Advertisement

Triangular Diplomacy and Europe’s Changing Gas Network: From “Trying-Angles” to Stable Marriage

  • Adam N. Stulberg
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explicates the puzzle of strategic restraint in gas relations during the 2013–2015 Ukrainian crisis. It spells out the logic of structural energy balancing and traces the transformation of cross-border gas ties from three interacting, but asymmetric “point-to-point” relationships to a triangle system embedded within a broader regional gas network in the lead up to the 2013–2015 conflict. The chapter then probes the strategic consequences of this emerging Euro–Eurasian gas network for facilitating more resilient and diversified relationships in and across Europe, while preserving Russia’s lasting prominence as a commercial supplier. The conclusion explores implications for coercive diplomacy, as well as for strengthening US–Euro–Russian energy governance in the transition to a global gas network.

References

  1. Abdelal, R. (2013). The Profit of Power: Commerce and Realpolitik in Eurasia. Review of International Political Economy, 20, 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmaceda, M. M. (2013). The Politics of Energy Dependency: Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania between Domestic Oligarchs and Russian Pressure. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bordoff, J., & Houser, T. (2014). America’s Gas to the Rescue? Impact of US LNG Exports on European Security and Russian Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia/SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy. http://energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/energy/CGEP_American%20Gas%20to%20the%20Rescue%3F.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  4. Carvalho, R., Buzna, L., Bono, F., Masera, M., Arrowsmith, D. K., & Helbing, D. (2014). Resilience of Natural Gas Networks During Conflicts, Crises, and Disruptions. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e90295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castles, S. (2006, May 1). Poles Angry at Pipeline Pact. The Independent.Google Scholar
  6. Chow, E. (2015, September 25). Energy Reform: The Clock Has Struck Midnight. Kyiv Post. http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/edward-chow-energy-reform-the-clock-has-struck-midnight-398688.html. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  7. Coote, B. (2016). Surging Liquified Natural Gas Trade. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/images/publications/Surging_LNG_Trade.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  8. Cullison, A., & Ostroukh, A. (2015, January 14). Russia Plans Deep Budget Cuts as Revenues Drop. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/russia-facing-budget-cuts-on-oil-price-western-sanctions-1421223776. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  9. De Graaff, N. (2011). A Global Energy Network? the Expansion and Integration of Non-triad National Oil Companies. Global Networks, 11, 262–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dicket, R., Hassanzadeh, E., Henderson, J., Honore, A., El-Katiri, L., Pirani, S., Rogers, H., Stern, J., & Yafimava, K. (2014). Reducing European Dependence on Russian Gas: Distinguishing Natural Gas Security from Geopolitics. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/NG-92.pdf. Accessed on 14 Apr 2016.
  11. Dittmer, L. (1981). The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretical Analysis. World Politics, 33, 485–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domm, P. (2015). How Sanctions Are Hurting Russia’s Energy Sector. CNBC.com. http://www.cnbc.com/2015/04/24/how-sanctions-are-hurting-russias-energy-sector.html. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  13. Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egenhofer, C., Genoese, F., & Dimitrova, A. (2014, December 16). Making the Most of Energy Union. CEPS Commentary. https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/Energy%20Union.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  15. Ericson, R. E. (2009). Eurasian Natural Gas Pipelines: The Political Economy of Network Interdependence. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50, 28–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Council. (2015). EU Restrictive Measures in Response to the Crisis in Ukraine. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/ukraine-crisis/. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  17. Evans, P. C., & Farina, M. F. (2014). The Age of Gas & the Power of Networks. GE Report. http://www.ge.com/stories/age-of-gas. Accessed on 14 Apr 2016.
  18. Feklyunina, F. (2012). Russia’s International Images and Its Energy Policy: An Unreliable Supplier? Europe-Asia Studies, 64, 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gazprom Keeps Scoring Goals, Signs Seemingly-dead Asset Swap with BASF. (2015). Natural Gas Europe. 4 September. http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/gazprom-keeps-scoring-goals-signs-seemingly-dead-asset-swap-with-basf-25281. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  20. Goldman, M. I. (2010). Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goldthau, A., & Boersma, T. (2014, September 10). The Ukraine Challenge and Europe’s Energy Needs Collide. The National Interest. http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-ukraine-challenge-europes-energy-needs-collide-11244. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  22. Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2015). Soft Power with a Hard Edge: EU Policy Tools and Energy Security. Review of International Political Economy, 22, 941–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grabar, V. (2015). Ukraine Won’t Buy Russian Gas Until Yearend-Minister. TASS 2015. http://tass.ru/en/economy/838579. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  24. Healy, B., & Stein, A. A. (1973). The Balance of Power in International History: Theory and Reality. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henderson, J. (2015). Russia’s Changing Gas Relationship with Europe. Russian Analytical Digest 163. http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/RAD-163-2-6.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  26. Henderson, J., & Mitrova, T. (2015). The Political and Commercial Dynamics of Russia’s Gas Export Strategy. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/NG-102.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  27. Hogselius, P. (2013). Red Gas: Russia and the Origins of European Energy Dependence (p. 233). New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  28. Joint UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP). (2003). Cross-border Oil and Gas Pipelines: Problems and Prospects. https://www.esmap.org/sites/esmap.org/files/03503.Cross_Border%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20Pipelines_Problems%20and%20Prospects.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2016.
  29. Kardas, S., Loskot-Strachota, A., & Poplowski, K. (2015, September 9). Gas Business as Usual? The New Agreements between Gazprom and EU Energy Companies. OSW Analyses. http://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2015-09-09/gas-business-usual-new-agreements-between-gazprom-and-eu-energy. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  30. Kim, D.-H. (2013). Coercive Assets? Foreign Direct Investment and the Use of Economic Sanctions. International Interactions, 39, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kropatcheva, E. (2015). EC’s Anti-trust Inquiry into Gazprom’s Practices: Its Significance and Meaning for Gazprom’s Role in the EU Market. Russian Analytical Digest, 174. http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securitiesstudies/pdfs/RAD-174.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  32. Leifheit, D. (2015, October 15). Poland’s LNG Terminal Like a ‘Shotgun on the Wall’. Natural Gas Europe. http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/polands-lng-terminal-like-a-shotgun-on-the-wall-25732. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  33. Moaz, Z., Kuperman, R. D., Terris, L., & Talmud, I. (2006). Structural Equivalence and International Conflict: A Social Network Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 664–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ozawa, M. (2014, July). Trust and European-Russian Energy Trade: The Case of Oil and Gas Partnerships and Long-Term Contracts. University of Cambridge EPRG Working Paper Series, no. 1409. http://uaces.org/documents/papers/1201/ozawa.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2016.
  35. Percival, B. R. (2008). The Risk of Energy Securitization on the Eurasian Continent. Clingendael International Energy Program Briefing Paper.Google Scholar
  36. Pirani, S., Stern, J., & Yafimava, K. (2009). The Russo-Ukrainian Gas Dispute of January 2009: A Comprehensive Assessment. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/NG27-TheRussoUkrainianGasDisputeofJanuary2009AComprehensiveAssessment-JonathanSternSimonPiraniKatjaYafimava-2009.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2016.
  37. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). (2017, August 1). Germany Urges EU to Fight Back Against Russia Sanctions Bill. https://www.rferl.org/a/germany-urges-eu-fight-back-against-us-russian-sanctions-bill-brigitte-zypries-economy-minister/28651923.html. Accessed 2 Aug 2017.
  38. Richter, P. M., & Holz, F. (2015). All Quiet on the Eastern Front? Disruption Scenarios of Russian Natural Gas Supply in Europe. Energy Policy, 80, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riley, A. (2015, June 9). Prioritization in EU Energy Policy: Energy Security First, then Energy Union. Atlantic Council/Global Energy Center. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/publications/reports/prioritization-in-eu-energy-policy-energy-security-first-then-energy-union. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  40. Ryumin, A. (2015, October 28). Gazprom Won’t Participate in Tender for Gas Supplies to Ukraine via Western Border. TASS. http://tass.ru/en/economy/832388. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  41. Sechser, T. S. (2010). Golliah’s Curse: Coercive Threats and Asymmetric Power. International Organization, 64, 627–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaffer, B. (2009). Energy Politics (pp. 47–65). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  43. Skalamera, M. (2015). The Ukraine Crisis: The Neglected Gas Factor. Orbis, 59(3), 398–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stern, J. (2006). The Russian-Ukrainian Gas Crisis of January 2006. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp content/uploads/2011/01/Jan2006 RussiaUkraineGasCrisis-JonathanStern.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
  45. Stern, J., & Rogers, H. (2014). The Dynamics of a Liberalised European Gas Market. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. http://www.oxfordenergy.org/2014/12/dynamics-liberalisedeuropean-gas-market-key-determinants-hub-prices-roles-risks-major-players/. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  46. Stevens, P. (2009). Transit Troubles: Pipelines as a Source of Conflict. London: A Chatham House Report.Google Scholar
  47. Stulberg, A. N. (2012). Strategic Bargaining and Pipeline Politics: Confronting the Credible Commitment Problem in Eurasian Energy Transit. Review of International Political Economy, 19, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stulberg, A. N. (2015). Out of Gas: Russia, Ukraine, Europe, and the Changing Geopolitics of Natural Gas. Problems of Post-Communism, 62, 112–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stulberg, A. N. (2017). Natural Gas and the Russia-Ukraine Crisis: Strategic Restraint and the Emerging Europe-Eurasia Gas Network. Energy Research & Social Science, 24, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sytas, A. (2014, November 13). Lithuania to Pay More for Norwegian LNG than Russian Gas. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USL6NOT268X20141113. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  51. TASS. (2015). Russia May Consider Issue of Discount on Gas for Ukraine Later This Year. http://tass.ru/en/economy/836870. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  52. Walker, S. (2015, November 25). Ukraine Closes Its Airspace to Russia as Gas Supply Dispute Erupts. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/25/ukraine-closes-its-airspace-to-russia-in-latest-escalation#img-1. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  53. Westphal, K. (2009). Russian Gas, Ukrainian Pipelines, and European Supply Security. SWP Research Paper. http://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2009_RP11_wep_ks.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  54. Yetiv, S. A. (2010). Crude Awakenings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Zachmann, G. (2014/15). Elements of Europe’s Energy Union. Bruegel Policy Brief. http://zachmann.be/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Elements-of-Europes-Energy-Union.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.
  56. Zachmann, G., & Naumenko, D. (2014). Evaluating the Options to Diversify Gas Supply in Ukraine. Berlin: German Advisory Group/Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam N. Stulberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Sam Nunn School of International AffairsGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations