Advertisement

‘This Nothing Held in Common’: Towards a Theory of Activism Beyond the Community of One

  • Barry Watt
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

This chapter attempts a psychoanalytic argument, affirming a version of some of the central tenets of anarchist social and political philosophy. To do so, it opens with a critical appraisal of the contemporary work of political theorists Nick Srnicek, Alex Williams and Jeremy Gilbert. It suggests that, to be adequate to the demands of organising for a post-capitalist world, it is necessary to avoid implicitly positing communities and subjectivities as reified, self-enclosed and self-identical to themselves, or with reference to what is here referred to as the covert but often unrecognised assumption underpinning many social and political philosophies, of a ‘community of one’. It is suggested that, to subvert this supposition, we are obliged to draw out the radical implications for political thought and praxis, of the deep and abiding connection within the Western philosophical tradition, of its reliance upon ontological notions of property and the emergence and dominance of liberal capitalism’s legal and economic categories of rights to and relations between property ownership. Via recourse to the recent work of Italian philosopher Roberto Esposito on the nature of community, the chapter concludes by seeking to uphold political demands for the abolition of private property whilst insisting upon the priority, for activists engaged in anti-capitalist struggle, of pursuing this through the establishment of organisational networks of ‘mutual aid’, formulated as a free exchange of gifts that makes no expectation of a counter-gift or a return in kind.

References

  1. Adorno, T. (1991 [1951]). Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propaganda. In The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. Trans. and Ed. J. Bernstein. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bookchin, M. (2015). The Next Revolution: Popular Assemblies and the Promise of Direct Democracy. London and New York: Vesro.Google Scholar
  3. Borch-Jacobsen, M. (1988). The Freudian Subject. Trans. C. Porter. Stanford: Standford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Derrida, J. (2008). Given Time: Counterfeit Money: Counterfeit Money Vol. VI. Trans. P. Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Esposito, R. (2009). Communitas: The Origin and Destiny of Community. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Esposito, R. (2012). Terms of the Political: Community, Immunity, Biopolitics. Trans. R. N. Noel Welch. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1976). The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality Volume I. Trans. R. Hurley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, J. (1970). The Tyranny of Structurelessness. http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
  9. Freud, S. (1921). Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, in (1955) Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XVII). Ed. and Trans. J. Stratechey. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1930). Civilisation and Its Discontents, in (1961) Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XXI). Ed. and Trans. J. Stratechey. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert, J. (2015). Common Ground: Democracy and Collectivity in an Age of Individualism. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kropotkin, P. (2009 [1902]). Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. Freedom Press: Trans. I. McKay. London.Google Scholar
  13. Lacan, J. (2015). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VIII: Transference (1960–1961). Ed. J.-A. Miller, Trans. B. Fink. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Laclau, E. (1996). Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics? In Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  15. Locke, J. (1980 [1690]). Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Mandelbaum, A. (1993). The Metamorphoses of Ovid. New York: Harcourt Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mauss, M. (2001). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Ancient Societies. Trans. W. D. Halls. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Nunes, R. (2014). Organisation of the Organisationless: Collective Action After Networks. London: Mute.Google Scholar
  19. Schmitt, C. (2007). The Concept of the Political. Trans. T. Strong. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Srnicek, N., & Williams, A. (2015). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Weir, L. (2013). Roberto Esposito’s Political Philosophy of the Gift. Angelaki, 18(3), 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry Watt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations