Narcissism, Melancholia and the Exhaustion of the ‘Journeying’ Subject

  • Anastasios Gaitanidis
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)


In this chapter, I intend to trace the development of Freud’s thought from his introduction of narcissism and the importance he placed on the process and outcome of mourning to his later emphasis on melancholic identification for the construction of the subject. I will suggest that Freud never really abandoned his belief in the significance of mourning as he always prioritised the subject’s identification with the transient power of the rival object (i.e., the father—in the case of the positive Oedipus complex—or mother—in the case of the negative one) over the subject’s identification with the lost object. However, I will also suggest that Freud’s understanding of the nature of melancholic identification is particularly significant as it throws light on the current social conditions that necessitate the construction of either a subject that melancholically (and regressively) longs for a union with what is dead or maniacally defends against it.

If, according to Freud, the outcome of successful mourning is the acceptance of the transience of the object and our attachment to it so as to be able to reignite our desire to invest in new relationships that will produce pleasure, his later insistence on the importance of melancholic identification as fundamental in the construction of the subject indicates not a new ethical relationship to the lost other (as Judith Butler suggests) but a form of stagnation and regression—that is, a subject who is so over-determined by loss and fear that he is unable to move on as he feels trapped within a world (and its corresponding form of subjectivity) that is essentially non-erotic and death-driven. This leads to a form of endless mourning that accentuates the subject’s desire to find permanence in the process of mourning itself as the world constantly threatens his survival and refuses to offer the prospect of anything new that could bring the process of mourning to a spontaneous end. In this respect, I will argue that Butler’s employment of this form of endless mourning as a basis for a new kind of community, a community that does not aspire to create a unifying identity but whose members are aware of their ‘vulnerable’ relational web of their grievable lives, is highly problematic as it seems to validate and hypostatise (instead of criticising) the social conditions that produce this community of ethical ‘losers’.

Yet, the solution is not to simply accept Freud’s earlier account of mourning, which could lead to the nostalgic restitution of the bourgeois monadological subject that stands opposed to the world in his narcissistic enclosure. By using Homer’s Odyssey as the paradigmatic narrative of the modern, ‘journeying’ subject and tracing its changing structure and content in its various contemporary manifestations (James Joyce’s Ulysses and Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis), I suggest that we should attempt to simultaneously preserve and negate this notion of mourning and the monadological subject implied by it—to demonstrate our allegiance to it at the time of its fall. This will also lead us to the configuration of a new type of ‘melancholic’ subjectivity/community—not one that obsessively clings to a nostalgic attempt to resurrect what is lost so as to satisfy his narcissistic ends and preserve his identity, but one that refuses to appropriate all the past losses for his own purposes because he wants to honour their alterity, but is unable to do so because he is currently ‘exhausted’ from his endless travelling and he needs to stop and rest so as to find the necessary time and space to process his failure to reach his ‘final destination’ (and, perhaps, to reconsider the purpose and function of this destination) before he resumes his journey.


  1. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1944). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. J. Cumming. London: Verso, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. W., & Benjamin, W. (1999). The Complete Correspondence 1928–1940. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, J. (2013). Levels of Life (Kindle ed.). London: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (2003). Violence Mourning, Politics. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 4(1), 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Clewell, T. (2004). Mourning Beyond Melancholia: Freud’s Psychoanalysis of Loss. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52(1), 43–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Delillo, D. (2003). Cosmopolis. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1914). On Narcissism: An Introduction. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, (Hereafter SE) (Vol. XIV). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1916). On Transience. SE, XIV.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and Melancholia. SE, XIV.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. SE, XIX.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S., & Breuer, J. (1893–1895). Studies on Hysteria. SE, II.Google Scholar
  14. Gaitanidis, A. (2012). Narcissism, Mourning and the ‘Masculine’ Drive. In A. Gaitanidis (Ed.), The Male in Analysis: Psychoanalytic and Cultural Perspectives (pp. 53–65). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joyce, J. (1922). Ulysses. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Laplanche, J. (1976). Life and Death in Psychoanalysis. Trans. and Intro. J. Mehlman. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Miyasaki, D. (2003). The Evasion of Gender in Freudian Fetishism. Psychoanalysis, Culture, and Society, 8(2), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wallace, D. F. (1999). Some Remarks on Kafka’s Funniness from Which Probably Not Enough Has Been Removed. In D. F. Wallace (Ed.), Consider the Lobster (Kindle ed.). (2006). London: Hachette Digital.Google Scholar
  19. Žižek, S. (2000). Melancholy and the Act. Critical Inquiry, 26(4), 657–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastasios Gaitanidis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations