Advertisement

Reframing the Sex Offender Register and Disclosure: From Monitoring and Control to Desistance and Prevention

  • Kieran McCartan
  • Hazel Kemshall
  • James Hoggett
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society book series (PSRCS)

Abstract

Sexual harm is a high-profile issue, both nationally and internationally, with the number of perpetrators entering and being managed by the Criminal Justice System continually increasing. These increases in the sexual offender population are the result of a ‘perfect storm’ of disclosures, reporting, recording, sentencing, and community management. The ever increasing sex offender population places additional pressure on existing risk management services (i.e., Police, Probation, Prison, etc.) already under financial, political, and practical strain. Such strain ultimately means that sex offender risk management becomes about bureaucracy, cost saving, risk aversion, and an audit culture rather than innovation and adaption. This chapter will consider the implications of this growing offender population and its impact on the current risk management system, posing the questions: Are we looking at this from the correct perspective and are we getting the most out of the existing system?

Keywords

Sex offender registration Disclosure Desistance Management 

References

  1. Ackerman, A., Levenson, J., & Harris, A. (2012). How many sex offenders really live among us? Adjusted counts and population rates in five US states. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(3), 464–474. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2012.666407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bichard Inquiry. (2004). The Bichard inquiry report. London: The Stationery Office. Available at: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6394/1/report.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  3. Brierie, D. M. (2014). Are the collateral consequences of being a registered sex offender as bad as we think? A methodological research note. Federal Probation, 78(1), 28–31.Google Scholar
  4. Bierie, D. M. (2015). The utility of sex offender registration: A research note. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 22(2). doi: 10.1080/13552600.2015.1100760.
  5. Bottoms, A. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In C. Clarkson & R. Morgan (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brayford, J., & Deering, J. (2012). Media influences on public perceptions of sex offenders: Impact on policy and practice. In J. Brayford, F. Cowe, & J. Deering (Eds.), Sex offenders: Punish, help, change or control?: Theory, policy and practice explored (pp. 52–68). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J. (2017). Public health, prevention and risk management. In K. McCartan & H. Kemshall (Eds.), Perceptions of sex offender risk management. Palgrave, chapter 2. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant, S., Peck, M., & Lovbakke, J. (2015). Reoffending analysis of MAPPA eligible offenders. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. London: The Stationary Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/407139/reoffending-analysis-of-mappa-eligible-offenders.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  9. Bullock, K., & Tilley, N. (2009). Evidence-based policing and crime reduction. Policing, 3(4), 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. College of Policing. (2016, April 3). Current figures on sex offender registration and CDOSD usage. Private communication.Google Scholar
  11. Crown Prosecution Service. (2016). Violence against women and girls: Crime report 2015–16. Crown Prosecution Service. http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/cps_vawg_report_2016.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2016.
  12. Davidson, J. (2008). Child sexual abuse: Media representations and government reactions. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, D. (2003). ViSOR—Violent and sex offender register. Criminal Justice Matters, 51, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrall, S., & Calverley, A. (2006). Understanding desistance from crime: Theoretical directions in resettlement and rehabilitation. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education, Oxford University Press: Crime and Justice Series.Google Scholar
  15. Fitch, K. (2006). Megan’s law: Does it protect children? (2) An updated review of evidence on the impact of community notification as legislated for by Megan’s law in the United States. London: NSPCC.Google Scholar
  16. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of crime control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Göbbels, S., Ward, T., & Willis, G. (2012). An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 453–462. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guardian Newspaper. (2017). Number of child sexual abuse claims overwhelming police, says lead officer. Theguardian.com. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/feb/28/child-sexual-abuse-claims-overwhelming-police-says-lead-officer. Accessed 8 Mar 2017.
  19. Hansard, HC Deb. (2006, May 10). c25WS. Available at: https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wms/?id=2006-05-10d.25WS.0. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
  20. Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Helmus, L. M., & Thornton, D. (2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2792–2813. Available at: https://floridaactioncommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/HighRiskOffenders_MayNotBeHighForever_Hanson_Harris_Helmus_Thornton.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  21. Harper, C. A., & Bartels, R. M. (2016). Implicit theories and offender representativeness in judgments about sexual crime. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. doi: 10.1177/1079063216658019.
  22. Harper, C. A., Hogue, T. E., & Bartels, R. M. (2017). Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important? Aggression and Violent Behavior. ISSN 1359-1789. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.011.
  23. Harris, D. A. (2014). Tales from the trenches: Zooming in on the process of desistance from sexual offending. In K. McCartan (Ed.), Responding to sexual offending: Perceptions, Risk management and public protection. Palgrave, chapter 9.Google Scholar
  24. Harris, D. A. (2017). Desistance. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, D. A., & Cudmore, R. (2015). Desistance from sexual offending. In Oxford handbook of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 1–15). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, A. J., & Socia, K. M. (2014). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the ‘sex offender’ label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 660–678. doi: 10.1177/1079063214564391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, A. J., Levenson, J. S., Lobanov-Rostovsky, C., & Walfield, S. M. (2016). Law enforcement perspectives on sex offender registration & notification: Effectiveness, challenges, and policy priorities. Criminal Justice Policy Review. Online first.Google Scholar
  28. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation. (2006). An independent review of serious further offence case: Anthony Rice. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/probation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/03/anthonyricereport-rps.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
  29. Home Office. (1997). Sex offenders act 1997. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  30. Home Office. (2007). Review of the protection of children from sex offenders. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  31. Hulley, J. (2017). Desistance from sexual offending and risk management. In H. Kemshall & K. McCartan (Eds.), Contemporary sex offender risk management. Basingstoke: Palgrave, chapter 7.Google Scholar
  32. Jenkins, P. (1998). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kemshall, H. (2003). Understanding risk in criminal justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kemshall, H. (2008). Understanding the community management of high risk offenders. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kemshall, H., & Weaver, B. (2012). The sex offender public disclosure pilots in England and Scotland: Lessons for ‘marketing strategies’ and risk communication with the public. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12, 549–565. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1748895811433190
  36. Kemshall, H., Kelly, G., & Wilkinson, B. (2012). Child sex offender public disclosure scheme: The views of applicants using the English pilot disclosure scheme. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(2), 164–178. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2011.552987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kemshall, H., Wood, J., Westwood, S., Stout, B., Wilkinson, B., Kelly, G., & Mackenzie, G. (2010). Child Sex Offender Review (CSOR): Public disclosure pilots, a process evaluation. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  38. Kitzinger, J. (1999). The ultimate neighbour from hell?Stranger danger and the media representation of paedophilia. In B. Franklin (Ed.), Social policy, the media and misrepresentation (pp. 207–221). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Kleban, H., & Jeglic, E. (2012). Dispelling the myths: Can psychoeducation change public attitudes towards sex offenders? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(2), 178–193. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2011.552795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2010). Desistance from sexual offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2011). Desistance from sexual offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The effect of Megan’s law on sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49–66. doi: 10.1002/bsl.770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levenson, J. S., & D’Amora, D. A. (2007). Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The emperor’s new clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 168–199. doi: 10.1177/0887403406295309.
  44. Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x.Google Scholar
  45. Lieb, R., Kemshall, H., & Thomas, T. (2011, May–Jun). Post-release controls for sex offenders in the US and UK. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34(3), 226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 8.
  46. Lum, C. (2009). Translating police research into practice. Washington, DC: Police Foundation (Ideas in American Policing, Series No. 11).Google Scholar
  47. Maddan, S. (2008). The labelling of sex offenders. The Unintended consequences of the best intentioned public policies. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  48. MAPPA Guidance. (2016). https://mappa.justice.gov.uk/connect.ti/MAPPA/view?objectid=23797349. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
  49. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McAlinden, A. M. (2008). Restorative justice as a response to sexual offending – Addressing the failings of current punitive approaches. Sexual Offender Treatment, 3(1). Available at: http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/1-2008_03.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.
  51. McAlinden, A.-M. (2012). The governance of sexual offending across Europe: Penal policies, political economies and the institutionalization of risk. Punishment and Society, 14(2), 166–192. doi: 10.1177/1462474511435573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCartan, K. (2010). Media constructions and reactions to, paedophilia in modern society. In K. Harrison (Ed.), Managing high-risk sex offenders in the community: Risk management, treatmentand social responsibilities (pp. 249–268). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. McCartan, K. (2013). From a lack of engagement and mistrust to partnership? Public attitudes to the disclosure of sex offender information. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 13, 219–236. Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/22246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCartan, K. F. (2014). Responding to sexual offending: Perceptions, risk management and public protection. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCartan, K. F., & McKenzie, N. (2014). Restorative justice, community action and public protection. In S. Maile & D. Griffiths (Eds.), Public engagement and the role of social science. Bristol: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  56. McCartan, K. F., Kemshall, H., & Tabachnick, J. (2015). The reality of community understandings of sexual violence: Rethinking public, practitioner and policy discourses. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21, 100–116. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2014.945976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McCartan, K. F., Hoggett, J., & O’Sullivan, J. (2016). Police officers attitudes to sex offender registration and disclosure in England. UWE.Google Scholar
  58. McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Webster, S. (2014). Sex offender management and dynamic risk: Pilot evaluation of the active risk management system (ARMS). London: NOMS. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/308159/sex-offender-management-and-dynamic-risk.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.
  59. Mercado, C. C., Alvarez, S., & Levenson, J. S. (2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(2), 188–205. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1079063208317540
  60. National Offender Management Service. (2014). Sex Offender management and dynamic risk: Pilot evaluation of the Active Risk Management System (ARMS). London: Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.Google Scholar
  61. National Police Improvement Agency. (2010). Guidance on protecting the public: Managing sexual offenders and violent offenders, second edition, version 2. London: National Policing Improvements Agency.Google Scholar
  62. O’Sullivan, J., Hoggett, J., Kemshall, H., & McCartan, K. F. (2016). Understandings, implications and alternative approaches to the use of the sex offenders register in the UK. Irish Probation Journal, 13, 84–101.Google Scholar
  63. Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking. (2016). Smart summary: Global survey of sex offender registration and notification systems. Office of sex offender sentencing, monitoring, apprehending, registering, and tracking. https://smart.gov/pdfs/global-survey-2016-final.pdf. Accessed 8 Mar 2017.
  64. Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2015). Protecting children from harm: A critical assessment of child sexual abuse in the family network in England and priorities for action. Retrieved from https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Protecting%20children%20from%20harm%20-%20full%20report.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2017.
  65. Peck, M. (2011). Patterns of reconviction among offenders eligible for Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). London: Ministry of Justice Research Series 6/11. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/217373/patterns-reconviction-mappa.pdf
  66. PPANI. (2016, May 20). Number of sex offenders on the sex offenders register in Northern Ireland. Private communication.Google Scholar
  67. Przybylski, R. (2015). Recidivism of adult sex offenders, sex offender management assessment and planning initiative. Available at: http://www.smart.gov/pdfs/RecidivismofAdultSexualOffenders.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  68. Risk Management Authority. (2016a). Updated standards and guidelines for risk managementpublished. http://www.rmascotland.gov.uk/news-and-information/latest-news/updated-standards-and-guidelines-risk-management-published/. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
  69. Risk Management Authority. (2016b). Risk assessment tools evaluation directory (RATED). http://rated.rmascotland.gov.uk/. Accessed 27 Feb 2017.
  70. Rogers, D. L., & Ferguson, C. J. (2011). Punishment and rehabilitation: Attitudes toward sex offenders versus nonsexual offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(4), 395–414. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2011.570287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schiavone, S. K., & Jeglic, E. L. (2009, December). Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders. InternationalJournal of Offender Therapy and ComparativeCriminology, 53(6), 679–695. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08323454. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
  72. Scottish Government. (2016, May 20). Number of sex offenders on the sex offenders register in Scotland. Private communication.Google Scholar
  73. Sheppard, D. (2015). A discussion about the development and implementation of the Active Risk Management System (ARMS) in the UK. Sajrt blog. http://sajrt.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/a-discussion-about-development-and.html. Accessed 8 Mar 2017.
  74. Sherman, L. W. (1998). Evidence-based policing. Washington, DC: Police Foundation (Ideas in American Policing, Series No. 2).Google Scholar
  75. Sherman, L. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing: Targeting, testing, and tracking. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 42, pp. 377–451). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Sherman, L. W. (2015). A tipping point for “totally evidenced policing” ten ideas for building an evidence-based police agency. International criminal justice review, 25(1), 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Silverman, J., & Wilson, D. (2002). Innocence betrayed: Paedophilia, the media and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  78. Tabachnick, J., McCartan, K. F., & Janson, P. (2016). Changing course: From a victim/offender duality to a public health perspective. In R. Laws & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Treatment of sex offenders: Strengths and weaknesses in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  79. Tabacknick, J., & McCartan, K. F. (2017). Public education and risk management. In K. McCartan & H. Kemshall (Eds.), Perceptions of contemporary sex offender risk. Palgrave, chapter 3.Google Scholar
  80. Telep, C. W., & Lum, C. (2014). The receptivity of officers to empirical research and evidence-based policing: An examination of survey data from three agencies. Police Quarterly, 17(4), 359–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Terry, K. (2015). Sex offender laws in the United States: Smart policy or disproportionate sanctions? International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 39(2), 113–127. doi: 10.1080/01924036.2014.973048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tewksbury, R., & Lees, L. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tewksbury, R., Jennings, W. G., & Zgoba, K. M. (2012). A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior to and following the implementation of SORN. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 308–328. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thomas, T. (2010). Sex offender register, community notification and some reflections on privacy. In K. Harrison (Ed.), Managing high-risk sex offenders in the community (pp. 61–78). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  85. Thomas, T. (2011). The registration and monitoring of sex offenders: A comparative study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. Thomas, T. (2016). Policing sexual offences and sex offenders. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. UNICEF. (2014). Hidden in plain sight. Retrieved from http://files.unicef.org/publications/files/Hidden_in_plain_sight_statistical_analysis_EN_3_Sept_2014.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.
  88. ViSOR National User Group. (2013). ViSOR standards: Version 3.1. ViSOR product management team. http://library.college.police.uk/docs/college-of-policing/VISOR-standards-2013.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2016.
  89. Wall, L. (2012). Child sex offender disclosure scheme: 18 months on. Understanding public perceptions, media framing, and risk policy formation conference, probation HQ, Birmingham. http://www1.uwe.ac.uk/hls/research/sexoffenderpublicdisclosure/outputs.aspx. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.
  90. Weaver, B., & Barry, M. (2014). Risky business? Supporting desistance from sexual offending. In K. McCartan (Ed.), Responding to sexual offending: Perceptions, risk management and public protection. Basingstoke: Palgrave, chapter 8.Google Scholar
  91. Wood, J., & Kemshall, H. (2007). The operation and experience of Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). London: Home Office. http://www.dmu.ac.uk/documents/health-and-life-sciences-documents/research/rdsolr1207.pdf
  92. Wood, J., Sorg, E. T., Groff, E. R., Ratcliffe, J. H., & Taylor, C. J. (2014). Cops as treatment providers: Realities and ironies of police work in a foot patrol experiment. Policing and Society, 24, 362–379. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2013.784292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kieran McCartan
    • 1
  • Hazel Kemshall
    • 2
  • James Hoggett
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the West of EnglandBristolUK
  2. 2.De Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations