Advertisement

Characteristics of US Elections in the Digital Media Age

  • Diana Owen
Chapter
Part of the Political Campaigning and Communication book series (PCC)

Abstract

This chapter provides a detailed discussion of the media-related characteristics of American election campaigns. Six major traits of elections in the digital era are identified: (1) technology-driven campaigning, (2) voter digital engagement, (3) hyper-personalized campaigning, (4) expanded campaign professionalization, (5) rampant polling and horserace media coverage, and (6) negativity and incivility. These developments are traced from the early days of the new media era to the present day.

References

  1. Allcott, Hunt, and Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election, Research Paper. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Ashley A., Danielle Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael A. Xenos, and Peter Ladwig. 2014. The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19: 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avirgan, Jody, and Clare Malone. 2016. Why the Dean Scream Sounded So Different on TV. FiveThirtyEight, February 4. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-the-dean-scream-sounded-so-different-on-tv/.
  4. Baines, Paul R. 2005. Marketing the Political Message: American Influences on British Practices. Journal of Political Marketing 4 (2): 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baines, Paul R., Christian Scheucher, and Fritz Plasser. 2001. The “Americanisation” Myth in European Political Markets – A Focus on the United Kingdom. European Journal of Marketing 35 (9/10): 1099–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bimber, Bruce. 2014. Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 11 (2): 130–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bimber, Bruce, and Richard Davis. 2003. Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blumer, Jay G., and Dennis Kavanaugh. 1999. The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication 16 (3): 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brecic, Katarina. 2012. “Americanization” Without Trivialization: Analysis of Newspaper Reporting About Vesna Pusic’s 2009 Presidential Campaign. Društvena istraživanja 21 (2): 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, Meta S. 2016. Big Data Analytics and the Next President: How Microtargeting Drives Today’s Campaigns. Forbes, May 29. https://www.forbes.com/sites/metabrown/2016/05/29/big-data-analytics-and-the-next-president-how-microtargeting-drives-todays-campaigns/#4b1706d86c42.
  11. Campaign Finance Institute. 2016. Presidential Fundraising—An Analysis of the Candidates, Parties, and Joint Fundraising. Press Release, Washington, DC, August 18.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, Richard, and Diana Owen. 1999. New Media and American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Bruce A. Williams. 2001. Let Us Infotain You: Politics in the New Media Age. In Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, ed. W. Lance Bennett and Robert M. Entman, 160–181. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Denton, Robert, Jr., ed. 2014. Studies of Communication in the 2012 Presidential Election. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. Denver, David, and Gordon Hands. 2000. Post-Fordism in the Constituencies? The Continuing Development of Constituency Campaigning in Britain. In Do Political Campaigns Matter? ed. David Farrell and Rudiger Schmitt-Beck. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Doom, Jilanne K. 2016. Decoding the Candidates: A Semiotic Analysis and Literacy Guide to Graphic Design Principles in Political Campaign Branding. Masters Thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. Farrar-Meyers, Victoria A., and Justin S. Vaughn. 2015. Controlling the Message. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foote, Kirsten A., and Steven M. Schneider. 2006. Web Campaigning. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gainous, Jason, and Kevin M. Wagner. 2013. Tweeting to Power. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibson, Rachel, and Marta Cantijoch. 2013. Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline? Journal of Politics 75 (3): 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goidel, Kirby, ed. 2011. Political Polling in the Digital Age. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gowan, Annie, and Rama Lakshmi. 2014. Indian Parties Are Using Obama-Style Campaign Tactics in Crucial Election. The Washington Post, April 14. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/indian-parties-are-using-obama-style-campaign-tactics-in-crucial-election/2014/04/06/db7d4571-8333-4334-b252-3ebd99b25746_story.html?utm_term=.b791348ac6eb.
