Understanding Sustainability Through Mindfulness: A Systematic Review

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 7)

Abstract

The construction industry is central to how the future of humanity will be shaped and can be sustained. Sustainable development and construction is the responsibility not only of researchers, but also all stakeholders involved in the creation and use of the built environment. Despite increasing global awareness on environmental issues, creating a sustainable built environment seems not to be easy. This may be attributed to the gap between the possession of environmental knowledge and environmental awareness, and displaying pro-environmental behavior. It is epitomized by the attitude, “I know I should, but I don’t.”; exemplary, even replacing shorter automobile trips with walking or cycling may cause reduction on environmental impact, driving is the overall tendency of individuals. The characteristic of such an attitude, mindfulness, is ascribed to people who have a relatively greater awareness of the surroundings and of other people. Although mindfulness research has seen exponential growth in the last two decades, a limited number of studies has been adapted towards environmental purposes. This study aims to assess the link between mindfulness and sustainable behavior. In the study, a meta-analytical approach will be adopted, which assumes the conceptualization of mindfulness as a form of behavioral regulation, and the relationship between mindfulness and pro-environmental behavior.

Keywords

Mindfulness sustainability Pro-environmental behavior Meta-analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Chansomsak S, Vale B (2008) Can architecture really educate people for sustainability. World congress SB08, pp. 2262–2269Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnett DL, Browning WD (1995) A primer on sustainable building. ISBN: 1-881071-05-7. Rocky Mountain Institute, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lockton D, Harrison D, Stanton NA (2010) Design for behavior change. Appl Sci Psychol Res 67(69):123–141Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schultz PW, Zelezny LC (2000) Promoting environmentalism. J Soc Issues 56:443–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbaro N, Pickett SM (2016) Mindfully green: examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personal Individ Differ 93:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amel EL, Manning CM, Scott BA (2009) Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: pondering attention and awareness means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology 1:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Turaga RMR, Howarth RB, Borsuk ME (2010) Pro-environmental behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1185:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bodhi B (2000) The connected discourses of the Buddha. ISBN: 978-0-861-71973-0. Wisdom Publications, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kabat-Zinn J (1990) Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your mind to face stress, pain and illness. Dell Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kabat-Zinn J (2005) Coming to our senses: healing ourselves and the world through mindfulness. ISBN: 0-7499-2588-4. Piatkus Books Ltd., UKGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baer RA (2003) Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 10:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown KW, Ryan RM (2003) The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 84:822–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, Carlson L, Anderson ND, Carmody J, Segal ZV, Abbey S, Speca M, Velting D, Devins G (2004) Midfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 11:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moscardo G, Pearce PL (1986) Visitor centres and environmental interpretation: an exploration of the relationship among visitor enjoyment, understanding and mindfulness. J Environ Psychol 6:89–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feldman GC, Hayes AM, Kumar SM, Greeson JM (2004) Development, factor structure and initial validation of the cognitive and Affective mindfulness scale. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buchheld N, Grossman P, Walach H (2001)Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy. The development of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). J Meditation Med Res 1:11–34Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L (2006) Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment 13:27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bergomi C, Tschache W, Kupper Z (2013) The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness 4:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown KW, Ryan RM, Creswell JD (2007) Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychol Inq 18:211–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tapia-Fonllem C, Corral-Verdugo V, Fraijo-Sing B, Duron-Ramos MF (2013) Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: a measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability 5:711–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kurisu K (2015) Pro-environmental behaviors. ISBN: 978-4-431-55832-3. Springer, JapanGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior. Environ Educ Res 8:239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (1978) The new environmental paradigm. J Environ Educ 9:10–19Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thompson SCG, Barton MA (1994) Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J Environ Psychol 14:149–157Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Blaikie NWH (1992) The nature and origins of ecological world views: an Australian study. Soc Sci Quart 73:144–165Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bogner FX, Wiseman M (1999) Toward measuring adolescent environmental perception. European Psychol 4:139–151Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brinkerhoff MB, Jacob JC (1999) Mindfulness and Quasi-religious meaning systems: an empirical exploration within the context of ecological sustainability and deep ecology. J Sci Study Relig 38:524–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jacob JC, Brinkerhoff MB (1997) Values, performance and subjective well-being in the sustainability movement: an elaboration of multiple discrepancies theory. Soc Indic Res 42:171–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jacob JC, Brinkerhoff MB (1999) Mindfulness and subjective well-being in the sustainability movement: a further elaboration of multiple discrepancies theory. Soc Indic Res 46:341–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown KW, Kasser T (2005) Are psychological and ecological well-being campatible? the role of values, mindfulness and lifestyle. Soc Indic Res 74:349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ericson T, Kjonstad BG, Barstad A (2014) Mindfulness and sustainability. Ecol Econ 104:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barber NA, Deale C (2014) Tapping mindfulness to shape hotel guests’ sustainable behavior. Cornell Hosp Q 55:100–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jacob JC, Jovic E, Binkerhoff MB (2009) Personal and planetary well-being: mindfulness mediation, pro-environmental behavior and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Soc Indic Res 93:275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    American Mindfulness Research Association (AMRA) (2016) AMRA database-mindfulness journal publications by year, 1980–2015. https://goamra.org/resources
  37. 37.
    Wu DW-L, DiGiacomo A, Kingstone A (2013) A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: an observational study on food disposa. PLoS ONE 8:1–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArchitectureIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations