A Study on the Use of Advanced Nondestructive Testing Methods on Histroric Structures

  • Rukiye Tuğla
  • Rüya Kılıç Demircan
  • Gökhan Kaplan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 7)

Abstract

Historic structures are social and cultural heritage for the land they are built on. To protect this heritage and to preserve it for the generations to come are among the most important responsibilities of nations. However numerous historical structures are found in Turkey, the awareness around nondestructive maintenance processes which will keep the identity of the structure intact is not developed as required. Historical structures require preservation, and necessary maintenance and reinforcement measures to be taken in order to survive damages arising from several reasons. Such work must be designed by multidisciplinary professionals and must be applied adhering to the original form of the structure. Among the limiting factors involved in an intervention to a structure is the knowledge on the strength and material properties of the structural elements used. Structural elements of a historical building must be subjected to measurements based on a number of assumptions made for parameters such as compressive strength, shear strength and elasticity modules. As a result of practices based on such assumptions, historical structures may face unnecessary repair and reinforcement processes. With the advancement made in technology now it is possible to obtain the necessary data from historical buildings without causing damage or causing minimal damage using nondestructive or semi-destructive test methods. Therefore, it is important and necessary to use and popularize the use of nondestructive testing methods for historical structures. This study investigates the following nondestructive testing methods and reports on the results obtained in a comparative manner: concrete rebound hammer method; flat-jack method; penetration resistance method; ultrasonic method; impact-echo method; and magnetic and electrical methods.

Keywords

Nondestructive testing methods Historic structures Restoration 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahunbay Z (1996) Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon. YEM yayınları. İstanbul, pp 23–45 (Turkish)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akevren S (2010) Non-destructive examination of stone masonry historic structures–quantitative Ir thermography andultrasonic testing. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, pp 1–148Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aköz F, ve Yüzer N (2001) Tarihi Yapılarda Malzeme Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesinde Uygulanan Yöntemler. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul (Turkish)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Assunçao SS, Gracia VP, Caselles O, Clapes J, Salinas V (2014) Assessment of complex masonry structures with GPR compared to other non-destructive testing studies. Remote Sens 2014(6):8220–8237. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6098220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASTM C 1196–92 (1997) Standard test method for in situ compressive stress within solid unit masonry estimated using Flatjack measurementsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balaras CA, Argiriou AA (2002) Infrared thermography for building diagnostics. Energy Build 34:171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bıanco A (2012) Endoscopic analysis supporting issues of historic stratigraphic investigations: the case history of Saint Domenico Monastery in Naples-Italy. In: 18th World conference on nondestructive testing Durban South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    BS 1881: Part 203 (1986) Recommendations on the non-destructive testing of concrete in the form of plain, reinforced and prestressed test specimens present components and structures by the measurement of ultrasonic pulse velocityGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carino NJ (1991) Nondestructive testing of concrete: history and challenges, concrete technology past, present, and future. In: Proceeding of V. Mohan Malhotra symposiumGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Çavuş M (2011) Tarihi Yapılarda Üst Örtülerin Çelik Malzeme İle Sağlamlaştırılmasının Sonlu Elemanlar Yöntemiyle Modellenmesi. Doktora Tezi Gazi Üniversitesi-Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Ankara (Turkish)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Çiçek P (2009) Thermal performance assessment of historical Turkish Baths. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, pp 1–160Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erköseoğlu G (2012) Kültürel Mirasın Depremden Korunması Ve Turizme Kazandırılması Amacı İle Uygulanabilecek Güçlendirme Teknikleri. Uzmanlık Tezi, T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yatırım ve İşletmeler Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara (Turkish)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gioloti A, Proteco S (2001) Experiences on georadar applicability on masonry structures. RILEM TC 177-MDT workshop on on-site control and non-destructive evaluation of masonry structures, Mantova, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grinzato E, Vavilov V, Kauppinen T (1998) Quantitative infrared thermography in buildings. Energy Build 29:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grinzato E, Bison PG, Marinetti S (2002) Monitoring of the ancient buildings by the thermal method. J Cult Herit 3:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kandemir Yucel A, Tavukcuoglu A, Saltik EN (2007) In situ assessment of structural timber elements of a historic building by infrared thermography and ultrasonic velocity. Infrared Phys Technol 49:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kılıç Demircan R, Kaplan G, Gültekin AB (2016) Analysis of restoration mortars used for strengthening of historical buildings in the context of sustainability criteria. SBE İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koçkar R (2012) Tuğla duvarlardaki ısıl özelliklerin ve ısıl sorunların kızılötesi ısıl görüntüleme ve sıcak kutu yöntemleriyle incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara (Turkish)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuran F, Dabanli Ö (2012) Tarihi Yığma Yapıların Mekanik Özelliklerinin Yerinde Yapılan Flat-Jack (Yassı Kriko) Deneyi İle Belirlenmesi. Restorasyon, pp 180–187Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maıerhofer C, Roellıg M (2009) Active thermography for the characterization of surfaces and interfaces of historic masonry structures. In: NDTCE’09, non-destructive testing in civil engineering, Nantes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maldague XPV (2001) Theory and practice of infrared technology for nondestructive testing. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noland JL, Atkinson RH, Schuller MP (1990) A review of the flat-jack method for nondestructive evaluation. In: Proceedings of the nondestructive evaluation of civil structures and materials, Boulder, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ocana SM, Canas GI, Requena IG (2004) Thermographic survey of two rural buildings in Spain. Energy Build 36:515–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Postacıoğlu B (1981) Cisimlerin Yapısı ve Özellikleri-İç Yapı ve Mekanik Özellikler. Cilt 1, İTÜ Matbaası, İstanbul (Turkish)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qinglin W, Xiuyi W (1988) The evaluation of compressive strength of brick masonry in-situ. In: 8th International brick/block Mas. conference, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sesigür H, Çelik OC, Çılı F (2007) Tarihi yapılarda taşıyıcı bileşenler, hasar biçimleri, onarım ve güçlendirme. İstanbul Bülten 89:10–21Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simões A, Gago A, Lopes M, Bento R (2012) Characterization of old masonry walls: flat-jack method. In: 15 WCEE LisboaGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tavukcuoglu A, Cicek P, Grinzato E (2008) Thermal analysis of an historical Turkish bath by quantitaive IR thermography. Quant Infrared Thermogr J 5(2):151–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tavukçuoğlu A, Akevren S, Grinzato E (2010) In-situ examination of structural cracks at historic masonry structures by quantitative infrared thermography and ultrasonic testing. J Mod Opt 57(18):1779–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Titman DJ (2001) Applications of thermography in non-destructive testing of structures. NDT&E Int 34:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tuğla R, Tavukçuoğlu A, Arslan M (2013) Examination of thermal properties and failures of brick walls by the use of infrared thermography and hot box method. International conference & exhibition on Application of efficient & renewable energy technologies in low cost buildings and construction, Ankara, Turkey, pp 180–199Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yaman İÖ (2010) Betonda Tahribatlı/Tahribatsız Muayene Metodları. Ders Notu Orta Doğu Teknik Universitesi Ankara (Turkish)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rukiye Tuğla
    • 1
  • Rüya Kılıç Demircan
    • 2
  • Gökhan Kaplan
    • 3
  1. 1.Abana Sabahat-Mesut YILMAZ Vocational Schools KastamonuKastamonu UniversityKastamonuTurkey
  2. 2.Civil Engineering DepartmentGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Kastamonu UniversityKastamonuTurkey

Personalised recommendations