Advertisement

Aesthetic Principles for Breast Reconstruction: Breast Aesthetic Units and Evaluation of Late Aesthetic Results

  • Marcelo M. C. Sampaio
  • Murillo Fraga
Chapter

Abstract

Aesthetics (aisthésis) is a branch of philosophy dealing with the study of nature and beauty. Several philosophers have encountered great difficulty when attempting to define beauty, or even ugliness, and even more when attempting to quantify this property. Kant, a respected philosopher whose aesthetic notions were quoted by his peers, asserted that it was impossible to establish theoretical rules to build beautiful things.

References

  1. 1.
    Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pussic AL (2012) The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):293–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Howes BH, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR (2016) Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg S1748–6815(16):30120–30126Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, Papsdorf M, Lennox PA, Hazen A, MAtros E, Disa J, Mehara B, Pusic AL (2016) Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(3):758–771PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:455–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hudson DA (2004) Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52(1):15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burget GG, Menick FJ (1985) Subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:239–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spear SL (2009) Oncoplastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(3):993–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joyce CW, Murphy S, Kelly JL, Morrison CM (2015) Scar wars: preferences in breast surgery. Arch Plast Surg 42(5):596–600PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Restifo RJ (1999) The aesthetic subunit principle in late TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 43(3):235–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coutinho M, Southern S, Ramakrishnan V et al (2001) The aesthetic implications of scar position in breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 54(5):326–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Song AY, Fernstrom MH, Scott JA, Ren DX, Rubin JP, Shestak KC (2006) Assessment of TRAM aesthetics: the importance of subunit integration. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(1):15–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Falanga V, Zitelli J, Eaglestein W (1998) Wound healing. J Am Acad Dermatol 19(3):559–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spear SL, Davison SP (2003) Aesthetic subunits of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(2):440–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenqvist S, Sandelin K, Wickman M (1996) Patients psychological and cosmetic experience after immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 22:262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, Li LD, Bagher S, Zhong T, Virani S, Narod S, Pal T (2015) Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3324–3330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilkins E, Cederna P, Lowery J et al (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(5):1014–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sabino J, Lucas DJ, Shriver CD, Vertrees AE, Valerio IL, Singh DP (2016) NSQIP analysis: increased immediate reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Am Surg 82(6):540–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC (2002) Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(7):2265–2274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelo M. C. Sampaio
    • 1
  • Murillo Fraga
    • 1
  1. 1.Hospital Sírio Libanês, Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations