Advertisement

Oncoplastic Surgery: Central Quadrant Techniques

  • Kristine E. Calhoun
  • Benjamin O. AndersonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Breast-conserving therapy offers both effective treatment and the psychological benefit of retention of the breast. For breast conservation to be effective, the primary tumor must be resected with adequate surgical margins while simultaneously maintaining the breast’s shape and appearance. Declivity of the skin and/or displacement of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) can occur when the target lesion is sizable and can create especially troubling defects for centrally located lesions. Some type of central closure of the breast is commonly required when larger areas of breast tissue are removed. The use of “volume-displacement” techniques for advancing fibroglandular tissue sections along the chest wall to close large resection cavities has become a fundamental tool for cosmetically optimized breast conservation surgery. The techniques described in this chapter include those used for central segmental resections that utilize volume-displacement techniques in which local parenchymal tissue flaps are advanced for glandular remodeling and include the central lumpectomy, batwing mastopexy lumpectomy, donut mastopexy lumpectomy, and variations on the reduction mastopexy lumpectomy which utilize a pedicle flap to restore the nipple-areolar complex.

Supplementary material

Video 26.1

(MOV 2134500 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ (2005) Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol 6:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Audretsch WP (2006) Reconstruction of the partial mastectomy defect: classification and method. In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principle and art, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 179–216Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maguire PD, Adams A, Nichols MA (2015) Oncoplastic surgery and radiation therapy for breast conservation: early outcomes. Am J Clin Oncol 38:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen CY, Calhoun KE, Masetti R, Anderson BO (2006) Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: a renaissance of anatomically-based surgical technique. Minerva Chir 61:421–434PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Love SM, Barsky SH (2004) Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited. Cancer 101:1947–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rezai M, Knispel S, Kellersmann S et al (2015) Systematization of oncoplastic surgery: selection of surgical techniques and patient-reported outcome in a cohort of 1,035 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3730–3737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Santos G, Urban C, Edelweiss MI et al (2015) Long-term comparison of aesthetical outcomes after oncoplastic surgery and lumpectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2500–2508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nizet JL, Maweja S, Lakosi F et al (2015) Oncological and surgical outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery. Acta Chir Belg 115:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vos EL, Koning AH, Obdeijn IM et al (2015) Preoperative prediction of cosmetic results in breast conserving surgery. J Surg Oncol 111:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silverstein MJ, Savalia N, Khan S, Ryan J (2015) Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy. Breast J 21:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grubnik A, Benn C, Edwards G (2013) Therapeutic mammaplasty for breast cancer: oncological and aesthetic outcomes. World J Surg 37:72–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Valenzuela M, Julian TB (2007) Ductal carcinoma in situ: biology, diagnosis, and new therapies. Clin Breast Cancer 7:676–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boetes C, Veltman J, van Die L et al (2004) The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 86:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Recht A et al (2005) Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 201:586–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Rosser RJ et al (1987) Hooked-wire-directed breast biopsy and overpenetrated mammography. Cancer 59:715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liberman L, Kaplan J, Van Zee KJ et al (2001) Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. Am J Roentgenol 177:565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC et al (2010) Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg 199:522–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V et al (2016) A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of a nonradioactive surgical guidance Technology for the Location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol 23:3168–3174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huemer GM, Schrenk P, Moser F et al (2007) Oncoplastic techniques allow breast-conserving treatment in centrally located breast cancers. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:390–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grisotti A (1998) Conservation treatment of breast cancer: reconstructive problems. In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, PA, pp 137–153Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schoeller T, Huemer GM (2006) Immediate reconstruction of the nipple/areola complex in oncoplastic surgery after central quadrantectomy. Ann Plast Surg 57:611–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Iwuagwu OC (2005) Additional considerations in the application of oncoplastic approaches. Lancet Oncol 6:356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meretoja TJ, Svarvar C, Jahkola TA (2010) Outcome of oncoplastic breast surgery in 90 prospective patients. Am J Surg 200:224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roughton MC, Shenaq D, Jaskowiak N et al (2012) Optimizing delivery of breast conservation therapy: a multidisciplinary approach to oncoplastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 69:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kronowitz SJ, Feledy JA, Hunt KK et al (2006) Determining the optimal approach to breast reconstruction after partial mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1–11; discussion 12–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE et al (2014) Society of Surgical Oncology—American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:1507–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ et al (2016) Society of Surgical Oncology—American Society for Radiation Oncology—American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 34(33):4040–4046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Clough KB, Gouveia PF, Benyahi D et al (2015) Positive margins after oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:4247–4253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silverstein MJ, Larson L, Soni R et al (2002) Breast biopsy and oncoplastic surgery for the patient with ductal carcinoma in situ: surgical, pathologic, and radiologic issues. In: Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 185–204Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bong J, Parker J, Clapper R, Dooley W (2010) Clinical series of oncoplastic mastopexy to optimize cosmesis of large-volume resections for breast conservation. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3247–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Caruso F, Catanuto G, De Meo L et al (2008) Outcomes of bilateral mammoplasty for early stage breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:1143–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC et al (2007) Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast 16:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW (2014) A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg 72:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations