Exergoeconomic Analysis

  • Aicha MabroukEmail author
  • Jalel Labidi
  • Abdelaziz Rekik
  • Mohamed-Razak Jeday
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


Exergoeconomics is the branch of engineering that combines exergy analysis and economic principles to provide the system designer or operator with information not available through conventional energy analysis and economic evaluations but crucial to the design and operation of a cost-effective system (Bejan et al., Thermal design and optimization, Wiley, 1996). In fact, it provides extra information than exergy analysis for the design of cost-effective energy systems, as an exergy-aided cost-reduction method, by associating costs with exergy losses. It aims to calculate separately the costs of each product generated by a system having more than one product, to understand the cost-formation process and the flow of costs in the system, to optimize specific variables in a single component, or to optimize the overall system (Abusoglu and Kanoglu, Renaw Sust Energy Rev 13:2295–2308, 2009). Many examples of exergoeconomic approaches were found in literature and can be divided into two classes: (1) the exergoeconomic accounting methods that aim at the costing of product streams, the evaluation of components and systems, and the iterative optimization of energy systems; (2) the calculus approaches have as a goal the optimization of the overall system and the calculation of marginal costs (Atmaca and Yumrutas, Energy Convers Manag 79:790–798, 2014a; Atmaca and Yumrutas, Energy Convers Manag 79:799–808, 2014b).

The basic elements of exergoeconomics are presented in this work including cost balances, means for costing exergy transfers, and exergoeconomic variables used for the evaluation and optimization of a thermal or chemical system.


Exergoeconomic Exergy analysis Exergoeconomic approaches 


  1. Abusoglu, A., Kanoglu, M.: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production. Renaw. Sust. Energy Rev. 13, 2295–2308 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. Atmaca, A., Yumrutas, R.: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of a cement plant part I; methodology. Energy Convers. Manag. 79, 790–798 (2014a)Google Scholar
  3. Atmaca, A., Yumrutas, R.: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of a cement plant part II; application. Energy Convers. Manag. 79, 799–808 (2014b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bejan, A, Tsatsaronis, G, Moran, M.: Thermal design and optimization, 1st ed., New York: Wiley (1996)Google Scholar
  5. Erlach, B., Serra, L., Valero, A.: Structural theory as standard for thermoeconomics. Energy Convers. Manag. 40, 1627–1649 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gagioli, R.A., Sayedym, E.: A critical review of second law costing. Methods. 2. Calculus procedures. J Energy Resour. ASME. 111, 8–15 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, S., Kwon, Y., Kwakhy: Exergoeconomic analysis systems. Energy. 23, 393–406 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kwak, H.Y., Byun, G.T., Kwon, Y.H., Yang, H.: Cost structure of CGAM cogeneration system. Int. J. Energy Res. 28, 1145–1158 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kwon, Y., Kwak, H., Oh, S.D.: Exergoeconomic analysis of gas turbine cogeneration systems. Int. J. Exergy. 1, 31–40 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lazaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G.: SPECO: a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy. 31, 1257–1289 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Lazaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G.: Comparison between SPECO and functional exergoeconomics approaches. In: Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition IMECE/AES 23656, pp. 11–16 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. Lozano, M.A., Valero, A.: A theory of the exergetic cost. Energy. 18, 939–960 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Modesto, M., Nebra, S.A.: Exergoeconomic analysis of the power generation system using blast furnace gas and coke oven in a brazil steel mill. Appl. Therm. Eng. 29, 2127–2136 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parida, P., Gupta, D.: An improved regula falsi method for enclosing simple zeros of non-linear equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 177, 769–776 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Seyyedi, S.M., Ajam, H., Faraht, S.: A new approach for optimization of thermal power plant based on the exergoeconomic analysis and structural optimization method: application to the CGAM problem. Energy Convers. Manag. 51, 2202–2211 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh, O.K., Kaushik, S.C.: Thermoeconomic evaluation and optimization of a Brayton-Rankine-Kalina combined triple power cycle. Energy Convers. Manag. 71, 32–42 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsatsaronis, G., Lin, L., Pisa, J.: Exergy costing in exergoeconomics. J. Energy Resour. ASME. 115, 9–16 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tsatsaronis, G., Pisa, J.: Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systems—application to the CGAM problem. Energy. 19, 287–321 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Valero, A., Serra, L., Uche, J.: Fundamentals of thermoeconomics. In: EURO Summer Course on Sustainable Assessment of Clean Air Technologies, pp. 1–39. EURO, Zaragoza (2001)Google Scholar
  20. Von Spakovsky, M.R., Curti, V., Batato, M.: The Performance Optimization of a Cogeneration/Heat Pump Facility. ECOS’92, ASME, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  21. Yildirim, U., Gungor, A.: An application of exergoeconomic analysis for a CHP system. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 42, 250–256 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aicha Mabrouk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jalel Labidi
    • 2
  • Abdelaziz Rekik
    • 3
  • Mohamed-Razak Jeday
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartmentNational School of Engineers of GabesGabèsTunisia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of the Basque CountrySan SebatianSpain
  3. 3.Tunisian Society of Electrical and GasBen ArousTunisia

Personalised recommendations