Advertisement

The Extreme Lateral Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction: An Anatomical Study

  • Francesco Signorelli
  • Walter Pisciotta
  • Vittorio Stumpo
  • Pasquale Ciappetta
  • Alessandro Olivi
  • Massimiliano Visocchi
Chapter
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 125)

Abstract

Background: The extreme lateral approach is a direct lateral approach which allows a good control of the entire length of the vertebral artery (VA), the jugular foramen, the lowest cranial nerves, and the jugular–sigmoid complex. Herein we try to exploit the variants of the approach and we identify indications, advantages, and disadvantages.

Methods: All phases of the study were conducted at the Institute of Public Health Section of Legal Medicine and Insurance of the University. We performed the extreme lateral approach in four subjects, who died between 24 and 48 h before in non-traumatic circumstances (three men and one woman).

Results: The great auricular nerve, the spinal accessory, the branches of the first ventral spinal nerves, the jugular vein, and the vertebral artery were identified in all the cadavers. In all cases the right VA exited from the transverse foramen of C1. The site of SCM piercing the accessory nerve was at a distance from the tip of the mastoid between 3 and 4 cm (3.3 in one case, 3.4 in 2 cases, and 3.7 in one case). No vessels and nerves have been damaged after being identified and isolated.

Conclusions: Extradural lesions at the ventro-lateral aspect of the CVJ may require an extreme lateral approach, a procedure more aggressive comparing with far lateral approach, which represents a reasonable option for large anterior and anterolateral lesions when greater exposure is required.

Keywords

Extreme lateral approach Craniocervical junction Craniovertebral junction 

References

  1. 1.
    Banerji D, Behari S, Jain VK, Pandey T, Chhabra DK. Extreme lateral transcondylar approach to the skull base. Neurol India. 1999;47:22–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cornu P, Hentati K, Chabolle F, Zouaoui A, Tamisier D, Hidden G, et al. Lateral approach to the foramen magnum. Surg Radiol Anat. 1990;12:77–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crockard HA, Sen CN. The transoral approach for the management of intradural lesions at the craniovertebral junction: review of 7 cases. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Oliveira E, Rhoton AL Jr, Peace D. Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the foramen magnum. Surg Neurol. 1985;24:293–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    George B, Dermatons C, Cophignon J. Lateral approach to the anterior portion of the foramen magnum. Application to surgical removal of 14 benign tumors: technical note. Surg Neurol. 1988;29:484–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    George B, Lot G, Boissonnet H. Meningioma of the foramen magnum: a series of 40 cases. Surg Neurol. 1997;47:371–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilsbach JM. Extreme lateral approach to intradural lesions of the cervical spine and foramen magnum. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goel A, Desai K, Muzumdar D. Surgery on anterior foramen magnum meningiomas using a conventional posterior suboccipital approach: a report on an experience with 17 cases. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:102–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heros RC. Lateral suboccipital approach for vertebral and vertebrobasilar artery lesions. J Neurosurg. 1986;64:559–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kratimenos GP, Crockard HA. The far lateral approach for ventrally placed foramen magnum and upper cervical spine tumours. Br J Neurosurg. 1993;7:129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rhoton AL Jr. The foramen magnum. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(Suppl 3):S155–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwaber MK, Netterville JL, Maciunas R. Microsurgical anatomy of the lower skullbase—a morphometric analysis. Am J Otol. 1990;11:401–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sekhar LN, Babu RP, Wright DC. Surgical resection of cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1994;5:299–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-Mefty O, Borba LA, Aoki N, Angtuaco E, Pait TG. The transcondylar approach to extradural nonneoplastic lesions of the craniovertebral junction. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    George B, Laurian C. Surgical approach to the whole length of the vertebral artery with special reference to the third portion. Acta Neurochir. 1980;51:259–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verbiest H. A lateral approach to the cervical spine: technique and indications. J Neurosurg. 1968;28:191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    George B, Gauthier N, Lot G. Multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy treated by multilevel oblique corpectomies without fusion. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(1):81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Signorelli
    • 1
  • Walter Pisciotta
    • 1
  • Vittorio Stumpo
    • 1
  • Pasquale Ciappetta
    • 2
  • Alessandro Olivi
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Visocchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of NeurosurgeryCatholic University School of MedicineRomeItaly
  2. 2.Section of Neurological Surgery, University of Bari Medical SchoolBariItaly

Personalised recommendations