Advertisement

Democratizing Government: What We Know About E-Government and Civic Engagement

  • Nina David
Chapter

Abstract

Civic engagement is an ideal that is sought after as the fundamental basis of democratic societies. Civic engagement is, however, difficult to attain both from the perspective of citizens’ willingness and ability to participate and government’s ability to generate such engagement. E-government can play a role in enhancing civic engagement by allowing more and better opportunities for the same. In this chapter, I explore the theoretical and empirical literature on civic engagement, e-government, and their interaction. In the process, I identify key debates surrounding civic engagement through e-government, reveal some of the nuances associated with it, and through an operationalization of civic engagement through e-government, highlight the tools and techniques that are used to achieve it.

References

  1. Abramson, J. B., Arterton, F. C., & Orren, G. R. (1988). The electronic commonwealth: The impact of new media technologies on democratic politics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Aladalah, M., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. (2015). Enabling citizen participation in Gov. 2.0: An empowerment perspective. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 13(2), 77–93.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  4. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R., & Leigh, A. (2003). Customer-oriented e-Government: Can we ever get there. Journal of Political Marketing, 2(3/4), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachen, C. R., Raphael, C., Lynn, K. M., McKee, C., & Philippi, J. (2008). Civic engagement, pedagogy, and information technology on web sites for youth. Political Communication, 25(3), 290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, J. M., Kent, E. P., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  8. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caba Pérez, M. C., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & López Hernández, A. M. (2010). Transparency and egovernment in developing countries: The case of Latin-American municipalities. In C. G. Reddick (Ed.), Citizens and e-government: Evaluating policy and management. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (IGI Global).Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, S. (1999). Cutting out the middleman: From virtual representation to direct deliberation. In B. N. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Conroy, M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2004). Informing and interacting: The use of e-Government for citizen participation in planning. Journal of E-Government, 1(3), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. David, N., Justice, J., & McNutt, J. (2015). Smart cities are transparent cities: The role of fiscal transparency in smart city governance. In M. P. Rodríguez Bolívar (Ed.), Transforming city governments for successful smart cities. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Dryzek, J. (1999). Transnational democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(1), 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans-Cowley, J., & Conroy, M. (2004). E-government and planning: Key citizen participation issues and applications. Columbus, OH: John Glenn Institute for Public Service and Public Policy.Google Scholar
  16. Evans-Cowley, J., & Conroy, M. (2006). The growth of e-government in municipal planning. Journal of Urban Technology, 13(1), 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Firmstone, J., & Coleman, S. (2015). Public engagement in local government: The voice and influence of citizens in online communicative spaces. Information, Communication & Society, 18(6), 680–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fung, A., & Warren, M. E. (2011). The participedia project: An introduction. International Public Management Journal, 14(3), 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gearhart, S., & Kang, S. (2010). E-government and civic engagement: How is citizens’ use of city web sites related with civic involvement and political behaviors? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(3).Google Scholar
  21. Greitens, T., & Strachan, J. C. (2011). E-government and citizen engagement: An overview of US states’ government websites. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(1-2), 54–58. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2010.524083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heeks, R. (2005). e-Government as a carrier of context. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Held, D. (1987). Models of democracy. Cambridge: Polity in Association with Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Hiller, J. S., & Bélanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
  25. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Designing, implementing, and evaluating user-centered and citizen-centered e-government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6(2), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, C. (2015). Local civic participation and democratic legitimacy: Evidence from England and Wales. Political Studies, 63(4), 765–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jordan, G., & Maloney, W. A. (1996). How bumble-bees fly: Accounting for public interest participation. Political Studies, 44(4), 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jun, K. N., Wang, F., & Wang, D. (2014). E-Government use and perceived government transparency and service capacity. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(1), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kang, S., & Gearhart, S. (2010). E-government and civic engagement: How is citizens’ use of city web sites related with civic involvement and political behaviors? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(3), 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kennedy, S. (2007). Write the rules and win: Understanding citizen participation game dynamics. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1067–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & O’Neil, B. S. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laris, M. (2009). O brave new world that has such avatars in it! Arlington among governments establishing a virtual presence. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  35. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levi, M., & Sacks, A. (2009). Legitimating beliefs: Sources and indicators. Regulation & Governance, 3(4), 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, M., & Gregor, S. (2011). Outcomes of effective explanations: Empowering citizens through online advice. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Paper read at 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, at Hawaii.Google Scholar
  40. Macintosh, A., & Tambouris, E. (2009). Electronic participation: First international conference, ePart 2009, Linz, Austria, September 1–3, 2009: Proceedings. Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Malina, A. (1999). Perspectives on citizen democratization and alienation in the public sphere. In B. N. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation: A sketch of a theory of political deliberation. Political Theory, 15(3), 338–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Manza, J., & Cook, F. L. (2002). A democratic polity? Three views of policy responsiveness to public opinion in the United States. American Politics Research, 30(6), 630–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McMillan, S. J. (2002). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity: Some cyber-places are more interactive than others. New Media and Society, 4(2), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Montgomery, K. C., Gottlieb-Robles, B., & Larson, G. P. (2004). Youth as E-citizens: Engaging the digital generation. American University, Center for Social Media, and American University, School of Communication. Washington, DC: Center for Social Media.Google Scholar
  46. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Musso, J., Weare, C., & Hale, M. (2000). Designing web technologies for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy? Political Communication, 17(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/105846000198486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nijkamp, P., & Cohen-Blankshtain, G. (2009). The importance of ICT for cities: E-governance and cyber perceptions. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
  49. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. OECD. (2016). Internet use as a percentage of all households 2014 [cited 7/31/2016 2016]. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/ict/internet-access.htm#indicator-chart
  52. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reece, B. (2006). E-government literature review. Journal of E-Government, 3(1), 69–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Richard, E. (1999). Tools of governance. In B. N. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Hernández, M. P. (2013). Determinants of financial transparency in government. International Public Management Journal, 16(4), 557–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences: Integrating Knowledge and Practice to Advance Human Dignity, 21(2-3), 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scott, J. K. (2006). “E” the people: Do US municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S. H. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28(4), 464–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Syed, P., & Whiteley, P. (1997). Political capital formation among British party members. In J. W. van Deth (Ed.), Private groups and public life: Social participation, voluntary associations and political involvement in representative democracies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public participation in public decisions: New skills and strategies for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. U.S. Census Bureau, & File, T. (2013). Computer and Internet use in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  64. UNDESA. (2016). Citizen engagement. United Nations 2015 [cited 7/30/2016 2016]. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/en/eparticipation
  65. Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina David
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations