Aesthetic and Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction

  • Gabriela dos Santos
  • Cicero Urban


There are many gaps concerning satisfaction and quality of life of patients undergoing a breast cancer treatment. Some authors reveal high levels of satisfaction with their outcomes, though the findings are limited by the use of different methodologies and small series. Patients’ satisfaction is the result of the care and attention given as well as some subjective opinions. The development of the oncoplastic surgery is one of the greatest achievements for the treatment of breast cancer, where better aesthetic outcomes, less psychological damages, and better quality of life are expected. By using mammaplasty techniques, large areas can be resected for the treatment of large tumors, preserving the breast and keeping the symmetry with the contralateral breast, therefore achieving satisfactory oncological and aesthetic results. The aim of this chapter is to critically analyze the criteria for aesthetic and quality-of-life evaluation after breast reconstruction.


Mammaplasty Mammoplasty Breast reconstruction Plastic surgery Aesthetic surgery Cosmetic surgery Medical oncology Clinical oncology Mastectomy Mammectomy Breast neoplasm Breast cancer Surgical flaps Pedicled flap Breast implant 


  1. 1.
    Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M (2007) Systematic review of studies of patients’ satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast 16(6):547–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2003) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2003) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC, Mazzarol G, Maisonneuve P, Garusi C, Intra M, Yamaguchi S, Kaur N, De Lorenzi F, Matthes AG, Zurrida S, Petit JY (2007) Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast 16(4):387–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pezner RD, Patterson MP, Hill LR et al (1985) Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11(3):575–578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Limbergen E, Rijnders A, Van der Schueren E, Lerut T, Christiaens R (1989) Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 2. A quantitative analysis of the influence of radiation dose, fractionation schedules and surgical treatment techniques on cosmetic results. Radiother Oncol 16(4):253–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vrieling C, Collette L, Bartelink E et al (1999) Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost versus no boost’ trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45(3):667–676PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haloua MH, Krekel NM, Jacobs GJ, Zonderhuis B, Bouman MB, Buncamper ME, Niessen FB, Winters HA, Terwee C, Meijer S, van den Tol MP (2014) Cosmetic outcome assessment following breast-conserving therapy: a comparison between BCCT.Core software and panel evaluation. Int J Breast Cancer 2014:716860PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harris JR, Levene MB, Svensson G, Hellman S (1979) Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5:257–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Amaral N, Azevedo I, Barreau L, Bernardo M, Christie D, Costa S, Fitzal F, Fougo JL, Johansen J, Macmillan D, Mano MP, Regolo L, Rosa J, Teixeira L, Vrieling C (2007) Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast 16(5):456–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fitzal F, Krois W, Trischler H, Wutzel L, Riedl O, Kühbelböck U, Wintersteiner B, Cardoso MJ, Dubsky P, Gnant M, Jakesz R, Wild T (2007) The use of a breast symmetry index for objective evaluation of breast cosmesis. Breast 16(4):429–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cardoso JS, Cardoso MJ (2007) Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Artif Intell Med 40(2):115–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Wild T, Krois W, Fitzal F (2009) Comparing two objective methods for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116(1):149–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heil J, Carolus A, Dahlkamp J, Golatta M, Domschke C, Schuetz F, Blumenstein M, Rauch G, Sohn C (2012) Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation. Breast 21(1):61–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heil J, Holl S, Golatta M, Rauch G, Rom J, Marme F et al (2010) Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast 19:470–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stanton AL, Krishnan L, Collins CA (2001) Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 91:2273–2281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Urban C (2016) Aesthetics or symmetry: What’s the aim of breast reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg 139(3):793–794Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Santos G, Urban C, Edelweiss MI, Zucca-Matthes G, de Oliveira VM, Arana GH, Iera M, Rietjens M, de Lima RS, Spautz C, Kuroda F, Anselmi K, Capp E (2015) Long-term comparison of aesthetical outcomes after oncoplastic surgery and lumpectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22(8):2500–2508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuroda F, Urban C, Zucca-Matthes G, de Oliveira VM, Arana GH, Iera M, Rietjens M, Santos G, Spagnol C, de Lima RS (2016) Evaluation of aesthetic and quality-of-life results after immediate breast reconstruction with definitive form-stable anatomical implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):278–286Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garbay JR, Rietjens M, Petit JY (1992) Esthetic results of breast reconstruction after amputation for cancer. 323 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 21(4):405–412Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Calabrese C et al (2001) Immediate reconstruction with mammaplasty in conservative breast cancer treatment: long-term cosmetic results. Osp Ital Chir Rome 7(1–2):38–46Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pusic A, Chen C, Cano S et al (2007) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:823–837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, Klassen A, Cano SJ, Browne J, Pusic AL (2016) The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(2):149–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Conde DM et al (2005) Quality of life in Brazilian breast cancer survivors age 45–65 years: associated factors. Breast J 11(6):125–132Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Casso D, Buist D, Taplin S (2008) Quality of life of 5–10 years breast cancer survivors diagnosed between age 40 and 49. Eur J Oncol Nurs 12:53–57Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sheppard LA, Ely S (2008) Breast cancer and sexuality. Breast J 14(2):176–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hormes JM, Lytle LA, Gross CR, Ahmed RL, Troxel AB, Schmitz KH (2008) The body image and relationships scale: development and validation of a measure of body image in female breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 26(8):1269–1274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Beckjord E, Campas BE (2007) Sexual quality of life in women 19 with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 25(2):19–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Broeckel JA, Thors CL, Jacobsen PB, Small M, Cox CE (2002) Sexual functioning in long-term breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75(3):241–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spagnola S, Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Hooker C, Cohen G, Baker F (2003) The satisfaction with life domains scale for breast cancer (SLDS-BC). Breast J 9(6):463–471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE et al (2004) Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(5):376–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W et al (1999) Brazilian–Portuguese version of the SF-36. A reliable and valid quality of life outcome measure. Rev Bras Reumatol 39:143–150Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    WHOQOL Group (1998) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 46:1569–1585Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sprangers MA, Groenvold M, Arraras JI, Franklin J, te Velde A, Muller M et al (1996) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol 14(10):2756–2768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    He ZY, Tong Q, Wu SG, Li FY, Lin HX, Guan XX (2011) A comparison of quality of life of early breast cancer patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation in China. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(2):545–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hilditch JR, Lewis J, Peter A, van Maris B, Ross A, Franssen E et al (1996) A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Maturitas 24(3):161–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hauser GA, Huber IC, Keller PJ, Lauritzen C, Schneider HP (1994) Evaluation of climacteric symptoms (menopause rating scale). Zentralbl Gynakol 116(1):16–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hunter M (1992) The Women’s Health Questionnaire: a measure of mid-aged women’s perceptions of their emotional and physical health. Psychol Health 7(1):45–54Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maratia S, Cedillo S, Rejas J (2016) Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments using the EMPRO tool. Qual Life Res 25(10):2467–2480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Power M, Harper A, Bullinger M (1999) The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychol 18:495–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherboune CD (1992) 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Den Oudsten BL, Van Heck GL, Van der Steeg AF, Roukema JA, De Vries J (2009) The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 62(2):195–205Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, Bartelink H (1998) Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast- conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801. Eur J Cancer 34(3):307–314 37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dini GM et al (2004) Translation into Portuguese, cultural adaptation and validation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Rev Soc Bras Cir Plast 19(47–52):38Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Veiga DF, Veiga-Filho J, Ribeiro LM, Archangelo I Jr, Balbino PF, Caetano LV, Novo NF, Ferreira LM (2010) Quality-of-life and self-esteem outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(3):811–817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van Der Steeg AF, De Vries J, Roukema JA (2008) The value of quality of life and health status measurements in the evaluation of the well-being of breast cancer survivors. Eur J Surg Oncol 34(11):1225–1230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Freitas-Silva R, Conde DM, de Freitas-Júnior R, Martinez EZ (2010) Comparison of quality of life, satisfaction with surgery and shoulder-arm morbidity in breast cancer survivors submitted to breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 65(8):781–787Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela dos Santos
    • 1
  • Cicero Urban
    • 2
  1. 1.Breast SurgeryUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Breast UnitOur Lady of Grace Hospital and Positivo University Medical SchoolCuritibaBrazil

Personalised recommendations