  23. Grofman, Bernard, Alexander H. Trechsel, and Mark Franklin, eds. 2014. The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective: Voters, Candidates, Parties, and Social Movements. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. vanHeerde-Hudson, Jennifer. 2011. The Americanization of British Party Advertising? Negativity in Party Election Broadcases, 1964–2005. British Politics 6 (1): 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heilemann, John, and Mark Halperin. 2010. Game Change. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  27. Herrman, John. 2016. Inside Facebook’s (Totally Insane, Unintentionally Gigantic, Hyperpartisan) Political-Media Machine. The New York Times Magazine, August 25: 1–14. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/magazine/inside-facebooks-totally-insane-unintentionally-gigantic-hyperpartisan-political-media-machine.html?_r=1.
  28. Hill, Ronald Paul, Michael Capella, and Yoon-Na Cho. 2015. Incivility in Political Advertisements: A Look at the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. International Journal of Advertising 34 (5): 812–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Issenberg, Sasha. 2012a. The American Connection: François Hollande Has Embraced the Tactics of Obama’s 2008 Campaign—and It Might Win Him the French Election. Slate, April 20. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/victory_lab/2012/04/french_elections_fran_ois_hollande_is_using_obama_s_tactics_to_defeat_nicholas_sarkozy_.html.
  30. ———. 2012b. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  31. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2010. Echo Chamber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Johnson, Karen S., and Camille Elebash. 1986. The Contagion from the Right: The Americanization of British Political Advertising. In New Perspectives on Political Advertising, ed. Lynda Lee Kaid, Dan D. Nimmo, and Keith R. Sanders. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kluver, Randolph, Nicholas W. Jankowski, Kirsten A. Foot, and Steven M. Schneider, eds. 2007. The Internet and National Elections: A Comparative Study of Web Campaigning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Lapowsky, Issie. 2016. Here’s How Facebook Actually Won Trump the Presidency. Wired, November 15. https://www.wired.com/2016/11/facebook-won-trump-election-not-just-fake-news/.
  35. Lewandowski, Andrew D. 2013. Obama™: Political Branding and Participation in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. Masters Thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  36. Mancini, Paolo, and David L. Swanson. 1994. Politics, Media and Democracy. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  37. Meunier, Sophie. 2010. Globalization, Americanization and Sarkozy’s France. European Political Science 9 (2): 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mutz, Diana C., and Byron Reeves. 2005. The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Needham, Catherine, and Gareth Smith. 2015. Introduction: Political Branding. Journal of Political Marketing 14: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neely, Alexander. 2016. Donald Trump Social Media Trending Replaces Ad Spending. DMN Webcast, September 20. http://www.dmnews.com/social-media/donald-trump-social-media-trending-replaces-ad-spending/article/523666/
  41. Negrine, Ralph, and Stylianos Papathanassopoulos. 1996. The “Americanization” of Political Communication: A Critique. International Journal of Press/Politics 1 (2): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newman, Bruce L. 1994. A Review in Political Marketing: Lessons from Recent Presidential Elections. Working Paper. Chicago: Yaffe Center, DePaul University. http://yaffecenter.org/downloads/Complete_List_of_Working_Papers/NEWMAN.pdf
  43. Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Owen, Diana. 1991. Media Messages in American Presidential Elections. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2013. The Campaign and the Media. In The American Elections of 2012, ed. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeyer and Steven E. Schier, 21–47. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2014. New Media and Political Campaigns. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication Theories, ed. Kate Kenski, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. New York: Oxford University Press, Chapter 53.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2015. The Political Culture of American Elections. In Electoral Cultures: American Democracy and Choice, Publications of the Bavarian American Academy, ed. Georgiana Banita and Sascha Pohlmann, 205–224. Heidelberg: Universitatsverlag.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2017a. Twitter Rants, Press Bashing, and Fake News: The Shameful Legacy of Media in the 2016 Election. In Trumped: The 2016 Election That Broke All the Rules, ed. Larry J. Sabato, Kyle Kondik, and Geoffrey Skelley, 167–180. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2017b. Tipping the Balance of Power in Elections? Voters’ Engagement in the Digital Campaign. In The Internet and the 2016 Presidential Campaign, ed. Terri Towner and Jody Baumgartner. New York: Lexington Books. (in press).Google Scholar
  50. Patterson, Thomas E. 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2016. News Coverage of the 2016 Primaries: Horserace Reporting Has Consequences, Research Report. Boston: Harvard University, Shorenstein Center on Media and Politics. https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-presidential-primaries/.
  53. Perlmutter, David D., and Guy Golan. 2005. Counter-Imaging: Myth-Making and Americanization in Israeli Labor Party Campaign Ads. Visual Communication 4 (3): 304–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pew Research Center. 2016. The 2016 Presidential Campaign: A News Event That’s Hard to Miss. Research Report. Washington, DC, February 4. http://www.journalism.org/2016/02/04/the-2016-presidential-campaign-a-news-event-thats-hard-to-miss/.
  55. Plouffe, David. 2009. The Audacity to Win. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenblatt, Allen. 2016. What Did Hillary Clinton Leave on the Social Media Table? Huffington Post, December 2. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/what-did-hillary-clinton-leave-on-the-social-media_us_58419d99e4b04587de5de94d.
  57. Sabato, Larry J. 1981. The Rise of Political Consultants. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  58. ———. 1991. Feeding Frenzy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Scammell, Margaret. 2002. The Internet and Civic Engagement: The Age of the Citizen-Consumer. Political Communication 17 (4): 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 2014. Consumer Democracy: The Marketing of Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schipper, Burkhard C., and Hee Yuel Woo. 2016. Political Awareness, Microtargeting of Voters, and Negative Electoral Campaigning, Research Paper. Davis: University of California.Google Scholar
  62. Semiatin, Richard, ed. 2013. Campaigns on the Cutting Edge. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sheingate, Adam. 2016. Building a Business of Politics: The Rise of Political Consulting and the Transformation of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  65. Silver, Nate. 2017. The Real Story of 2016: What Reporters—and Lots of Data Geeks, Too—Missed About the Election, and What They Are Still Getting Wrong. FiveThirtyEight, January 19. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-real-story-of-2016/.
  66. Slaby, Michael. 2013. From Politics to Public Policy—Part 3: How Campaign Lessons Can Amplify Your Work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, April 9: 1–7.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, Aaron. 2014. Cell Phones, Social Media, and Campaign 2014, Research Report. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, November 3. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/03/cell-phones-social-media-and-campaign-2014/.
  68. Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tumulty, Karen. 2017. How Donald Trump Came Up with ‘Make America Great Again’. The Washington Post, January 18. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-donald-trump-came-up-with-make-america-great-again/2017/01/17/fb6acf5e-dbf7-11e6-ad42-f3375f271c9c_story.html?utm_term=.4a0d6819e097.
  70. Vaccari, Cristian, et al. 2015. Political Expression and Action on Social Media: Exploring the Relationship Between Lowerand Higher-Threshold Political Activities Among Twitter Users in Italy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20: 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. West, Darrell M. 2014. Air Wars: Television Advertising and Social Media in Election Campaigns, 1952–2012. 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  72. Winston, Joel. 2016. How the Trump Campaign Built an Identity Database and Used Facebook Ads to Win the Election. Medium, November 18. https://medium.com/startup-grind/how-the-trump-campaign-built-an-identity-database-and-used-facebook-ads-to-win-the-election-4ff7d24269ac#.xpwe08w8b.
  73. Xifra, Jordi. 2011. Americanization, Globalization, or Modernization of Electoral Campaigns? Testing the Situation in Spain. American Behavioral Scientist 55 (6): 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yack, Austin. 2016. Clinton Campaign’s Social Media Strategy Was More Effective Than Trump’s. The National Review, November 8. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/441944/hillary-clintons-effective-use-social-media.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Owen
    • 1
  1. 1.Communication, Culture, and TechnologyGeorgetown UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations