Advertisement

AP Research and the Arts: Evaluating a New Approach to College Preparation

  • Ivonne Chand O’Neal
  • Serena Magrogan
  • Lynnette Overby
  • Greg Taylor
Chapter

Abstract

The College Board’s AP Capstone Program (consisting of AP Research and its prerequisite course, AP Seminar) was developed in response to an urgent need identified by the higher education community: students entering colleges and universities were not prepared with research and writing skills to succeed in college. Recognizing the ever-growing centrality of creative problem solving, innovation, and aesthetic discourse in multiple disciplines, this evidence-based program teaches high school juniors and seniors to explore creative and critical avenues of research in the arts among other domains, evaluate source material, synthesize information, undertake a research project with sustained focus over one year, and communicate and defend their work. This chapter describes a multi-method program evaluation, examining data from students, teachers, and school administrators.

Keywords

College readiness College preparation Arts research College Board Academic success 

References

  1. The ACT Profile Report—National. (2006). Retrieved from URL.Google Scholar
  2. Camera, L. (2017). Thriving state economies support robust public education systems. U. S. News and World Report, February 28.Google Scholar
  3. Chand O’Neal, I. (2014). Selected findings from the John F. Kennedy Center’s Arts in Education Research Study: An impact evaluation of arts-integrated instruction through the Changing Education Through the Arts (CETA) program. The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.Google Scholar
  4. Chand O’Neal, I., Paek, S., & Runco, M. A. (2015). Comparison of competing theories about ideation and creativity. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 2(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0018 Google Scholar
  5. Chand O’Neal, I., Schulz Begle, A., Constantinescu, C., & Runco, M. (2015). The art of character: How the arts improve grit, social emotional learning, and creativity. For presentation at the Learning and the Brain Conference: The Science of Character: Using Brain-Psychological Sciences to Promote Self-Regulation, Resilience and Respect, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  6. The College Board. (2008; 2010; 2011; 2012; 2016). AP data – Archived data. Retrieved from https://research.collegeboard.org
  7. Conley, D. (2017). Educational Policy Improvement Center (EPIC). Retrieved from https://www.epiconline.org/
  8. Dougherty, C., Mellor, L., & Jian, S. (2005). The relationship between advanced placement and college graduation. National Center for Educational Accountability.Google Scholar
  9. Hetland, L. (2000). Learning to make music enhances spatial reasoning. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34, 179–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin, A. J., Mansour, M., Anderson, M., Gibson, R., Liem, G. A. D., & Sudmalis, D. (2013). The role of arts participation in students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes: A longitudinal study of school, home, and community factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Trends in academic progress 2012.Google Scholar
  12. Postrel, V. (2003). The substance of style: How the rise of aesthetic value is remaking commerce, culture, and consciousness. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  13. Rauscher, F. H., & Zupan, M. A. (2000). Classroom keyboard instruction improves kindergarten children’s spatial-temporal performance: A field experiment. Early Child Research Quarterly, 15(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(00)00050-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Riley, R. (2016). The global risks report 2016, 11th Edition. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/Media/TheGlobalRisksReport2016.pdf
  15. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2012). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivonne Chand O’Neal
    • 1
  • Serena Magrogan
    • 2
  • Lynnette Overby
    • 3
  • Greg Taylor
    • 4
  1. 1.MUSE Research, LLCKensingtonUSA
  2. 2.The College BoardDuluthUSA
  3. 3.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  4. 4.Purchase College, SUNYPurchaseUSA

Personalised recommendations