Advertisement

One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with Definitive Form-Stable Implants

  • Cicero Urban
  • Mario Rietjens
  • Flavia Kuroda
  • Marylin Sanford
Chapter

Abstract

Immediate breast reconstruction with anatomic form-stable implants, associated with skin and nipple-sparing mastectomies, represented one of the greatest advances in oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery. It has a low level of complications and decreases both the time spent in reconstructive surgeries and the number of surgeries for most patients. Surgical revisions of the reconstruction are still needed in some cases and are one of the biggest limitations. However, these are surgical procedures that present minor risks, and many of the procedures can be performed under local anesthesia. Currently, this is our most commonly used technique due to its practicality, low level of long-term complications, and satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.

Keywords

Oncoplastic surgery Breast reconstruction Breast surgery Breast cancer Breast implant 

Supplementary material

Video 37.1

(MOV 1870896 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M et al (1981) Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 305(1):6–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sarrazin D, Le M, Rouëssé J, Contesso G, Petit JY, Lacour J et al (1984) Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in breast cancer tumors with microscopic diameter of 20 mm or less the experience of the institut gustave-roussy. Cancer 53(5):1209–1213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lacour J, Le M, Caceres E, Koszarowski T, Veronesi U, Hill C (1983) Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection. Ten-year results of an international cooperative trial in breast cancer. Cancer 51(10):1941–1943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Susarla SM, Ganske I, Helliwell L, Morris D, Eriksson E, Chun YS (2015) Comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in immediate single-stage versus two stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(1):1e–8ePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warren AG, Morris DJ, Houlihan MJ, Slavin SA (2008) Breast reconstruction in a changing breast cancer treatment paradigm. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1116–1126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roostaeian J, Pavone L, Da Lio A, Lipa J, Festekjian J, Crisera C (2011) Immediate placement of implants in breast reconstruction: patient selection and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(4):1407–1416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodwin SJ, McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Bui D, Howard M, Disa JJ et al (2005) Complications in smokers after postmastectomy tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 55(1):16–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sbitany H, Wang F, Peled AW, Lentz R, Alvarado M, Ewing CA, Esserman LJ, Fowble B, Foster R (2014) Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following total skin-sparing mastectomy: defining the risk of preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for surgical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(3):396–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Disa JJ, McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Hu QY, Cordeiro PG (2009) Postmastectomy reconstruction: an approach to patient selection. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):43–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee BT, Duggan MM, Keenan MT et al (2011) Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine Expert Panel on immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer: executive summary, June 2011. J Am Coll Surg 213(6):800–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Little JW, Golembe EV, Fisher JB (1981) The “living bra” in immediate and delayed reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy for malignant and nonmalignant disease. Plast Reconstr Surg 68(3):392–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rietjens M, Garusi C, Lanfrey E, Petit JY (1997) Cutaneous suspension: immediate breast reconstruction with abdominal cutaneous advancement using a non-resorptive mesh. Preliminary results and report of 28 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 42(2):177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Venturino M, Petit JY (2005) The suspension technique to avoid the use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):467–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jansen LA, Macadam SA (2011) The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part I. A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2232–2244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gamboa-Bobadilla GM (2006) Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 56(1):22–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Breuing KH, Colwell AS (2007) Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 59(3):250–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Breuing KH, Warren SM (2005) Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral alloderm slings. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):232–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Urban CA, Faccenda P, Veloso MLCP, Araújo Filho A, Mendes E, Lima RS (2016) The use of bovine pericardium in immediate breast reconstruction with definitive form-stable implant in a previously irradiated patient (paper in Portoguese). Rev Bras Mastologia 26(2):69–72Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hsieh F, Shah A, Malata CM (2010) Experience with the Mentor Contour Profile Becker-35 expandable implant in reconstructive breast surgery. J Plast Reconstr Surg 64(3):1124–1130Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farace F, Faenza M, Sanna M, Campus GV, Rubino C (2012) Filling-port complications in Becker expanders. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):386e–387ePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, Jones GR, Culbertson JH, Schoemann M (2002) Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(1):89–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammoplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(2):93–100Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sampaio Goes JC (1991) Periareolar mammoplasty. Double skin technique. Breast Dis 4:111–127Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction. Quality Medical Publishing, Inc., St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20:78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ribeiro L (1975) A new technique for reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 12:110Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robbins TH (1977) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:64–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thorek M (1931) Histological verification of efficacy of free transplantation of the nipple. Med J Rec 134:474Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tebbetts JB (2002) A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396–1409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Petit JY, Rietjens M (1991) Deformities following tumorectomy and partial mastectomy. In: Noone B (ed) Plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. BC Decker Inc, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Petit JY, Rietjens M, Contesso G, Bertin F, Gilles R (1997) Contralateral mastoplasty for breast reconstruction: a good opportunity for glandular exploration and occult carcinoma diagnosis. Ann Surg Oncol 4(6):511–515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rietjens M, Petit JY, Contesso G, Bertin F, Gilles R (1997) The role of reduction mammaplasty in oncology. Eur J Plast Surg 20:246–250Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN (2003) Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(2):467–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saha D, Davilla AA, Ver Halen JP, Jain UK, Hanse N, Bethke K et al (2013) Post-mastectomy reconstruction: a risk-stratified comparative analysis of outcomes. Breast 22(6):1072–1080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Washer LL, Gutowski K (2012) Breast implant infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am 26(1):111–125Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D (2005) Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis 5(2):94–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rey P, Martinelli G, Petit JY, Youssef O, De Lorenzi F, Rietjens M et al (2005) Immediate breast reconstruction and high-dose chemotherapy. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):250–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spear SL, Howard MA, Boehmler JH, Ducic I, Low M, Abbruzzesse MR (2004) The infected or exposed breast implant: management and treatment strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(6):1634–1644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sinha I, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG, Hamill JB, Chen X, Kim HM et al (2017) Late surgical -site infection in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(1):20–28PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yii NW, Khoo CT (2003) Salvage of infected expander prostheses in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(3):1087–1092PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Urban C (2017) Aesthetics or symmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:793e–794ePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kuroda F, Urban C, Zucca-Matthes G, de Oliveira VM, Arana GH, Iera M, Rietjens M et al (2016) Evaluation of aesthetic and quality of life results after immediate breast reconstruction with definitive form-stable anatomical implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):278e–286ePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cicero Urban
    • 1
  • Mario Rietjens
    • 2
  • Flavia Kuroda
    • 1
  • Marylin Sanford
    • 3
  1. 1.Breast UnitOur Lady of Grace Hospital and Positivo University Medical SchoolCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
  3. 3.Alaska Breast Care and SurgeryAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations