When Love Becomes Self-Abuse: Gendered Perspectives on Unpaid Labor in Academia

  • Francesca Coin
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)


During the 1970s, feminist scholar Silvia Federici maintained that one of the main challenges in the Wages for Housework campaign lay in the fact that women’s domestic labor was presented as an act of love, a natural attribute of the female personality that required no monetary compensation. Today, academic labor is often presented as a labor of love. Especially for young, female academics, scholarly labor is treated as a form of self-expression that fulfills an affective need, hence turning the actual conditions of labor into afterthoughts. In this chapter, I tell the stories of precarious academics in Italy: researchers, postdocs, and adjunct professors who often work long hours in hopes for nebulous rewards such as co-authoring papers, receiving recommendation letters or vague promises of future employment. Drawing on data collected during an online survey administered to 1864 precarious academics and 20 in-depth interviews, I show how adjunct professors and precarious scholars in Italy barely make a living, often live in overcrowded homes and on occasion turn to deviant behavior to make ends meet. Although the mainstream discourse tends to present academic labor as being both elitist and out of touch, the privilege of young scientists that “do what they love”, these interviews often portray academia as a de facto exploitative labor market where young women are expected to provide high-skilled labor for extremely low or no wages. Trapped in the urge to be competitive in the labor market, young women often endure financial hardships and long periods of isolation while they accept the promise of future employment as the affective currency of unpaid work (Bascetta, Economia politica della promessa. Roma: Ilmanifestolibri, 2015). Rather than a labor of love, academic labor sometimes appears as an abusive relationship, an exploitative system chronicled by costly sacrifices and uncertain prospects.


  1. Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bascetta, M. (2015). Economia politica della promessa. Roma: Ilmanifestolibri.Google Scholar
  3. Busso, S., & Rivetti, P. (2014). What’s love got to do with it? Precarious academic labour forces and the role of passion in Italian universities. Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques, 45(2), 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardozo, K. (2016). Academic labor: Who cares? Critical Sociology, 1–24.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (2009). End of millennium (1st ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Descartes, R., Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., & Murdoch, D. (1985). The philosophical writings of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2015). RIO country report Italy 2014. European Commission.Google Scholar
  8. Federici, S. (1975). Wages against housework. London: Power of Women Collective.Google Scholar
  9. Gorz, A. (2003). L’immatériel. Paris: Ed. Galilée.Google Scholar
  10. Guarino, C. and Borden, V. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 1–23.Google Scholar
  11. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2007). Cultural industries. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Hochschild, A. (2012). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Maisto, M. (2009). The adjunct’s moment of truth. Inside Higher Ed. [online]. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from
  14. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse; foundations of the critique of political economy. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Nietzsche, F., Samuel, H., & Kennedy, J. (2016). The genealogy of morals. Floyd, VA: Dancing Unicorn Books.Google Scholar
  16. O’Reilly, J. (2017). [online] Retrieved April 22, 2017, from http://The housewife’s moment of truth.Google Scholar
  17. Pyle, J., & Ward, K. (2003). Recasting our understanding of gender and work during global restructuring. International Sociology, 18(3), 461–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shapin, S. (2012). The Ivory Tower: The history of a figure of speech and its cultural uses. The British Journal for the History of Science, 45(01), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Toepoel, V. (2016). Doing surveys online. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Toscano, E., Coin, F., Giancola, O. et al. (2015). [online]. Retrieved April 22, 2017, from
  22. Weber, M. (1930). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Unwin University Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Coin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Ca’FoscariVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations