Advertisement

Implant Rupture

  • Cicero Urban
  • Mauricio Resende
  • Fabio Postiglione Mansani
  • Mario Rietjens
Chapter

Abstract

Although rupture is one of the main causes of implant removal, its real rate is difficult to quantify, especially in breast reconstruction. Most of the ruptures have no obvious traumatic origin and are silent or intracapsular, thus asymptomatic, and with a difficult diagnosis with conventional exams (mammogram and ultrasound). Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate method for implant failure diagnosis, but long-term cohort studies are necessary to evaluate integrity rates of these devices to better support their indications, follow-up, and limits in breast reconstruction. The aim of this chapter was to address the incidence, evaluation, and management of implant rupture in breast reconstruction.

Keywords

Breast implants Internal breast prostheses Breast reconstruction Mammaplasty Mammoplasty Breast neoplasm Breast tumor Silicone gels 

References

  1. 1.
    Shestak KC (ed) (2006) Reoperative plastic surgery of the breast. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lotan AM, Retchkiman M, Tuchman I et al (2016) Analysis of 109 consecutive explanted breast implants: correlation between suspected implant rupture and surgical findings. Aesthet Plast Surg 40:739–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Handel N, Garcia ME, Wixtrom R (2013) Breast implant rupture: causes, incidence, clinical impact, and management. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1128–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rella L, Telegrafo M, Nardone A et al (2015) MRI evaluation of post-mastectomy irradiated breast implants: prevalence and analysis of complications. Clin Radiol 70:948–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hölmich LR, Vejborg IM, Conrad C et al (2004) Untreated silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(1):204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Juanpere S, Perez E, Huc O et al (2011) Imaging breast implants—a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2(6):653–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hernandes MJG, Milena GL, Carazo ER (2016) Subacute silicone pneumonitis after silent rupture of breast implant. Arch Bronconeumol 52(7):397–398Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oh JH, Song SY, Lew DH et al (2016) Distant migration of multiple siliconomas in lower extremities following breast implant rupture: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4:e1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee BT, Duggan MM, Keenan MT et al (2011) Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Registration in medicine expert panel on immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer: executive summary, June 2011. J Am Coll Surg 213(6):800–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA (2005) Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:768–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heneghan C (2012) The saga of Poly Implant Prosthèse breast implants. BMJ 344:e306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nathan B, Meleagros L, Mashhadi S et al (2015) The breast implant rupture warranty: what is it really worth? Aesthet Plast Surg 39:826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hedén P, Nava MB, van Tetering JPB et al (2006) Prevalence of rupture in Inamed silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haws MJ, Alizadeh K, Kaufaman DL (2015) Sientra primary and revision augmentation rupture trending and analysis with magnetic resonance imaging. Aesthet Surg J 35(S1):S33–S42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hölmich LR, Friis S, Fryzek JP et al (2003) Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture. Arch Surg 138:801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Murphy DK, Walker PS (2007) The safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants. Ann Plast Surg 59:569–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Puskas JE, Luebbers MT (2012) Breast implants: the good, the bad and the ugly. Can nanotechnology improve implants? WIREs Nanomed Natobiotechnol 4:153–168.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marotta JS, Goldberg EP, Habal MB et al (2002) Silicone gel breast implant failure: evaluation of properties of shells and gels for explanted prostheses and meta-analyses of literature rupture data. Ann Plast Surg 49:227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Slavin SA, Goldwyn RM (1995) Silicone gel implant explantation: reasons, results and admonitions. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henriksen TF, Frysek JP, Hölmich LB et al (2005) Reconstructive breast implantation after mastectomy for breast cancer. Arch Surg 140:1152–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rochira D, Cavalcanti P, Ottaviani A et al (2016) Longitudinal ultrasound study of breast implant rupture over a six-year interval. Ann Plast Surg 76(2):150–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Venta LA, Salomon CG, Flisak ME, Venta ER, Izquierdo R, Angelats J (1996) Sonographic signs of breast implant rupture. Am J Roentgeno 166:1413–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Monticciolo DL, Nelson RC, Dixon WT, Bostwick III, Mukudan S, Hester TR (1994) MR detection of leakage from silicone breast implants: value of a silicone-selective pulse sequence. AJR 163:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gorczyca DP, Gorczyca SM, Gorczyca KL (2007) The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:49S–61SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seiler SJ, Sharma PB, Hayes JC et al (2017) Multimodality imagingbased evaluation of singlelumen silicone breast implants for rupture. Radiographics 37(2):366–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rietjens M, Villa G, Toesca A et al (2014) Appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to detect early silicone gel breast implant rupture in postmastectomy reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:13e–20eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nahabedian MY (2014) Discussion: appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to detect early silicone gel breast implant rupture in postmastectomy reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:21e–23eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glazebrook KN, Leng S, Jacobson SR et al (2016) Dual-energy CT for evaluation of intra- and extracapsular silicone implant rupture. Case Rep Radiol 2016:6323709 4 pagesPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cicero Urban
    • 1
  • Mauricio Resende
    • 2
  • Fabio Postiglione Mansani
    • 3
  • Mario Rietjens
    • 4
  1. 1.Breast UnitOur Lady of Grace Hospital and Positivo University Medical SchoolCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of MastologyFederal University of SergipeAracajuBrazil
  3. 3.Medicine, Breast and Gynecology UnitState University of Ponta GrossaPonta GrossaBrazil
  4. 4.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations