based Brand Equity in the Team Sport Industry: Operationalization and Impact on the Economic Success of Sport Teams. European Journal of Marketing, 39(5–6), 496–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Cui, X., Zhou, Q., & Liu, L. (2015). Using Online Field Surveys in e-business Research: Reflections on a Referent Study. International Journal of Electronic Business, 12(4), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeb.2015.074610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahir, A. L. (2016). Smartphone Use Has Doubled in Africa in Two Years. Quartz Africa, (SMART FUTURE). Retrieved from https://qz.com/748354/smartphone-use-has-more-than-doubled-in-africa-in-two-years/
  11. Deutskens, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004). Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study. Marketing Letters, 15(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mark.0000021968.86465.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. eMarketer. (2014). Traditional or Digital Ads? Millennials Show Mixed Feelings. eMarketer.com. Retrieved from eMarketer.com website: https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Traditional-Digital-Ads-Millennials-Show-Mixed-Feelings/1010747#sthash.m3HSKh07.dpuf
  13. European Interactive Advertising Association. (2008). Sport and the Shift to Interactive Media 2008, Pan-European Results. Retrieved from http://www.sponsors.de/uploads/tx_svsstudiengaenge/EIAA_-_Sport_and_the_Shift_to_Interactive_Media_2008.pdf
  14. Fricker, R. D. J. (2008). Sampling Methods for Web and E-mail Surveys. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods (pp. 195–216). London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2007). The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined. Political Analysis, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Google. (2016). Google Trends. Retrieved December 29, 2016, from Google https://www.google.com/trends/
  17. Hancock, L. (2016). B2B Programmatic vs Ad Blockers: Who’s Winning. Perspectives, Marketing and Sales. Retrieved from dun&bradstreet website: http://www.dnb.com/perspectives/marketing-sales/b2b-programmatic-vs-ad-blockers-who-is-winning.html
  18. Hanna, R., Rohm, A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2011). We’re All Connected: The Power of the Social Media Ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison, R. L., III. (2013). Using Mixed Methods Designs in the Journal of Business Research, 1990–2010. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2153–2162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrison, R. L., III, & Reilly, T. M. (2011). Mixed Methods Designs in Marketing Research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 14(1)), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751111099300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2008). Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hewson, C. (2008). Internet-Mediated Research as an Emergent Method and It’s Potential Role in Facilitating Mixed Methods Research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), The Handbook of Emergent Methods (pp. 543–570). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. International Telecommunication Union. (2016a). Fixed Telephone Subscriptions (per 100 People). Retrieved December 21, 2016, from The World Bank Group http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.MLT.MAIN.P2
  24. International Telecommunication Union. (2016b). Individuals Using the Internet. Retrieved December 21, 2016, from The World Bank Group http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.MLT.MAIN.P2
  25. Internet Live Stats. (2014). Internet Users by Country. Retrieved from http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users-by-country/
  26. Internet World Stats. (2016). World Internet Usage and Population Statistics, June 30, 2016—Update. Retrieved December 6, 2016, from Miniwatts Marketing Group http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
  27. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or Entrepreneurs? Investigating Role Identity Modification of University Scientists Involved in Commercialization Activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joseph, M., Mullen, E. W., & Spake, D. (2012). University Branding: Understanding Students’ Choice of an Educational Institution. Journal of Brand Management, 20(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemp, S. (2016). Digital in 2016. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.com/uk/special-reports/digital-in-2016
  31. Kemper, E. A., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed Methods Sampling Strategies in Social Science Research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (pp. 273–296). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Kurzman, C., Anderson, C., Key, C., Lee, Y. O., Moloney, M., Silver, A., & Van Ryn, M. W. (2007). Celebrity Status*. Sociological Theory, 25(4), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00313.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leslie, L. Z. (2011). Celebrity in the 21st Century: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  34. Luck, E. M., & Mathews, S. W. (2010). What Advertisers Need to Know About the iYGeneration: An Australian Perspective. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(1–2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490903574559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lutha, I., & Virtanen, I. (1996). Analyzing the Behaviour of a Non-linear Advertising Campaign Model; an Application of Bifurcation Theory, Lyapunov Exponents and Correlation Dimension. In P. Walden, M. Brannback, B. Back, & H. Vanharanta (Eds.), The Art and Science of Decision-Making (pp. 138–151). Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Manzo, A. N., & Burke, J. M. (2012). Increasing Response Rate in Web-Based/Internet Survey. In L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences (pp. 327–343). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 25(2), 179–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MediaScope Europe. (2012). Greece Launch Presentation Summary. Retrieved from http://www.iab.gr/files/1/research/Mediascope/mediascope_2012_greece_summary%20launch%20presentation.pdf
  39. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murphy, P. (1996). Chaos Theory as a Model for Managing Issues and Crises. Public Relations Review, 22(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(96)90001-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Brien, J. (2012). How Red Bull Takes Content Marketing to the Extreme. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2016/12/22/robotic-mobilization-device/#YRcwESBSraqi
  42. PageFair, & Adobe. (2014). Ad Blocking Goes Mainstream. Retrieved from https://downloads.pagefair.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Adblocking-Goes-Mainstream.pdf
  43. PageFair Team. (2015). The 2015 Ad Blocking Report. PageFair. Retrieved from PageFair website: https://pagefair.com/blog/2015/ad-blocking-report/
  44. Panigyrakis, G., & Zarkada, A. (2014a). New Philosophical Paradigms in Marketing: From Amoral Consumerism to Axiological Societing. In L. Moutinho, E. Bigne, & A. K. Manrai (Eds.), The Routledge Companion on the Future of Marketing (pp. 25–50). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Panigyrakis, G., & Zarkada, A. (2014b). A Philosophical Investigation of the Transition from Integrated Marketing Communications to Metamodern Meaning Cocreation. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 24(3), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2014.911494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parmentier, M.-A., Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. (2012). Positioning Person Brands in Established Organizational Fields. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 373–387. doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0309-2Google Scholar
  47. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Jeong-Yeon, L., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sánchez-Fernández, J., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Montoro-Ríos, F. J. (2012). Improving Retention Rate and Response Quality in Web-Based Surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2013). Increasing Web Survey Response Rates in Innovation Research: An Experimental Study of Static and Dynamic Contact Design Features. Research Policy, 42(1), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schmidt, W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web Survey Research: Benefits, Potential Problems, and Solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(2), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03204826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sedoglavich, V., Akoorie, M. E. M., & Pavlovich, K. (2015). Measuring Absorptive Capacity in High-Tech Companies: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 252–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814523677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharpe, M. (2005). Jacques Lacan (1901–1981). In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.), The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP): A Peer Reviewed Academic Resource. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/lacweb/
  53. Statista. (2016). Mobile Phone Internet User Penetration Worldwide from 2014 to 2019. Retrieved December 28, 2016, from Statista https://www.statista.com/statistics/284202/mobile-phone-internet-user-penetration-worldwide/
  54. Stec, C. (2015). 20 Display Advertising Stats That Demonstrate Digital Advertising’s Evolution. Retrieved from https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/horrifying-display-advertising-stats#sm.000whbz5ucmadwf10k71tymg9oh01
  55. Sternberg, E. (1995). The Economy of Icons. In W. T. Anderson (Ed.), The Truth About the Truth: De-confusing and Re-constructing the Postmodern World (pp. 82–85). New York: Jeremy Tarcher/Putnam.Google Scholar
  56. Teitcher, J. E. F., Bockting, W. O., Bauermeister, J. A., Hoefer, C. J., Miner, M. H., & Klitzman, R. L. (2015). Detecting, Preventing, and Responding to “Fraudsters” in Internet Research: Ethics and Tradeoffs. The Journal of law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tickle, L. (2012). So You Want to Be the New Brian Cox? … How to Become a Celebrity Academic. The Guardian International. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/may/14/celebrity-academic-radio-tv-funding
  58. Tzoumaka, E., & Zarkada, A. (2013, September 25–27). Towards a Model of Consumer Engagement with Celebrity Brands. Paper presented at the 4th EMAC Regional Conference, St. Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
  59. Tzoumaka, E., & Zarkada, A. (2016, June 22–24). ‘He Had a Meaning in My Mind’ Unpacking Celebrity Footballer Brands. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues, Heraklion, Greece.Google Scholar
  60. United States Postal Service. (2006, January 13, 2016). A Decade of Facts and Figures. Retrieved from https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/postal-facts/decade-of-facts-and-figures.htm
  61. Wang, H.-C., & Doong, H.-S. (2010). Nine Issues for Internet-Based Survey Research in Service Industries. The Service Industries Journal, 30(14), 2387–2399. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802644926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zarkada, A., & Polydorou, C. (2013). You Might Be Reputable but Are You ‘Liked’? Orchestrating Corporate Reputation Co-creation on Facebook. In T. Bondarouk & M. R. Olivas-Lujan (Eds.), Advanced Series in Management—Social Media in Strategic Management (Vol. 11, pp. 87–113). London: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zarkada, A., & Tzoumaka, E. (2014, July 15–18). Exploring Soccer Fans’ Schemata Regarding Global VS Local Human Brands. Paper presented at the 2014 Global Marketing Conference Singapore.Google Scholar
  64. Zarkada, A., & Tzoumaka, E. (2015, May 26–29). The Effect of Footballer Brand Characteristics on Fans’ Ticket Purchase Intention. Paper presented at the European Marketing ACademy 2015, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  65. Zarkada, A., Tzoumaka, E., Siomkos, G., & Panigyrakis, G. (2014, December 1–3). Achievement-Based Celebrities as Objects & Instruments of Consumption. Paper presented at the Australia-New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC2014 Agents of Change), Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna K. Zarkada
    • 1
  • George G. Panigyrakis
    • 1
  • Eugenia Tzoumaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationAthens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations