Advertisement

Writing the History of the South China Sea Disputes

  • Bill Hayton
Chapter
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)

Abstract

There has been a rapid expansion of published writing on the South China Sea disputes in recent years but relatively little exploration of the disputes’ historic roots. Most of the accounts rely on a relatively small number of works published in the 1970s and 1980s. These reflect the state of knowledge about the issues at those times. The consequence is that contemporary debates about the disputes are being framed by the parameters set 40 years ago. Yet, a careful survey of those early works reveals a lack of primary source material and historical context.

Bibliography

  1. Wai-Chiao P’ing-Lun/Wai Jiao Ping Lun [The Foreign Affairs Review] (Shanghai), October 1933, 2, no. 10 ed.Google Scholar
  2. Wai-Chiao Yüeh-Pao/Wai Jiao Yue Bao [Diplomacy Monthly] (Peiping), September 15, 1933, 3, no. 3 ed.Google Scholar
  3. Wai-Chiao-Pu Kung-Pao/Wai Jiao Bu Gong Bao [Gazette of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs], (Nanking), Autumn 1933, 6, no. 3 ed.Google Scholar
  4. Fan-Chih Yüeh-K’an/Fan Zhi Yue Kan [Geography Monthly] (Nanking), April 1, 1934, 7, no. 4 ed.Google Scholar
  5. Ta Kung Pao/Dagong Bao [The Impartial] (Tianjin), February 1, 1947.Google Scholar
  6. Chung-Yang Jih-Pao/ Zhong yang ri bao [The Central Daily News] (Taipei), June 11, 1956.Google Scholar
  7. Ming-Pao Yueh-K’an [Ming-Pao Monthly] (Hong Kong), May 1974, 101st ed.Google Scholar
  8. “Aircraft Action Report no. 92.” Digital Image. US Navy Patrol Bombing Squadron 117 (VPB–117). U.S. National Archives and Records Administration via Fold3. http://www.fold3.com/image/#302109453.
  9. Annalen der Hydrographie und Maritimen Meteorologie [Annals of Hydrography and Maritime Meteorology]. Berlin: Deutsche Seewarte, E.S. Mittler und Sohn, 1889.Google Scholar
  10. Austin, Greg. China’s Ocean Frontier: International Law, Military Force, and National Development. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. Blussé, Léonard. “Chinese Century. The Eighteenth Century in the China Sea Region.” Archipel 58, no. 3 (1999): 107–29.Google Scholar
  12. Bonnet, François-Xavier. Geopolitics of Scarborough Shoal, Discussion Paper #14. Bangkok: Institut de recherche sur l'Asie du Sud-Est contemporaine (IRASEC) 2012Google Scholar
  13. Bonnet, François-Xavier. Archeology And Patriotism: Long Term Chinese Strategies In The South China Sea. Paper Presented at the Southeast Asia Sea Conference, Ateneo Law Center, Makati, March 27 2015. Available at http://www.imoa.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ARCHEOLOGY-AND-PATRIOTISM.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2017.
  14. Carter, Kit C., and Robert Mueller. U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II: Combat Chronology, 1941–1945. Washington, DC: Center for Air Force History, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. Chang, Teh-Kuang. “China’s Claim of Sovereignty over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A Historical and Legal Perspective.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 23, no. 3 (1991): 399–420.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, Keqin, ed. Zhong Guo Nan Hai Zhu Do [China’s Southern Sea Islands]. Haikou: Hainan International Press and Publication Center, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, Huan. “A Matter of Legality.” Far Eastern Economic Review, February 25, 1974, 25–8.Google Scholar
  18. Cheng, Tao. “The Dispute Over the South China Sea Islands.” Texas International Law Journal 10 (1975): 265–77.Google Scholar
  19. Cheng, Tzu-yüeh. Nan-Hai Chu-Tao Ti-Li Chih-Lūeh/Nanhai Zhudao Dili Zhilue [General Records on the Geography of Southern Islands]. Shanghai: Shang-Wu Ying-Shu-Kuan, 1948.Google Scholar
  20. “China and Her Islands—Keeping an Eye on Foreign Nations.” The Examiner (Launceston, Tasmania), June 12, 1909.Google Scholar
  21. “Chinese Foreign Relations.” The Times, (London), January 18, 1908.Google Scholar
  22. Chiu, Hungdah, and Choon-Ho Park. “Legal Status of the Paracel and Spratly Islands.” Ocean Development & International Law 3, no. 1 (1975): 1–28. doi: 10.1080/00908327509545556.
  23. Cho, Min. “The Triangular Relationship Among China, France and Japan and the Question of Nine Islands in South Sea.” Wai-Chiao Yüeh-Pao/Wai Jiao Yue Bao [Diplomacy Monthly] 3, no. 3 (September 15, 1933).Google Scholar
  24. Chung, Chris P.C. “Since Time Immemorial”: China’s Historical Claim in the South China Sea. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary, 2013. http://theses.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/11023/955/6/ucalgary_2013_chung_chris.pdf.
  25. Copper, John F. “China’s Claim to South China Sea Islands.” China Report 10, no. 3 (May & June, 1974): 10–6. doi: 10.1177/000944557401000302.
  26. Duanmu, Zheng, ed. Guoji Fa (International Law). Beijing: Peking University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  27. Feuer, A. B. Australian Commandos: Their Secret War Against the Japanese in World War II. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 2006.Google Scholar
  28. Freeman, Charles. “Diplomacy on the Rocks.” Address, Seminar of the Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, April 10, 2015. http://chasfreeman.net/diplomacy-on-the-rocks-china-and-other-claimants-in-the-south-china-sea/. Accessed January 25, 2017.
  29. Frodsham, J. D. The first Chinese Embassy to the West; The Journals of Kuo-Sung-Tʻao, Liu Hsi-Hung and Chang Te-yi. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  30. Granados, Ulises. “As China Meets the Southern Sea Frontier: Ocean Identity in the Making, 1902–1937.” Pacific Affairs 78, no. 3 (Fall 2005): 443–61. doi: 10.5509/2005783443.
  31. Granados, Ulises. “Chinese Ocean Policies Towards the South China Sea in a Transitional Period, 1946–1952.” The China Review 6, no. 1 (Spring 2006): 153–181Google Scholar
  32. Hancox, David, and Victor Prescott. “A Geographical Description of the Spratly Islands and an Account of Hydrographic Surveys Amongst Those Islands.” International Boundaries Research Unit, Maritime Briefing 1, no. 6 (1995).Google Scholar
  33. Hara, Kimie. Cold War Frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: Divided Territories in the San Francisco System. London: Routledge, 2006. pp 146–8.Google Scholar
  34. Hayton, Bill. The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  35. Hayton, Bill China’s ‘Historic Rights’ in the South China Sea: Made in America? TheDiplomat.com, 21 June 2016, http://thediplomat.com/2016/06/chinas-historic-rights-in-the-south-china-sea-made-in-america/.
  36. Heinzig, Dieter. Disputed Islands in the South China Sea: Paracels, Spratlys, Pratas, Macclesfield Bank. Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde, 1976.Google Scholar
  37. Heng, Derek. “Trans-Regionalism and Economic Co-dependency in the South China Sea: The Case of China and the Malay Region (Tenth to Fourteenth Centuries AD).” The International History Review 35, no. 3 (2013): 486–510.Google Scholar
  38. Hong Kong Daily Press. “Japan and the Island of Pratas” (7 December 1907), p. 2.Google Scholar
  39. “Hu, Fa-jen Mou-Tuo Hsi-Sha Ch’ün-Tao [The French Plot to Snatch the Paracel Islands].” Wai Chiao P’ing Lun/Wai Jiao Ping Lun (Foreign Affairs Review) 4 (April 1934).Google Scholar
  40. Kuo Wen Chou Pao/Guo Wen Zhou Bao [National News Weekly] 10, no. 33 (1933).Google Scholar
  41. Li, Dexia, and Keng Tat Tan. South China Sea Disputes: China Has Evidence of Historical Claims. August 15, 2014. RSIS Commentary 165, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar
  42. Li Dexia and Tan Keng Tat, South China Sea Disputes: China Has Evidence of Historical Claims. RSIS Commentary 165 dated 15 August 2014. Available at http://www.rsis.edu.sg/wpcontent/uploads/2014/08/CO14165.pdf.
  43. Li, Dexia. Xisha (Paracel) Islands: Why China’s Sovereignty is ‘Indisputable’. June 20, 2014. RSIS Commentary 116, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar
  44. Lin, Jinzhi. “Xisha and Nanshas Have Been Chinese Territory Since Ancient Times.” People’s Daily (Beijing), April 7, 1980.Google Scholar
  45. Lo, Chi-kin. China’s Policy Towards Territorial Disputes: The Case of the South China Sea Islands. London and New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
  46. Lu, Hsi-sha. “A Brief Note on the Paracel Islands.” Hsin-ya-hsi-ya Yüeh-k’an/Xin Ya Xiya Yue Kan [New Asia Monthly] 9, no. 6 (1935): 50–4.Google Scholar
  47. Mackerras, Colin. The New Cambridge Handbook of Contemporary China. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  48. Manguin, Pierre-Yves. “The Southeast Asian Ship: An Historical Approach.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 11, no. 02 (1980): 266–76.Google Scholar
  49. McDevitt, Michael. Foreword. In China Versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea, by Raul Pedrozo. Arlington, VA: Center for Naval Analyses, 2014.Google Scholar
  50. “Memorandum on Four Large Archipelagoes.” (Taipei), February 25, 1974.Google Scholar
  51. Muller, David G. China as a Maritime Power. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  52. Murphy, Brian K. “Dangerous Ground: the Spratly Islands and International Law.” Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 1, no. 2 (1994): 187–212. http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/oclj/vol1/iss2/3.
  53. ‘Nansha Qundao’ [南沙群島, or the Spratly Archipelago], file series 019.3/0012, file 031. August 24, 1946a. ROC Ministry of Foreign Affairs official telegram, The Historical Archives of the Department of Modern History in the Academia Sinica, Taipei.Google Scholar
  54. ‘Nansha Qundao’ [南沙群島, or the Spratly Archipelago], file series 019.3/0012, file 145–146. 1946b. ROC Ministry of Foreign Affairs official telegram, The Historical Archives of the Department of Modern History in the Academia Sinica, Taipei.Google Scholar
  55. Nan Hai Zhu Dao Di Ming Zi Liao Hui Bian [Compilation of References of the Names of All the South Sea Islands]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Map Publishing Company, 1987. Committee of Place Names of the Guangdong ProvinceGoogle Scholar
  56. “On Li Chun’s Patrol of the Sea.” Kuo-Wen Chou-Pao/Guo Wen Zhou Bao [National News Weekly], August 21, 1933, 10, no. 33 ed.Google Scholar
  57. Pedrozo, Raul. China Versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea. Arlington: Center for Naval Analyses, 2014. http://www.cna.org/sites/default/files/research/IOP-2014-U-008433.pdf. Accessed January 30, 2017.
  58. PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs, comp. “China’s Indisputable Sovereignty Over the Xisha and Nansha Islands.” Beijing Review 23, No. 4 (February 18, 1980): 15–24.Google Scholar
  59. Ptak, Roderich. “The Northern Trade Route to the Spice Islands: South China Sea—Sulu Zone—North Moluccas (14th to Early 16th Century).” Archipel 43, no. 1 (1992): 27–56.Google Scholar
  60. Saix, Olivier. “Iles Paracels.” In Wai Chiao P’ing Lun/Wai Jiao Ping Lun [Foreign Affairs Review], translated by Huan-Yung Hu. Vol. 5. Shanghai, 1934. First published in La Geographie (bulletin de la Société de Géographie, Paris, France), Nov. & Dec. 1933.Google Scholar
  61. Samuels, Marwyn S. Contest for the South China Sea. New York: Methuen, 1982.Google Scholar
  62. Schottenhammer, Angela. “The “China Seas” in World History: A General Outline of the Role of Chinese and East Asian Maritime Space from Its Origins to c. 1800.” Journal of Marine and Island Cultures 1, no. 2 (2012): 63–86.Google Scholar
  63. Shao, Hsun-cheng. “Chinese Islands in the South China Sea.” People’s China (Peking), 1956, 13th ed.Google Scholar
  64. Shen, Jianming. “International Law Rules and Historical Evidence Supporting China’s Title to the South China Sea Islands.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 21, no. 1 (1997–1998): 1–75.Google Scholar
  65. Shen, Jianming. “China’s Sovereignty Over the South China Sea Islands: A Historical Perspective.” Chinese Journal of International Law 1, no. 1 (January 2002): 94–157. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000432.
  66. Stedman, Stephen John. “Alchemy for a New World Order: Overselling ‘Preventive Diplomacy’” Foreign Affairs 74, no. 3 (1995): 14. doi: 10.2307/20047119.
  67. The China Sea Directory. Vol. 2. London: Hydrographic Office, The Admiralty, 1889.Google Scholar
  68. “The Recent Piracy in Canton Waters.” The Times (London), January 25, 1908.Google Scholar
  69. Tønnesson, Stein. An International History of the Dispute in the South China Sea. 2001. East Asia Institute Working Paper No. 71, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  70. Tønnesson, Stein. “The South China Sea in the Age of European Decline.” Modern Asian Studies 40, no. 01 (February 2006): 1–57. doi: 10.1017/s0026749x06001727.
  71. Lien-ho-pao [United daily news], overseas edition, February 25, 1974, p. 3.Google Scholar
  72. United States Pacific Fleet, Patrol Bombing Squadron 128. May 6, 1945. Action Report. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration Catalog ID 4697018 via Fold3 www.fold3.com/image/#295881925.
  73. “US Navy, USS Cabrilla Report of 8th War Patrol, July 1945.” U.S. National Archives and Records Administration via Fold3 www.fold3.com/image/#300365402.
  74. US Office of Naval Intelligence Review. May 1956 p. 189. Quoted in David Muller, China as a maritime power, Westview Press, 1983 p. 80.Google Scholar
  75. “USS Bugara.” Digital Image. World War II War Diaries, 1941–1945. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration via Fold3 http://www.fold3.com/image/#302085830.
  76. “USS Cabezon.” Digital Image. World War II War Diaries, 1941–1945. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration via Fold3 http://www.fold3.com/image/#301980652.
  77. “USS Sea Fox.” Digital Image. World War II War Diaries, 1941–1945. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration Catalog ID 305241 via Fold3 http://www.fold3.com/image/#301745082.
  78. “Vietnamese Claim of Sovereignty Refuted.” Free China Weekly (Taipei), June 26, 1956.Google Scholar
  79. Wai Jiao Bu Nan Hai Zhu Dao Dang An Hui Bian [Compilation by the Department of Foreign Affairs of All the records Concerning the Islands in the South Sea]. Vol. 1. Taipei: Department of Foreign Affairs, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bill Hayton
    • 1
  1. 1.Asia Programme, Chatham HouseLondonUK

Personalised recommendations