Algorithms for Intelligent Automated Evaluation of Relevance of Search Queries Results

  • Anna TikhomirovaEmail author
  • Elena MatrosovaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 636)


This paper is devoted to the problem of automated evaluation of relevance of search queries results. High relevance of search algorithm output is the base of effective large quantities of data processing, which is worked at by users of modern informational systems. Automated and reliable estimate of relevance of search queries results will give the opportunity to lower time expenditures for the best algorithm choice. The usage of improved from this perspective algorithms will allow to raise effectiveness and user satisfaction when dealing with automatic search systems in any activities.


Neural network Semantic analysis Algorithm Search query Teaching model Machine learning 



This work was supported by Competitiveness Growth Program of the Federal Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute).


  1. 1.
    Gabrilovich, E., Markovitch, S.: Feature generation for text categorization using world knowledge. IJCAI 5, 1048–1053 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Samsonovich, A.V.: Functional possible biologically inspired by cognitive architectures. In: XVII All-Russian Scientific-Technical Conference “Neuroinformatics-2015”. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samsonovich, A.V., Klimov, V.V., Rybina, G.V.: Biologically inspired cognitive architectures (BICA) for young scientists. In: Proceedings of the First International Early Research Career Enhancement School (FIERCES 2016) (2016). ISBN: 978-3-319-32553-8 (Print) 978-3-319-32554-5 (Online)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hjorland, B.: The foundation of the concept of relevance. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Skorokhodov, I.S., Tikhomirova, A.N.: Key stages of text processing and feature generation in text classification. Probl. Mod. Sci. Educ. 15(57), 18–22 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balakrishnan, V., Lloyd-Yemoh, E.: Stemming and lemmatization: acomparison of retrieval performances. IACSIT (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balandina, A., Chernyshov, A., Klimov, V., Kostkina, A.: Usage of language particularities for semantic map construction: affixes in Russian language. In: International Symposium on Neural Networks, ISNN 2016, Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN, pp. 731–738 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klimov, V.V., Chernyshov, A.A., Shchukin, B.A.: Composition of web-services based on semantic description. In: WEBIST 2015 – Proceedings 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Altman, J.M., Bland, D.G. Statistics notes: measurement error. BMJ (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tikhomirova, A.N., Sidorenko, E.V.: Optimization of the process of scientific and technical expertise projects in nanobiomedical technologies. Nanotechnics 1(29), 26–28 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kryanev, A.V., Tikhomirova, A.N., Sidorenko, E.V.: Group expertise of innovative projects using the Bayesian approach. Econ. Mathe. Methods 49(2), 134–139 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations