The Political Economy of Oil: The Limits of Our Ability to Prevent Failure

  • Jose A. Bolanos
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


This chapter deals with the tensions created by the co-existence of cooperative and competitive approaches to energy security in the context of oil. It looks at this issue from three perspectives. Firstly, the existence of ambiguities about the concepts in both practical and theoretical terms. Secondly, the historical oscillation between biases for both concepts as a main response to perceived failures. Thirdly, the fact that the complexity of modern oil markets exacerbates these challenges. It concludes by noting that, although practical and theoretical efforts to operationalise competition and cooperation have improved our ability to achieve energy security with regard to oil, neither competition nor cooperation can, at least for the time being, avoid some (and often considerable) degree of failure. Although we should continue to try to avoid critical failures inasmuch as possible, we should also stop designing oil markets with the idea of avoiding failure as the main and only objective. Instead, more attention should be given to discussing how either competition or cooperation can help us recover efficiently from the failures that do arise – even if trade-offs are necessary.


  1. APERC. 2007. Quest for Energy Security in the 21st Century. Tokyo: Institute of Energy Economics, Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC).Google Scholar
  2. Baumann, F. 2008. Energy Security as Multidimensional Concept, Policy Analysis 1. Munich: CAP – Center for Applied Policy Research.
  3. BBC. 2014. Opec Oil Output Will Not Be Cut Even If Price Hits $20 – BBC News. London: BBC News.
  4. Bolanos, J.A. 2016. The Future of Oil: Between Cooperation & Competition, Strategy Paper 13. London: European Centre for Energy and Resource Security (EUCERS).
  5. Dannreuther, R. 2010. International Relations Theories: Energy, Minerals and Conflict, Working Paper 8. Dundee: POLINARES.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2013. Introduction: The Dynamics of Conflict and Cooperation. In Global Resources: Conflict and Cooperation, ed. W. Ostrowski and R. Dannreuther, 1–9. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 2016a. Competition. Oakland:
  8. ———. 2016b. Cooperation. Oakland:
  9. Dinesh Kumar, M., N. Bassi, A. Narayanamoorthy, and M.V.K. Sivamohan, eds. 2014. The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. EIA. 2016a. Data – Table 7.2a: Electricity Net Generation: Total (All Sectors). Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
  11. ———. 2016b. Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) / Global Petroleum and Other Liquids. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
  12. Fletcher, N. 2016. Oil Price Surges as OPEC and Non-OPEC Members Agree Deal to Cut Output. London: The Guardian.
  13. Fossil Free. 2015. What Is Fossil Fuel Divestment? Brooklyn:
  14. Fursenko, A.A. 1990. The Battle for Oil: The Economics and Politics of International Corporate Conflict Over Petroleum, 1860–1930. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gholz, E., and D G Press. 2010. Protecting ‘the Prize’: Oil and the US National Interest. Security Studies 19 (3): 453–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldthau, A. 2008. Rhetoric Versus Reality: Russian Threats to European Energy Supply. Energy Policy 36 (2): 686–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gordon, L. 2015. UC Sells Off $200 Million in Coal and Oil Sands Investments. Los Angeles: LA Times.
  18. Graetz, M.J. 2012. Energy Policy: Past or Prologue? Daedalus 141 (2): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greene, W.N. 1984. Strategies of the Major Oil Companies. Ann Arbor: UMI Press.Google Scholar
  20. Haghighi, S.S. 2007. Energy Security: The External Legal Relations of the European Union with Major Oil and Gas Supplying Countries. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  21. Harvey, D. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. IEA. 2014. Agreement on an International Energy Program (As Amended 9 May 2014). Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA).
  23. ———. 2016. Oil Medium-Term Market Report 2016: Market Analysis and Forecasts to 2021. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA).Google Scholar
  24. Keohane, R.O., and L.L. Martin. 1995. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security 20 (1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klare, M. 2001. Resource Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2003. For Oil and Empire? Rethinking War with Iraq. Current History 102 (662): 129–135.Google Scholar
  27. Le Billon, P. 2004. The Geopolitical Economy of ‘Resource Wars’. Geopolitics 9 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marx, K. 1867. Capital, Volume I. Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.Google Scholar
  29. Mattauch, M. 2015. Church of England Divests from Dirtiest Fossil Fuels. Brooklyn:
  30. Mearsheimer, J.J. 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3): 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merriam-Webster. 2016a. Definition of Competition. Springfield: Merriam-Webster. Scholar
  32. ———. 2016b. Definition of Cooperation. Springfield: Merriam-Webster. Scholar
  33. Mouawad, J. 2008. Oil Prices Pass Record Set in ’80s, but Then Recede. New York: The New York Times.
  34. Petroleka, M. 2016. Oil Prices – How Low? How Long? In Conference Participation Presented at the EUCERS/ISD/KAS Energy Talks 2016 #2, London, April 20.Google Scholar
  35. Reed, S. 2016. Russia and Others Join OPEC in Rare, Coordinated Push to Cut Oil Output. New York: The New York Times, December 10.
  36. Reuters. 2011. Factbox: How Much Is 60 Million Barrels of Oil? New York: Reuters.
  37. Rogers, B. 1974. Southern Africa and the Oil Embargo. Africa Today 21 (2): 3–8.Google Scholar
  38. Rose, E.A. 2004. OPEC’s Dominance of the Global Oil Market: The Rise of the World’s Dependency on Oil. The Middle East Journal 58 (3): 424–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rühl, C. 2010. Global Energy After the Crisis: Prospects and Priorities. Foreign Affairs 89 (2): 63–75.Google Scholar
  40. Street, C.W. 2016. OPEC Concedes Defeat in Anti-Shale Oil War with U.S. Los Angeles: Breitbart.
  41. Tarbell, I.M. 2009. The History of the Standard Oil Company. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  42. Umbach, F. 2016. The Intersection of Climate Protection Policies and Energy Security. In Transatlantic Energy Relations: Convergence or Divergence, ed. J.R. Deni and K.S. Stegen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Wade, T, and A. Driver. 2016. Rockefeller Family Fund Hits Exxon, Divests from Fossil Fuels. London: Reuters.
  44. Walt, S.M. 1985. Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security 9 (4): 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 1987. The Origins of Alliance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, J.D. 2015. Multilateral Organisations and the Limits to International Energy Cooperation. New Political Economy 20 (1): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yergin, D. 1988. Energy Security in the 1990s. Foreign Affairs 67 (1): 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zeluck, S. 1979. The Energy Crisis – A Marxist View. Urgent Tasks: Journal of the Revolutionary Left 6 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose A. Bolanos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political EconomyKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations