Advertisement

Preoperative Planning for Oncoplastic Surgery

  • Cicero Urban
  • Mario Rietjens
  • Mahmoud El-Tamer
Chapter

Abstract

Oncoplastic surgery (OP) represents such an evolution in breast cancer treatment. It allows better aesthetic-functional outcomes, broadening indications for breast-conserving treatment. Preoperative planning is the most important time in this kind of surgery. It implies in two fundamental aims: organization of surgical steps to follow in the theater and to reduce surgical risks. In OP planning is essential to anticipate the size and location of future glandular and skin defects and nipple and areola relations to them. Symmetry is the aim in breast reconstruction, and with a good preoperative planning, it is possible to achieve better oncological and reconstructive outcomes. Then, in this chapter OP planning for all techniques was discussed.

Keywords

Oncoplastic surgery Breast reconstruction Breast surgery Breast cancer Breast-conserving treatment Lumpectomy 

Supplementary material

Video 22.1

(M4V 209978 kb)

Video 22.2

(M4V 131069 kb)

Video 22.3

(M4V 165453 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Clough KB, Kroll SS, Audretsch W (1999) An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(2):409–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baildam AD (2002) Oncoplastic surgery of the breast. Br J Surg 89(5):532–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC (2003) Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg 237(1):26–34PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Mosseri V (1998) Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Surg Oncol 41(5):471–481Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sacchini V, Luini A, Tana S, Lozza L, Galimberti V, Merson M et al (1991) Quantitative and qualitative cosmetic evaluation after conservative treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 27(11):1395–1400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW, Stewart J, Morgan AA (1999) The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. Eur J Surg Oncol 25(6):566–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW (1999) Cosmetic assessment of breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Breast 8(4):162–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olivotto IA, Rose MA, Osteen RT, Love S, Cady B, Silver B et al (1989) Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17(4):747–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bulstrode NW, Shrotria S (2001) Prediction of cosmetic outcome following conservative breast surgery using breast volume measurements. Breast 10:124–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berrino P, Campora E, Santi P (1987) Post quadrantectomy breast deformities: classification and techniques of surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 79(4):567–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petit JY, Garusi C, Greuse M, Rietjens M, Youssef O, Luini A et al (2002) One hundred and eleven cases of breast conservation treatment with simultaneous reconstruction at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan). Tumori 88(1):41–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rietjens M, Petit JY, Contesso G, Bertin F, Gilles R (1997) The role of reduction mammaplasty in oncology. Eur J Plast Surg 20(5):245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith ML, Evans GR, Gurlek A, Bouvet M, Singletary SE, Ames FC et al (1998) Reduction mammaplasty: its role in breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Plast Surg 41(3):234–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Losken A, Elwood ET, Styblo TM, Bostwick J 3rd (2002) The role of reduction mammaplasty in reconstructing partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(3):968–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Wolfe AJ, Tsangaris TN, Pennanen MF (2003) Experience with reduction mammaplasty combined with breast conservation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(3):1102–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stolier A, Allen R, Linhares L (2003) Breast conservation therapy with concomitant breast reduction in large-breasted women. Breast J 9(4):269–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spear SL, Burke JB, Forman D, Zuurbier RA, Berg CD (1998) Experience with reduction mammaplasty following breast conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(6):1913–1916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1227–1232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaur N, Petit JY, Rietjens M, Maffini F, Luini A, Gatti G et al (2005) Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12(7):539–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rietjens M, Urban CA, Petit JY et al (2007) Long term oncologic results of breast conservation treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast 16:387–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Urban C, Lima R, Schunemann E, Spautz C, Rabinovich I, Anselmi K (2011) Oncoplastic principles in breast conserving surgery. Breast 20(Suppl 3):S92–S95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Zanini V, Callegari M, Veronesi P, Catania S et al (1993) Central small size breast cancer: how to overcome the problem of nipple and areola involvement. Eur J Cancer 29A(8):1093–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Góes JC (2003) Periareolar mastopexy: double skin technique with mesh support. Aesthet Surg J 23(2):129–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(2):93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pitanguy I (1967) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20(1):78–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lejour M (1999) Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(3):764–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M (2002) Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(3):960–970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robbins TH (1977) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59(1):64–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cicero Urban
    • 1
  • Mario Rietjens
    • 2
  • Mahmoud El-Tamer
    • 3
  1. 1.Breast UnitOur Lady of Grace Hospital and Positivo University Medical SchoolCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryEuropean Instituteof OncologyMilanItaly
  3. 3.Breast Service, Department of SurgeryMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations