Advertisement

Omphalo and Neo-Omphaloplasty

  • Ricardo Baroudi
Chapter

Abstract

Introduction: The umbilical scar is undoubtedly the only scar that is accepted as a natural aspect of the human body. Changes made to its appearance, position, or even the lack of a belly button is seen as a distortion on the beholder, bringing about many repercussions.

Surgical Technique: For more than 50 years, the author has implemented this technique on a countless number of patients.

The release of the umbilical pedicle from the abdominal skin flap has been, to date, performed by making a circular incision, with a skin island of 1 cm diameter and the dissection of the pedicle down to the base. Four cardinal points transfix the edge of the periumbilical skin incision and separate stitches of 5.0 nylon are applied between the cardinal points to better adjust the scarring.

The neo-umbilicoplasty technique is ideal for specific cases of navel necrosis and other problems involving navel morphology and unnatural appearances (e.g., misplacements and/or discomfort of their carriers).

Conclusion: The umbilicus is the most remarkable aspect of the abdomen and this is why an exceptional effort must be made to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result. When performing an umbilicoplasty, we can encounter all kinds of unaesthetic cases and this is why it is necessary to address each one of them with a specific solution.

Keywords

Umbilicoplasty Neo-umbilicoplasty Neo-omphaloplasty Omphaloplasty Abdominoplasty 

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Avelar JM. Abdominoplasty. Systematization of the technique without external umbilical scar. Aesthetic Plastic Surg. 1978;2:141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avelar JM. Umbilicus: its importance and technique making the abdominoplastias (Cicatriz umbilical: da sua importância e da técnica de confecção nas abdominoplastias). Rev Bras Cir Plast. 1979;69:41–52.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vernon S. Umbilical transposition upward and abdominal contouring in lipectomy. Am J Surg. 1957;94:490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baroudi R, Keppke MK, Tozzi Neto FA. Abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;54:161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delerm A. Refinements in abdominoplasty with emphasis on reimplantation of the umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70:362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baroudi R. Umbilicoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1975;2:431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baroudi R, Carvalho CGS. Neoumbilicoplastias: un procedimento en el trasnscorso de las abdominoplastias. Clin Plast Iberolatinoamer. 1981;7:391.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman BS, Weimar BS. Abdominoplasty with special attention to the construction of the umbilicus: technique and complication. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1978;2:65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jamra FA. Reconstruction of the umbilicus by double V-Y procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Juri J, Juri C, Raiden G. Reconstruction of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosique MJF, Rosique RG, Lee FDI, Kawakami H, Glattstein N, Mélega JM. Estudo comparativo entre técnicas de onfaloplastia. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2009;24(1):47–51.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daher JC, Benedik FCADC, Lamartine JD, Amaral G, Rodrigues Neto JN, Cosac OM, Cammarota MC. Umbilicoplastia: experiência com a técnica do minicírculo de pele. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2011;26(2):302–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Baroudi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations