Helping the World One ‘Like’ at a Time: The Rise of the Slacktivist

  • Freya Samuelson-Cramp
  • Elvira Bolat
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility book series (PSGLR)


Much like the corporate sector, the charity and non-profit sector has adopted social media as one of their core engagement and fundraising tools. The online community has great power and has worked well for many brands; however, the extent to which this is benefitting the third sector is debatable. Is liking a non-profit organization on Facebook equal to donating money or running a marathon? A consumer’s online interaction with a charity, e.g. liking or sharing social media content and pages, is sometimes referred to as ‘slacktivism’. To date, studies on ‘slacktivist’ behavior in the social media context are limited to few conceptual papers. This study provides empirical insights into motivations and interactions of social media users towards non-profit and charity-related social media campaigns.


Non-profit and charity-related social media campaigns Slacktivism Theory of reasoned actions Big five personality factors Social media engagement 


  1. Alexander, Baine B., Robert L. Rubinstein, Marcene Goodman, and Mark Luborsky. 1991. Generativity in Culture Context: The Self, Death and Immortality as Experienced by Older American Women. Ageing and Society 11: 417–442. Scholar
  2. AMEC. 2016. Integrated Evaluation Framework. London: AMEC. Accessed 2 May 2017.
  3. Andreoni, James, and Ragan Petrie. 2004. Public Goods Experiments Without Confidentiality: A Glimpse into Fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics 88: 1605–1623. Scholar
  4. Beatty, Sharon E., Lynn R. Kahle, and Pamela Homer. 1991. Personal Values and Gift-giving Behaviors: A Study Across Cultures. Journal of Business Research 22: 149–157. Scholar
  5. Bekkers, René, and Pamala Wiepking. 2010. A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms that Drive Charitable Giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.
  6. Bennett, Roger. 2003. Factors Underlying the Inclination to Donate to Particular Types of Charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8: 12–29. Scholar
  7. Bennett, Roger, and Rita Kottasz. 2000. Emergency Fund-raising for Disaster Relief. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 9: 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunel, F.F., and M.R. Nelson. 2000. Explaining Gendered Responses to “Help-self” and “Help-others” Charity ad Appeals: The Mediating Role of World-views. Journal of Advertising 29: 15–28. Scholar
  9. Coombs, Joseph E., Abbie J. Shipp, and Lisa Christensen. 2008. Entrepreneur as Change Agent: Antecedents and Moderators of Individual-level Philanthropic Behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 55–64. Scholar
  10. Corr, Philip J., Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap, Charles R. Seger, and Kei Tsutsui. 2015. An Experiment on Individual ‘Parochial Altruism’ Revealing No Connection Between Individual ‘Altruism’and Individual ‘Parochialism’. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
  11. Correa, Teresa, Amber Willard Hinsley, and Homero Gil De Zuniga. 2010. Who Interacts on the Web?: The Intersection of Users’ Personality and Social Media Use. Computers in Human Behavior 26: 247–253. Scholar
  12. Cotte, June, Robin A. Coulter, and Melissa Moore. 2005. Enhancing or Disrupting Guilt: The Role of Ad Credibility and Perceived Manipulative Intent. Journal of Business Research 58: 361–368. Scholar
  13. Fielding, Kelly S., Rachel McDonald, and Winnifred R. Louis. 2008. Theory of Planned Behaviour, Identity and Intentions to Engage in Environmental Activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 318–326. Scholar
  14. Fisher, Robert J. 1993. Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning. Journal of Consumer Research 20: 303–315. Scholar
  15. Flora, June A., and Edward W. Maibach. 1990. Cognitive Responses to AIDS Information The Effects of Issue Involvement and Message Appeal. Communication Research 17: 759–774. Scholar
  16. Gächter, Simon, and Ernst Fehr. 1999. Collective Action as a Social Exchange. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 39: 341–369. Scholar
  17. Giving, Just. 2015. Slacktivism – Monster or Myth? A Free Report. London: Just Giving.Google Scholar
  18. Gosling, Samuel D., Peter J. Rentfrow, and William B. Swann. 2003. A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37: 504–528. Scholar
  19. Grau, Stacy Landreth, and Judith Anne Garretson Folse. 2007. Cause-related Marketing (CRM): The Influence of Donation Proximity and Message-framing Cues on the Less-involved Consumer. Journal of Advertising 36: 19–33. Scholar
  20. Grummas, Emma. 2015. Likes Don’t Save Lives – Lessons from a Social Media Campaign. The Guardian, 23 September 2015. Accessed 15 Sept 2015.
  21. Guo, Chao, and Gregory D. Saxton. 2013. Tweeting Social Change: How Social Media are Changing Nonprofit Advocacy Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 1–23. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
  22. Jonas, Eva, Jeff Schimel, Jeff Greenberg, and Tom Pyszczynski. 2002. The Scrooge Effect: Evidence that Mortality Salience Increases Prosocial Attitudes and Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 1342–1353. Scholar
  23. Jung, Na Young, Soohyun Kim, and Soyoung Kim. 2014. Influence of Consumer Attitude Toward Online Brand Community on Revisit Intention and Brand Trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21: 581–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khazan, Olga. 2013. UNICEF Tells Slacktivists: Give Money, Not Facebook Likes. The Atlantic, 30 April 2013. Accessed 20 Jan 2014.
  25. Kottasz, Rita. 2004. Differences in the Donor Behavior Characteristics of Young Affluent Males and Females: Empirical Evidence from Britain. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 15: 181–203. Scholar
  26. Kristofferson, Kirk, Katherine White, and John Peloza. 2014. The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action Journal of Consumer Research 40:1149-1166. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
  27. Lawrance, David. 2016. How Charities Can Make Better Use of Social Media. The Guardian, 28 February 2013. Accessed 2 Feb 2016.
  28. Lee, Yu-Hao, and Gary Hsieh. 2013. Does Slacktivism Hurt Activism?: The Effects of Moral Balancing and Consistency in Online Activism. Paper Presented at ACM, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, April 27 – May 2.Google Scholar
  29. Leek, Sheena, and George Christodoulides. 2009. Next-generation Mobile Marketing: How Young Consumers React to Bluetooth-enabled Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 49: 44–53. Scholar
  30. Lovejoy, Kristen, Richard D. Waters, and Gregory D. Saxton. 2012. Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less. Public Relations Review 38: 313–318. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mano, Rita S. 2014. Social Media, Social Causes, Giving Behavior and Money Contributions. Computers in Human Behavior 31: 287–293. Scholar
  32. Maylor, Harvey, and Kate Blackmon. 2005. Researching Business and Management: A Roadmap for Success. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Messing, Solomon, and Sean J. Westwood. 2012. Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media: Endorsements Trump Partisan Source Affiliation When Selecting News Online. Communication Research.
  34. Michikyan, Minas, Kaveri Subrahmanyam, and Jessica Dennis. 2014. Can You Tell Who I Am? Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Online Self-presentation Among Young Adults. Computers in Human Behavior 33: 179–183. Scholar
  35. Pikkarainen, Tero, Kari Pikkarainen, Heikki Karjaluoto, and Seppo Pahnila. 2004. Consumer Acceptance of Online Banking: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Internet Research 14: 224–235. Scholar
  36. Populus. 2016. Public Trust and Confidence in Charities. Charity Commission UK. Accessed 18 Apr 2017.
  37. Reyniers, Diane, and Richa Bhalla. 2013. Reluctant Altruism and Peer Pressure in Charitable Giving. Judgment and Decision Making 8: 7.Google Scholar
  38. Ross, Craig, Emily S. Orr, Mia Sisic, Jaime M. Arseneault, Mary G. Simmering, and R. Robert Orr. 2009. Personality and Motivations Associated with Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior 25: 578–586. Scholar
  39. Rotman, Dana, Sarah Vieweg, Sarita Yardi, Ed Chi, Jenny Preece, Ben Shneiderman, Peter Pirolli, and Tom Glaisyer. 2013. From Slacktivism to Activism: Participatory Culture in the Age of Social Media. Paper Presented at AMC. CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, May 7–12.Google Scholar
  40. Sargeant, Adrian. 1999. Charitable Giving: Towards a Model of Donor Behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management 15: 215–238. Scholar
  41. Sargeant, Adrian, John B. Ford, and Douglas C. West. 2006. Perceptual Determinants of Nonprofit Giving Behavior. Journal of Business Research 59: 155–165. Scholar
  42. Schervish, Paul G., and John J. Havens. 2001. The Mind of the Millionaire: Findings from a National Survey on Wealth with Responsibility. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising 2001: 75–108. Scholar
  43. Seidman, Gwendolyn. 2013. Self-presentation and Belonging on Facebook: How Personality Influences Social Media Use and Motivations. Personality and Individual Differences 54: 402–407. Scholar
  44. Smith, Joanne R., and Andreè McSweeney. 2007. Charitable Giving: The Effectiveness of a Revised Theory of Planned Behaviour Model in Predicting Donating Intentions and Behaviour. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 17: 363–386. Scholar
  45. Stroebe, Wolfgang, and Bruno S. Frey. 1982. Self-interest and Collective Action: The Economics and Psychology of Public Goods. British Journal of Social Psychology 21: 121–137. Scholar
  46. Vesterlund, Lise, Mark Wilhelm, and Huan Xie. 2008. Motives for Charitable Giving. Mimeo: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  47. Vie, Stephanie. 2014. In Defense of “Slacktivism”: The Human Rights Campaign Facebook Logo as Digital Activism. First Monday 19.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Freya Samuelson-Cramp
    • 1
  • Elvira Bolat
    • 2
  1. 1.The GOOD AgencyLondonUK
  2. 2.Bournemouth UniversityPooleUK

Personalised recommendations